Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 388, Issue 10052, 1–7 October 2016, Pages 1427-1436
The Lancet

Series
Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4Get rights and content

Summary

Improvements in acute burn care have enabled patients to survive massive burns that would have once been fatal. Now up to 70% of patients develop hypertrophic scars after burns. The functional and psychosocial sequelae remain a major rehabilitative challenge, decreasing quality of life and delaying reintegration into society. Approaches to optimise healing potential of burn wounds use targeted wound care and surgery to minimise the development of hypertrophic scarring. Such approaches often fail, and modulation of the established scar is continued although the optimal indication, timing, and combination of therapies have yet to be established. The need for novel treatments is paramount, and future efforts to improve outcomes and quality of life should include optimisation of wound healing to attenuate or prevent hypertrophic scarring, well-designed trials to confirm treatment efficacy, and further elucidation of molecular mechanisms to allow development of new preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Introduction

Cutaneous scarring remains the pathognomonic feature after burns to the skin and characteristically underlies post-burn physical and psychosocial morbidity. The most common cicatrix formed after a burn is the hypertrophic scar, the prevalence of which is reportedly as high as 70%.1 During the past several decades, improvement in acute burn care has reduced mortality, enabling survival of burn injuries covering up to 100% of total body surface area (TBSA). Patients with these massive burns have extensive scarring and contractures, restricted movement, itch, and pain, might be dissatisfied with their appearance, and have loss of function for many years. The greatest unmet challenges in burn rehabilitation are decreased quality of life and delayed reintegration into society resulting from post-burn scar. In this second article in a Series on burns, we discuss strategies for burn wound and scar management and identify areas that need more research to reduce post-burn scarring and improve burn survivors’ rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Section snippets

Post-burn scarring

After cutaneous injury, the defect is healed through creation of a scar, with linear collagen deposition lacking the flexibility of uninjured skin. Although the desired result for any healing wound is scarless healing, the best result is usually a flat, pliable scar, with slight discoloration. Deposition of excess collagen results in a pathological scar that is thick, non-pliable, itchy, and painful.2 Two types of pathological scars can arise from the burn wound—a hypertrophic scar or a keloid.

Pathophysiology of wound healing and scarring

In postnatal tissue, wound healing occurs in three discrete phases that ultimately result in the formation of a scar: inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling.8 Modulation of the three phases can allow the wound to heal without scar or result in excessive fibrosis. Although a flat, less fibrotic scar is desired, when the acute inflammatory phase persists or wound healing is delayed, pathological scars form (panel). During the inflammatory phase, a fibrin clot forms, thereby creating a

Acute wound care

Clinical evidence suggests that time to healing is associated with burn wound depth. Most burn wounds—flash injuries and small scalds—are superficial second degree (partial-thickness) burns that usually result in an unobtrusive, non-hypertrophic scar.13, 14 Delayed healing of these wounds might result from infection or a known permutation of wound healing, such as diabetes or systemic corticosteroid use.15 Care for such wounds consists of washing with water and chlorhexidine or hand soap (an

Assessment of the impact of scar

To determine whether interventions are successful and effective in modulating burn scar, objective assessment techniques and experimental models are used. Although improvements in developing less subjective assessment techniques and more clinically relevant experimental models have provided the community with improved tools to study post-burn scarring, room for improvement remains. The impact of the scar cannot be fully understood through physical examination or histological evaluation.

Models to study post-burn scar

Elucidation of molecular mechanisms underlying hypertrophic scar, and effects of therapeutic interventions on the scarring process, has been limited largely to biopsies from human patients used for histology or derivation of skin cultures or cell cultures. The scarcity of animal models that heal and scar similarly to people has hindered research; however, several animal models have been developed that enable studies of hypertrophic scar. Female (or castrated male) red Duroc pigs develop

Non-surgical approaches to scar modification

Compression garments, massage, laser therapy, intense pulsed light, steroids, exercise, and injection of fat into the scar have been used to reduce hypertrophic scar.86 Because these therapies are not wholly effective on their own, patients might benefit from a combination of several approaches. If the scar remains problematic after manipulation, surgical revision is used to correct deficiencies and deformities. There is a paucity of data for cost-effectiveness of all burn scar treatments and

Genetics of burn scar

Although elucidation of the genetic component to scarring is in its infancy, DNA genotyping has been used to identify the variant genes associated with severity of hypertrophic scar. In a study114 of predominantly white males, a particular variant of the CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1 (CSMD1) gene was associated with less severe post-burn hypertrophic scarring. The protein produced by CSMD1 is a putative tumour suppressor, the expression of which is elevated in cells isolated from head and

Conclusion

Despite shortcomings of many studies on hypertrophic scarring, the studies we have presented in this Series paper have altered clinical care such that methods used to heal burn wounds and reduce post-burn hypertrophic scar are improving. When a severely burned patient is treated, prevention of hypertrophic scar is preferred over treatment of a resultant scar. The current approach of reducing hypertrophic scar formation with early acute surgical intervention and various non-surgical modalities,

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched PubMed for English language manuscripts published between January, 2006 and April, 2016, with combinations of the keywords “burn”, “thermal”, “cicatrix”, “hypertrophic”, and “keloid” in the abstract, title, or both. From this search result, we preferentially selected manuscripts in which large cohorts of patients with appropriate control groups had been studied. Because of the limitations on space, we cited review articles from the past 5–10 years—as opposed to primary

References (114)

  • WW Monafo

    Tangential excision

    Clin Plast Surg

    (1974)
  • A Pirayesh et al.

