Original article
Anorectal melanoma in The Netherlands: a report of 63 patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-7983(96)92346-XGet rights and content

A retrospective analysis was performed of the clinical features and results of surgical treatment modalities of 63 cases of anorectal melanoma collected in The Netherlands. Most tumours presented in an advanced stage due to the obscure location and lack of specific symptoms. There were 34 patients with clinical stage I disease who were treated by either local sphincter-saving surgery (n = 16) or who had undergone an abdominoperineal resection (APR) (n = 18). We could not find a survival advantage for either one of these two treatment modalities. However, after a local procedure far more local recurrences were seen (12:1), but this did not influence the clinical course of these patients, as they often rapidly succumbed to distant metastases. It is concluded that, in the future, patients presenting with an anorectal melanoma should be treated with a sphincter-saving surgical approach whenever possible.

References (10)

  • WanéboHJ et al.

    Anorectal melanoma

    Cancer

    (1981)
  • GoldmanS et al.

    Anorectal malignant melanoma in Sweden

    Report of 49 patients

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1990)
  • QuanSHQ

    Anal cancers

    Squamous and melanoma

    Cancer

    (1992)
  • RossMR et al.

    Patterns of failure in anorectal melanoma

    Arch Surg

    (1990)
  • WillemsenHL et al.

    Melanomen in het anorectale gebied

    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

    (1980)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (103)

  • Anorectal mucosal melanoma

    2023, Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
  • Survival following surgical treatment for anorectal melanoma seems similar for local excision and extensive resection regardless of nodal involvement

    2021, Surgical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Other studies with small patient numbers did not show any discernible difference in survival between local excision and abdominoperineal resection [17–19]. Remarkable is that a previous study from the Netherlands by Roumen [20] analyzed 63 anorectal melanoma cases and already concluded in 1996 that “patients with local disease should, whenever possible, undergo a local procedure, since a more radical and mutilating approach does not lead to a better long-term survival, while more short-term morbidity and discomfort can be expected”. Despite this conclusion and the conclusions of most abovementioned studies, the present study did not find a decrease of extensive resections in the Netherlands over time.

  • Clinical and oncological outcomes of surgery in Anorectal melanoma in Asian population: A 15 year analysis at a tertiary cancer institute

    2021, Cancer Treatment and Research Communications
    Citation Excerpt :

    ARMM usually may present as a polypoidal lesions mimicking as hemorrhoids or polyps commonly at the dentate line projecting into the anorectal lumen, or sometimes as large growths occupying the entire rectal lumen [7,8]. The disease is characterized by an early systemic spread and dismal prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate estimated to be less than 20% in most of the previous studies [2,9–11]. Surgical management has remained the cornerstone for non-metastatic anorectal melanomas, the two procedures being done are abdominoperineal resection (APR) and wide local excision.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text