Adult UrologyRole of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma
Section snippets
Patients
The study cohort was selected from a group of 290 patients with pathologic Stage T3 prostate cancer treated with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1987 and 1989 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. This interval was selected to include only patients with preoperative serum PSA determination (begun in 1987 at Mayo Clinic) and extended follow-up. Preoperative TNM clinical stage was assigned for all patients on the basis of the results of bone scan, digital
Patient characteristics
The mean patient age at prostatectomy was 67.3 years (range 40 to 79). The median preoperative PSA was 10.0 ng/mL (range 0.7 to 105.0) (Table I). The mean patient follow-up after surgery was 7.1 years (± 1.8 years SD). At the close of the study, 43 patients had died, including 9 of prostate cancer.
Correlation of OMVD with other prognostic factors
The mean OMVD was 65.0 (range 31.6 to 154.6), and the median AWMVD was 8.2 (range 0.6 to 46.0). OMVD and AWMVD were not significantly associated with DNA ploidy, preoperative PSA, seminal vesicle
Comment
Although the goal of radical prostatectomy is complete eradication of prostate cancer, 33% to 42% of clinically organ-confined cancers have pathologic evidence of extraprostatic disease.1, 2, 3, 4, 6 Extraprostatic extension of cancer after radical prostatectomy increases the risk of recurrence, although some patients have a better postoperative course than others,1, 2, 6 and the prediction of outcome is often difficult in this group of patients. Adjuvant therapy in these patients is
Conclusions
Microvessel density analysis, assessed by OMVD and AWMVD, did not improve prediction of cancer recurrence in our cohort of patients with pT3 prostate cancer. OMVD and AWMVD were not significantly associated with DNA ploidy, preoperative PSA, seminal vesicle involvement, or surgical margin status; however, AWMVD was significantly associated with Gleason grade. Cancer recurrence in our cohort of patients with pathologic Stage T3 (TNM staging system, 1997 revision) adenocarcinoma of the prostate
References (29)
- et al.
Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy for clinical stage C prostatic cancerrole of adjuvant treatment for residual cancer and in disease progression
J Urol
(1986) - et al.
Disease recurrence and progression in untreated pathologic stage T3 prostate cancerselecting the patient for adjuvant therapy
J Urol
(1997) - et al.
Extended experience with radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate canceroutcome and contemporary morbidity
J Urol
(1995) Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease
J Urol
(1994)- et al.
Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer
J Urol
(1994) - et al.
Stage C prostatic adenocarcinomaflow cytometric nuclear DNA ploidy analysis
Mayo Clin Proc
(1989) - et al.
Radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage C prostate cancerinfluence of pathologic variables and adjuvant treatment on disease outcome
Urology
(1993) - et al.
Influence of DNA ploidy and adjuvant treatment on progression and survival in patients with pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy
Urology
(1995) - et al.
Prostate specific antigen values after radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostateimpact of adjuvant treatment (hormonal and radiation)
J Urol
(1991) - et al.
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicledefinition and relation of tumor volume, grade, and margins of resection to prognosis
J Urol
(1993)
Optimized microvessel density analysis improves prediction of cancer stage from prostate needle biopsies
Urology
Prediction of patient outcome in pathologic stage T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostatelack of significance for microvessel density analysis
Urology
Measurement of serum prostatic specific antigen using ImX prostate specific antigen assay
J Urol
Staging errors in clinically localized prostatic cancer
J Urol
Cited by (53)
Angiogenesis and prostate cancer: MicroRNAs comes into view
2023, Pathology Research and PracticeHypoxia and angiogenic biomarkers in prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BTb)
2019, Radiotherapy and OncologyCitation Excerpt :One study used Factor VIII related antigen to assess MVD and found an increased MVD was associated with a significantly worse BRFS in localised prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiotherapy [24]. In contrast we did not demonstrate high MVD (CD34) expression to be a predictor of outcome, and this is in keeping with findings from several other groups [25–28]. Although high MVD did not predict for a worse BRFS overall, it did identify patients who benefitted from dose escalation.
Angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in prostate cancer
2013, Critical Reviews in Oncology/HematologyCitation Excerpt :Only articles published in English were considered. Microvessel density in prostate cancer, a histological measure of tumor angiogenesis, has been shown to correlate with Gleason score and predict disease progression [8,12]. Whether neovascularization is a primary pathogenic event or a response to the hypoxic microenvironment of a growing tumor, this observation provides a rationale for investigating anti-angiogenic therapy as a treatment strategy for this disease.
Microvessel density is not increased in prostate cancer: Digital imaging of routine sections and tissue microarrays
2013, Human PathologyCitation Excerpt :Initial reports have shown increased angiogenesis in PC and a correlation with tumor grade, stage, progression, and survival [6-10]. However, further studies have failed to confirm the independent prognostic value of MVD counts [5,11-13]. An increased expression of endothelial markers in PC when compared to benign lesions is not firmly established [14-16].
Immunohistology of the Prostate, Bladder, Kidney, and Testis
2011, Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry