European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Original ArticlePostpartum, also a risk period for domestic violence
Introduction
Domestic violence is recognised as a global health problem [1].
High rates of violence towards a woman by her intimate partner is not rare and it occurs in all socio-demographic groups [2]. The prevalence of violence at any time in a woman’s life ranges from 9.7 to 29.7% and the prevalence figures of violence during pregnancy varies between 0.9 and 20.1% [3]. Several studies confirm physical abuse during pregnancy and how it effects the maternal health [4]. Thus, pregnancy is not a protective period for the abused woman.
Research evidence indicates that abuse during pregnancy causes serious health problems for both the woman and the unborn child and that abused women often enter prenatal care late [5], [6]. Pregnant women in abusive relations have been shown to endure a substantial risk of being subjected to alcohol consumption, smoking, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal disorders, hospitalisations, injuries, gynecological and psychiatric problems [7], [8], [9], [10].
Most studies have focused on the period before and during pregnancy and only a few have reported domestic violence in the postpartum period. For instance, in one study the prevalence of moderate to severe violence was estimated to be 25% [11]. In another follow up study of 30 women who had reported abuse during pregnancy, 90% of the women reported a total of 57 abusive incidents 3 months after delivery [12]. These studies also suggest that the postpartum period involves an increased risk of moderate to severe violence.
In a paper by Ballard et al. [3] four distinct patterns are mentioned (1) no violence before pregnancy, but violence during pregnancy (violence starts), (2) violence both before and during pregnancy (violence continues), (3) violence before pregnancy but not during pregnancy (violence ceases) and (4) no violence either before or during pregnancy. An important next step must therefore be to investigate the pattern of physical abuse before, during and after pregnancy and establish how and if there is a correlation.
We have previously reported the frequency of threats, severity and pattern of physical and sexual abuse in pregnant women [13]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of threats, severity of physical and sexual abuse in the same group of women during the postpartum period.
Section snippets
Material
All of the women were recruited from an interview study of 207 Swedish-born pregnant women focusing on women’s health, social situation and the occurrence of domestic violence during pregnancy, as reported previously by Widding Hedin et al. [13]. During the interview study the women were informed about a follow-up study postpartum. In connection with their visit to the antenatal clinic 8 weeks postpartum, the women received a questionnaire which was distributed by the midwives of the clinic.
Method
The Severity of Violence Against Women Scale (SVAW) [14] translated into Swedish was used to measure the frequency of threats and severity of physical and sexual abuse. The introduction to the SVAW scale was as follows; ‘In all relations it probably happens that one has a conflict or feels anger. Has one of the following things happened to you after giving birth?’ Every woman was asked to rate the frequency of each action for both threats of, and actual acts of physical and sexual violence from
Results
The mean age of the women abused during pregnancy was 27 years while the mean age for the group abused postpartum was 29 years.
None of the women reported that abuse started in pregnancy. The percentages of non-responders in the follow-up study was 36% (75/207).
Discussion
The present investigation is the first European prevalence study on domestic violence among women in their postpartum period. It differs from previous American and Canadian studies [11], [12] in the sense that it is a follow-up of the same group of women who were investigated for abuse, prior to and during pregnancy, using the same research tool (SVAW scale). Compared to the first study [13] which was based on personal interviews, the response rate of the present questionnaire study decreased
Condensation
A postpartum follow-up of 207 Swedish women regarding domestic violence showed that such abuse may occur at any time in a woman’s reproductive life and that abuse is not related to the socio-demographic characteristics of the victims.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank all the women that made this study possible. This study was supported by grants from The Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority, Umeå, Sweden and The Swedish Foundation for Health Care Sciences and Allergy Research, Stockholm, Sweden. I also thank professor Per Olof Janson for valuable suggestions and criticism.
References (25)
- et al.
The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of new-born
Obstet Gynecol
(1995) - et al.
A prevalence survey of abuse and screening for abuse in urgent care patients
Obstet Gynecol
(1998) - et al.
Indicators of assault-related injuries among women presenting to the emergency department
Ann Emerg Med
(1998) - et al.
Nonbattering presentations to ED of women in physically abusive relationships
Am J Emerg Med
(1998) Domestic violence recognised as a world problem
J Am Med Assoc
(1998)- et al.
Violence during pregnancy: measurement issues
Am J Public Health
(1998) - et al.
Violence against women. The hidden health burden
- et al.
Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry onto prenatal care
J Am Med Assoc
(1992) Domestic violence: a public health crisis
Clin Obstet Gynecol
(1997)- et al.
Characteristics of participants in domestic violence. Assessment at the scene of domestic assault
J Am Med Assoc
(1997)