Elsevier

Burns

Volume 28, Issue 2, March 2002, Pages 151-160
Burns

Long-term results of a clinical trial on dermal substitution.: A light microscopy and Fourier analysis based evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(01)00085-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Although dermal substitution is a main topic of current wound healing research, there is a paucity of clinical trials with a long-term clinical and histopathological evaluation. A clinical trial was conducted to perform an intra-individual comparison of conventional treatment (split-thickness autograft) to a collagen/elastin dermal substitute in combination with an autograft. Promising results with this substitute were obtained with respect to dermal organisation and scar elasticity in animal studies and clinical trials with a short-term follow-up.

Twenty-nine of the 42 pairs of the burn wounds and 28 of the 44 pairs of the scar reconstructions enrolled in the study were biopsied after 1 year.

Promising but not statistically significant differences were found between substituted groups and control groups for epidermal thickness, basement membrane maturation, rete ridges (P=0.055), fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, inflammatory cells, vessels and extracellular matrix maturation.

An objective and accurate technique, Fourier analysis, was used to evaluate collagen bundle orientation and packing. However, no statistically significant differences were obtained for these parameters.

This microscopic evaluation provided no convincing evidence for a long-term effectiveness of a dermal substitute despite promising data over a short-term in in vitro and in vivo studies with the same material.

Introduction

The past decade has seen the emergence of tissue engineering as an increasingly more viable alternative for skin replacement. Artificial skin is considered beneficial for ‘difficult-to-heal’ chronic venous-ulcers, as well as for acute wounds such as burns and reconstructive wounds. Although a considerable number of papers have been published during the last decades regarding clinical trials using dermal and epidermal substitutes for acute wounds, only a few manuscripts with long-term follow-up and histopathological evaluations can be found [1], [2].

This paper describes the microscopic results of a clinical trial concerning a dermal substitute that is composed of collagen type I and elastin hydrolysate. Previously, this dermal substitute was shown to have a beneficial effect on wound healing in animal studies [3], [4] and in a clinical study concerning small punch biopsy wounds [5], demonstrating faster dermal maturation [3], [4], improved restoration of dermal organisation [5] and reduced contraction [3], [5].

More recently, a clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the collagen/elastin substitute by means of clinical and microscopic parameters for burns and reconstructive wounds. The clinical evaluation of the study showed that the elasticity of the reconstructive wounds was significantly improved by the dermal substitute after 3 months [6]. The elasticity was measured with an objective skin elasticity device measuring: the cutometer. Despite the promising short-term results, no statistically significant beneficial effect was shown after 1 year for reconstructive wounds [7]. For burn wounds, no statistically significant differences were shown for skin elasticity parameters in the short- and long-term. The microscopic evaluation of this clinical trial 1 year after surgery is presented in this paper.

Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the structure of epidermis, basement membrane and most importantly, the dermal architecture was utilised. We focused our attention on collagen as it is the most prevalent protein in the dermis that plays a crucial role in its function and strength [8]. In normal skin, collagen is arranged in a ‘basket weave’ pattern [9] in contrast to scar tissue which has collagen bundles orientated parallel to the epidermis [2], [10]. Morphometry was performed on collagen bundle orientation and packing by means of Fourier analysis. Previously, we established that this technique was convenient and more accurate than the ‘gold standard’ of multi-observer evaluation permitting quantification of collagen bundle orientation and packing [11].

Section snippets

Patients and methods

A clinical trial was performed based on intra-individual comparison of subjects. Patients were eligible if they were admitted to our hospital and needed excision and skin grafting for acute burn wounds or scar reconstruction after a burn injury. The patients, or their legal representatives, gave informed consent before surgery. The Ethics Committee from the Red Cross Hospital approved the protocol before the start of the trial.

Results

Twenty-nine of the 42 paired treatments for burn wounds (69%) were biopsied after 328 days post-surgery (S.D.: 73). Biopsies of 28 of the 44 paired treatments (64%) in the scar reconstruction category were harvested 302 days post-surgery (S.D.: 74).

Overviews of the results of both categories are listed in Table 1, Table 2. In both tables a column was added that indicated the reference value of normal skin. Of those patients who underwent scar reconstruction with the dermal substitute, the rete

Discussion

Dermal substitution is one of the main topics of acute and chronic wound healing research. Remarkably, clinical trials with large sized populations are lacking with respect to histopathological, immunohistochemical and objective long-term evaluation. We have used both subjective and objective methods to compare a dermal substitute with autograft to the conventional treatment (split skin autograft) in patients with burns and scar reconstructions.

In both acute burn and reconstructive wound

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Technology Foundation (Stichting Technische Wetenschappen), the Dutch Burns Foundation and The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

We gratefully acknowledge Adam Angeles M.D. for his valuable comments, Jos Vloemans, M.D, Toine van Trier M.D., and Frits Groenevelt M.D, Ph.D. for their clinical assistance during this study. Henk van Veen Ph.D. and Joris Ruurda are acknowledged for their technical assistance.

References (24)

  • Peacock EE. Structure, synthesis, and interaction of fibrous protein and matrix. In: Peacock EE, editors, Wound Repair....
  • H.P. Ehrlich et al.

    Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Preliminary results in single-step wound closure procedure of full-thickness facial burns in children by using the collagen-elastin matrix and review of pediatric facial burns

      2015, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      As the healing process advances, the fibroblasts produce their own collagen matrix while collagen–elastin matrix is degraded. Experiences from a human clinical trial on the treatment of punch biopsy wounds demonstrated that collagen–elastin matrix is completely resorbed 6 weeks after implantation [35]. Nowadays, dermal substitutes are considered to play a more prominent role in burn surgery and have shown to minimize hypertrophic scarring, contractures and increase scar elasticity in acute burn wounds [9,10].

    • Cost study of dermal substitutes and topical negative pressure in the surgical treatment of burns

      2014, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      In reconstructive burn wounds, with this technique, an improvement in scar quality was found [4]. The use of dermal substitutes in acute burns, however, did not lead to improvement of scar quality in previous studies of our research group [4,8–10]. Thus, to improve the effectiveness of dermal substitutes in burns, additional strategies need to be investigated.

    • Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering

      2013, Progress in Polymer Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Short-term follow-up revealed that skin elasticity was considerably improved by the collagen/elastin dermal substitute as analyzed by Cutometer measurements [478]. Long-term evaluations with respect to elasticity are consistent with the former findings, but the difference between controls was not significant after 1 year [479,480]. In the study of another group, the same collagen/3% α-elastin dermal matrix was used in ten patients as a dermal substitute in severe burn injuries of the hand.

    • Active Wound Coverings: Bioengineered Skin and Dermal Substitutes

      2010, Surgical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, wound contraction was significantly less in wounds treated with MatriDerm. Long-term follow-up showed that fibronectin formation of the dermis reconstructed with MatriDerm was comparable to normal, uninjured skin.11,12 MatriDerm also allows the clinician to simultaneously place an autologous split-thickness skin graft within the same procedure, which helps minimize the need for a second operation in burn surgery.13,14

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: IsoTis BV, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

    View full text