    Glyaderm((R)) dermal substitute: clinical application and long-term results in 55 patients

    Burns

    (2015)
  • X Li et al.

    Human acellular dermal matrix allograft: a randomized, controlled human trial for the long-term evaluation of patients with extensive burns

    Burns

    (2015)
  • M Haberal et al.

    The use of silver nitrate-incorporated amniotic membrane as a temporary dressing

    Burns Incl Therm Inj

    (1987)
  • C Uhlig et al.

    Suprathel-an innovative, resorbable skin substitute for the treatment of burn victims

    Burns

    (2007)
  • H Schwarze et al.

    Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts: results of a clinical study

    Burns

    (2007)
  • G Gravante et al.

    A randomized trial comparing ReCell system of epidermal cells delivery versus classic skin grafts for the treatment of deep partial thickness burns

    Burns

    (2007)
  • CJ Zweifel et al.

    Initial experiences using non-cultured autologous keratinocyte suspension for burn wound closure

    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

    (2008)
  • L Rosenberg et al.

    A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT

    Burns

    (2014)
  • H Tan et al.

    Effective use of Biobrane as a temporary wound dressing prior to definitive split-skin graft in the treatment of severe burn: a retrospective analysis

    Burns

    (2015)
  • N Brusselaers et al.

    Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of objective scar assessment tools

    Burns

    (2010)
  • GA Mecott et al.

    Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients

    J Surg Res

    (2015)
  • Z Tyack et al.

    Measuring the impact of burn scarring on health-related quality of life: development and preliminary content validation of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) for children and adults

    Burns

    (2015)
  • JY Kim et al.

    Novel burn device for rapid, reproducible burn wound generation

    Burns

    (2016)
  • F Syed et al.

    Ex vivo evaluation of antifibrotic compounds in skin scarring: EGCG and silencing of PAI-1 independently inhibit growth and induce keloid shrinkage

    Lab Invest

    (2013)
  • IH Bellayr et al.

    Scarless wound healing

    J Am Coll Certif Wound Spec

    (2010)
  • HA Linares et al.

    Historical notes on the use of pressure in the treatment of hypertrophic scars or keloids

    Burns

    (1993)
  • LH Candy et al.

    Effect of different pressure magnitudes on hypertrophic scar in a Chinese population

    Burns

    (2010)
  • LH Engrav et al.

    12-Year within-wound study of the effectiveness of custom pressure garment therapy

    Burns

    (2010)
  • A Anzarut et al.

    The effectiveness of pressure garment therapy for the prevention of abnormal scarring after burn injury: a meta-analysis

    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

    (2009)
  • S Monstrey et al.

    Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures

    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

    (2014)
  • FB Niessen et al.

    On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1999)
  • R Ogawa

    The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2010)
  • GG Gauglitz et al.

    Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies

    Mol Med

    (2011)
  • AE Slemp et al.

    Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management

    Curr Opin Pediatr

    (2006)
  • GV Oliveira et al.

    Hypertrophic versus non hypertrophic scars compared by immunohistochemistry and laser confocal microscopy: type I and III collagens

    Int Wound J

    (2009)
  • D Son et al.

    Overview of surgical scar prevention and management

    J Korean Med Sci

    (2014)
  • LY Kerwin et al.

    Scar prevention and remodeling: a review of the medical, surgical, topical and light treatment approaches

    Int J Dermatol

    (2014)
  • EA Deitch et al.

    Hypertrophic burn scars: analysis of variables

    J Trauma

    (1983)
  • S Guo et al.

    Factors affecting wound healing

    J Dent Res

    (2010)
  • AN Neely et al.

    Are topical antimicrobials effective against bacteria that are highly resistant to systemic antibiotics?

    J Burn Care Res

    (2009)
  • ZM Rashaan et al.

    Nonsilver treatment vs. silver sulfadiazine in treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Wound Repair Regen

    (2014)
  • J Wasiak et al.

    Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2013)
  • CS Dunkin et al.

    Scarring occurs at a critical depth of skin injury: precise measurement in a graduated dermal scratch in human volunteers

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (2007)
  • AD Jaskille et al.

    Critical review of burn depth assessment techniques: part II. Review of laser doppler technology

    J Burn Care Res

    (2010)
  • Z Janzekovic

    A new concept in the early excision and immediate grafting of burns

    J Trauma

    (1970)
  • DN Herndon et al.

    A comparison of conservative versus early excision. Therapies in severely burned patients

    Ann Surg

    (1989)
  • LK Branski et al.

    Longitudinal assessment of Integra in primary burn management: a randomized pediatric clinical trial

    Crit Care Med

    (2007)
  • DM Heimbach et al.

    Multicenter postapproval clinical trial of Integra dermal regeneration template for burn treatment

    J Burn Care Rehabil

    (2003)
  • RE Salisbury et al.

    Biological dressings and evaporative water loss from burn wounds

    Ann Plast Surg

    (1980)
  • Cited by (414)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text