Long-term results of a clinical trial on dermal substitution.: A light microscopy and Fourier analysis based evaluation
Introduction
The past decade has seen the emergence of tissue engineering as an increasingly more viable alternative for skin replacement. Artificial skin is considered beneficial for ‘difficult-to-heal’ chronic venous-ulcers, as well as for acute wounds such as burns and reconstructive wounds. Although a considerable number of papers have been published during the last decades regarding clinical trials using dermal and epidermal substitutes for acute wounds, only a few manuscripts with long-term follow-up and histopathological evaluations can be found [1], [2].
This paper describes the microscopic results of a clinical trial concerning a dermal substitute that is composed of collagen type I and elastin hydrolysate. Previously, this dermal substitute was shown to have a beneficial effect on wound healing in animal studies [3], [4] and in a clinical study concerning small punch biopsy wounds [5], demonstrating faster dermal maturation [3], [4], improved restoration of dermal organisation [5] and reduced contraction [3], [5].
More recently, a clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the collagen/elastin substitute by means of clinical and microscopic parameters for burns and reconstructive wounds. The clinical evaluation of the study showed that the elasticity of the reconstructive wounds was significantly improved by the dermal substitute after 3 months [6]. The elasticity was measured with an objective skin elasticity device measuring: the cutometer. Despite the promising short-term results, no statistically significant beneficial effect was shown after 1 year for reconstructive wounds [7]. For burn wounds, no statistically significant differences were shown for skin elasticity parameters in the short- and long-term. The microscopic evaluation of this clinical trial 1 year after surgery is presented in this paper.
Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the structure of epidermis, basement membrane and most importantly, the dermal architecture was utilised. We focused our attention on collagen as it is the most prevalent protein in the dermis that plays a crucial role in its function and strength [8]. In normal skin, collagen is arranged in a ‘basket weave’ pattern [9] in contrast to scar tissue which has collagen bundles orientated parallel to the epidermis [2], [10]. Morphometry was performed on collagen bundle orientation and packing by means of Fourier analysis. Previously, we established that this technique was convenient and more accurate than the ‘gold standard’ of multi-observer evaluation permitting quantification of collagen bundle orientation and packing [11].
Section snippets
Patients and methods
A clinical trial was performed based on intra-individual comparison of subjects. Patients were eligible if they were admitted to our hospital and needed excision and skin grafting for acute burn wounds or scar reconstruction after a burn injury. The patients, or their legal representatives, gave informed consent before surgery. The Ethics Committee from the Red Cross Hospital approved the protocol before the start of the trial.
Results
Twenty-nine of the 42 paired treatments for burn wounds (69%) were biopsied after 328 days post-surgery (S.D.: 73). Biopsies of 28 of the 44 paired treatments (64%) in the scar reconstruction category were harvested 302 days post-surgery (S.D.: 74).
Overviews of the results of both categories are listed in Table 1, Table 2. In both tables a column was added that indicated the reference value of normal skin. Of those patients who underwent scar reconstruction with the dermal substitute, the rete
Discussion
Dermal substitution is one of the main topics of acute and chronic wound healing research. Remarkably, clinical trials with large sized populations are lacking with respect to histopathological, immunohistochemical and objective long-term evaluation. We have used both subjective and objective methods to compare a dermal substitute with autograft to the conventional treatment (split skin autograft) in patients with burns and scar reconstructions.
In both acute burn and reconstructive wound
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Technology Foundation (Stichting Technische Wetenschappen), the Dutch Burns Foundation and The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.
We gratefully acknowledge Adam Angeles M.D. for his valuable comments, Jos Vloemans, M.D, Toine van Trier M.D., and Frits Groenevelt M.D, Ph.D. for their clinical assistance during this study. Henk van Veen Ph.D. and Joris Ruurda are acknowledged for their technical assistance.
References (24)
- et al.
The histiotypic organization of the hypertrofic scar in humans
J. Invest. Dermatol.
(1972) - et al.
Widely expanded postage stamp skin grafts using a modified Meek technique in combination with an allograft overlay
Burns
(1993) - et al.
Dermal organization in scleroderma: the fast Fourier transform and the laser-scatter method objectify fibrosis in nonlesional as well as lesional skin
Lab. Invest.
(2000) - et al.
Histologic study of artificial skin used in the treatment of full-thickness thermal injury
J. Burn Care Rehabil.
(1990) - et al.
Skin regenerated from cultured epithelial autografts on full-thickness burn wounds from 6 days to 5 years after grafting. A light electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study
Lab. Invest.
(1989) - et al.
Dermal regeneration in native non cross-linked collagen sponges with different extracellular matrix molecules
Wnd. Rep. Reg.
(1994) - et al.
Extracellular matrix characterization during healing of full-thickness wounds treated with a collagen/elastin dermal substitute shows improved skin regeneration in pigs
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
(1996) - et al.
Reduced wound contraction and scar formation in punch biopsy wounds. Native collagen dermal substitutes. A clinical study
Br. J. Dermatol.
(1995) - et al.
Graft survival and effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns and reconstructive surgery in a one-stage grafting model
Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
(2000) - van Zuijlen PPM, Vloemans AFPM, van Trier AJM. et al. Dermal substitution in acute burns and reconstructive surgery: a...
Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar
Am. J. Pathol.
Cited by (43)
Preliminary results in single-step wound closure procedure of full-thickness facial burns in children by using the collagen-elastin matrix and review of pediatric facial burns
2015, BurnsCitation Excerpt :As the healing process advances, the fibroblasts produce their own collagen matrix while collagen–elastin matrix is degraded. Experiences from a human clinical trial on the treatment of punch biopsy wounds demonstrated that collagen–elastin matrix is completely resorbed 6 weeks after implantation [35]. Nowadays, dermal substitutes are considered to play a more prominent role in burn surgery and have shown to minimize hypertrophic scarring, contractures and increase scar elasticity in acute burn wounds [9,10].
Cost study of dermal substitutes and topical negative pressure in the surgical treatment of burns
2014, BurnsCitation Excerpt :In reconstructive burn wounds, with this technique, an improvement in scar quality was found [4]. The use of dermal substitutes in acute burns, however, did not lead to improvement of scar quality in previous studies of our research group [4,8–10]. Thus, to improve the effectiveness of dermal substitutes in burns, additional strategies need to be investigated.
Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering
2013, Progress in Polymer ScienceCitation Excerpt :Short-term follow-up revealed that skin elasticity was considerably improved by the collagen/elastin dermal substitute as analyzed by Cutometer measurements [478]. Long-term evaluations with respect to elasticity are consistent with the former findings, but the difference between controls was not significant after 1 year [479,480]. In the study of another group, the same collagen/3% α-elastin dermal matrix was used in ten patients as a dermal substitute in severe burn injuries of the hand.
Active Wound Coverings: Bioengineered Skin and Dermal Substitutes
2010, Surgical Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Also, wound contraction was significantly less in wounds treated with MatriDerm. Long-term follow-up showed that fibronectin formation of the dermis reconstructed with MatriDerm was comparable to normal, uninjured skin.11,12 MatriDerm also allows the clinician to simultaneously place an autologous split-thickness skin graft within the same procedure, which helps minimize the need for a second operation in burn surgery.13,14
An Overview on the Manufacturing of Functional and Mature Cellular Skin Substitutes
2022, Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews
- 1
Present address: IsoTis BV, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.