Arthroscopic repair of superior glenoid labral detachment (the SLAP lesion)*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80051-7Get rights and content

Complete detachment of the glenoid labrum from the superior pole of the glenoid, which is associated with a destabilization of the origin of the long biceps tendon, leads to altered function in the shoulder joint. This is especially noticeable when the shoulder is used in overhead activities. Two operative techniques are described for reattachment of the glenoid labrum to the glenoid. In the first six patients the glenoid labrum was reattached with small cannulated titanium screws. In five patients these screws were inserted under arthroscopic control from a cranial direction. The labrum was always reattached just behind the origin of the long biceps tendon. The most favorable portal was identified by percutaneous probing with a Kirschner wire. If the superior glenoid pole could not be reached via a portal placed anterior or medial to the acromion, a hole was drilled through the acromion, and a transacromial approach was used. The screws were removed by arthroscopy after 3 to 5 months. In the last eight patients, absorbable tacks were used instead of screws. Of 18 patients who showed a complete detachment of the glenoid labrum from the superior pole of the glenoid with destabilization of the attachment of the biceps tendon, 14 underwent reattachment as described previously. The minimum follow-up time was greater than 6 months (mean follow-up time 18 months, maximum follow-up time 30 months). At follow-up, eight patients felt completely rehabilitated and had resumed their previous overhead activities (overhead sports). Four patients believed their conditions were improved. Two patients had not experienced any improvement. Of the patients who had not undergone reattachment and who had undergone shaving of the free margin of the glenoid labrum, only one had experienced improvement, while the other three patients did not report any improvement.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (64)

  • SLAP Tears in the Throwing Shoulder: A Review of the Current Concepts in Management and Outcomes

    2021, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In 1991, Yoneda et al. found good to excellent results in 8 of 10 athletes that underwent repair with metal staples.29 Metal screws were less effective as Resch et al. showed that most (10/14) athletes were able to RTP while little more than half (8/14) could RTPP.30 The authors noted that screw loosening was a significant concern and conceded that bioabsorbable tacks were a superior option for this reason.

  • Superior Labral Anterior Posterior Repair

    2013, Rehabilitation for the Postsurgical Orthopedic Patient: Third Edition
  • Superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) rehabilitation in the overhead athlete

    2010, Physical Therapy in Sport
    Citation Excerpt :

    Later, others have expanded the classification system based on subtle differences that were felt to have critical implications on surgery and outcomes (Gartsman, & Hammerman, 2000; Maffet, Gartsman, & Moseley, 1995; Morgan, Burkhart, Palmeri & Gillespie, 1998). Despite the overwhelming attention the evaluation and treatment of SLAP lesions demands, the true incidence of these injuries is relatively low with an incidence of between 6 and 20% of all arthroscopic shoulder cases (Barber, Field, & Ryu, 2007; Field & Savoie, 1993; Handelberg, Willems, Shahabpour, Huskin, Kuta 1998; Hawkins, & Kennedy, 1980; Ide, Maeda, & Takagi, 2005; Kim, Ha, Kim, & Choi, 2002; Maffet et al., 1995; Mileski & Snyder, 1998; Resch, Golser, Thoeni, & Sperner, 1993; Snyder, Banas, & Belzer, 1996; Snyder, Banas, & Karzel, 1995; Snyder et al., 1990; Snyder, Rames, & Wolber, 1991; Stetson, Snyder, Karzel, Banas & Rahhal, 1998). The purpose of this article is to discuss the anatomy and classification of SLAP tears, the mechanism of injury, an evidence-based examination, surgical procedures and subsequent rehabilitation of these complicated lesions.

  • Superior Labral Lesions Anterior to Posterior-Evaluation and Arthroscopic Management

    2008, Clinics in Sports Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Type III lesions require resection of the unstable bucket-handle fragment, followed by assessment of the stability of the residual labrum and biceps anchor. When excising the fragment, care must be taken to avoid destabilization of the middle glenohumeral ligament.11–18,61–68 In patients with a cord-like middle glenohumeral ligament attaching to the anterosuperior labrum, such debridement can inadvertently precipitate anterior instability, requiring formal repair with suture anchors.11–18,61–68

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Superior Labrum, both anterior and posterior.

View full text