EPIDEMIOLOGY: Hip and Knee

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70073-0Get rights and content

Intraoperative and postoperative periprosthetic fractures appear to be increasing in number.20, 32, 56 Intraoperative fractures have become more common with the advent of uncemented press-fit implants.20 Postoperative fractures have also become more common as the population of at-risk patients with joint arthroplasty has increased.20 The number of patients living with hip and knee arthroplasties has risen considerably over the last two decades, and after several decades of joint arthroplasty, the number of patients with multiply revised joints, bone loss, and osteolysis has also risen.

This article reviews the epidemiologic features of periprosthetic fractures around total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty according to the site of fracture occurrence. The frequency and cause of intraoperative and postoperative periprosthetic fractures vary by anatomic site. For each anatomic site, unique risk factors, some demographic and some technical, appear to be related to risk of fracture. For several anatomic sites, excellent articles that collate large numbers of series are available to the reader and provide aggregate information concerning the epidemiology of these fractures.13, 29, 31, 37, 53, 56 From a broad perspective, there is little information in the literature on the relative frequency of periprosthetic fractures at each anatomic site. To provide some perspective, this article also makes use of previously unpublished data from the Mayo Clinic total joint registry.*

Section snippets

Intraoperative

Intraoperative periprosthetic acetabular fractures are a phenomenon ascribable to use of press-fit uncemented acetabular components. The fractures vary in severity from minor cracks involving only the rim of the socket to major disruptions of the pelvis. The overall incidence of the problem is unknown.8 The only series reported to date included only 13 fractures gathered from three institutions, suggesting that major intraoperative acetabular fractures are uncommon. Women predominated in that

PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES AROUND TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

As is the case for total hip arthroplasty, figures for the rate of periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty are difficult to obtain from the literature because such figures depend on many factors, including (1) length of follow-up time, (2) demographic makeup of the patient population, (3) total knee arthroplasty design, (4) techniques of insertion, and (5) whether the patella was resurfaced. To date, the author is aware of no studies that have reviewed the overall rate of

PERIPROSTHETIC TIBIA FRACTURES

Little has been written about periprosthetic tibial fractures around total knee arthroplasty. A Mayo Clinic report on the subject identified 102 fractures, 19 of which were intraoperative and 83 postoperative.16 The fractures occurred in 73 women and 29 men.

Intraoperative tibial fractures were observed during tibial preparation, trial reduction, and implant placement as well as during cement removal in revision total knee arthroplasty. Insertion and removal of long-stem implants accounted for

PERIPROSTHETIC PATELLAR FRACTURES

Almost all patellar fractures associated with primary total knee arthroplasty occur postoperatively, although patellar fractures can occur intraoperatively during revision surgery. In the Mayo Clinic joint registry, no intraoperative patellar fractures were identified in 16,906 primary total knee arthroplasties, and only 8 were reported in 2904 revision total knee arthroplasties (see Table 2).

The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures varies in different series.10, 31, 44 Healy et

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic fractures around the hip and knee arthroplasties are being seen with increasing frequency. The prevalence and risk factors for fracture vary by anatomic site. The frequency of certain fracture types and locations are technique or implant design specific, whereas for other fracture types and locations the frequency and cause relate to bone quality and risk of trauma. An emerging problem, fractures associated with periprosthetic bone loss and osteolysis have now been reported

References (56)

  • P. Adolphson et al.

    Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty

    Arch Orthop Trauma

    (1987)
  • R.K. Beals et al.

    Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: An analysis of 93 fractures

    Clin Orthop

    (1996)
  • Berry DJ. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint Surg 1998,...
  • J.S. Bethea et al.

    Proximal femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1982)
  • G.W. Brick et al.

    The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1988)
  • P.R. Cain et al.

    Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1986)
  • J.J. Callaghan

    Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum during and following total hip arthroplasty

    Instr Course Lect

    (1998)
  • C.M. Christensen et al.

    Management of intraoperative femur fractures associated with revision hip arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1989)
  • M.L. Clayton et al.

    Patellar complications after total condylar arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1982)
  • P.H. Cooke et al.

    Fractures of the femur in relation to cemented hip prostheses

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1988)
  • R.W. Culp et al.

    Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1987)
  • A.M. DiGioia et al.

    Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty: A literature review and treatment algorithm

    Clin Orthop

    (1991)
  • J.J. Elting et al.

    Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1995)
  • G.A. Engh et al.

    Periprosthetic fractures adjacent to total knee implants: Treatment and clinical results

    Instr Course Lect

    (1998)
  • N.A. Felix et al.

    Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty

    Clin Orthop

    (1997)
  • M.P. Figgle et al.

    The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty

    J Arthroplasty

    (1990)
  • R.H. Fitzgerald et al.

    The uncemented total hip arthroplasty: Intraoperative femoral fractures

    Clin Orthop

    (1988)
  • H.O. Fredin et al.

    Femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1987)
  • Cited by (490)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Address reprint requests to Daniel J. Berry, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905

    *

    Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

    *

    Data from the Mayo Clinic joint registry are used in this article to provide figures on the relative frequency of different types of fractures (see Tables 1 and 2). The data do not provide absolute prevalence information because they represent all hip and knee arthroplasties done at the Mayo Clinic to date, some performed recently and some performed more than two decades ago. Furthermore, the data represent minimal figures because some fractures treated elsewhere may not have been identified. The data include only fractures identified after primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty done at the Mayo Clinic and do not include fractures referred for treatment after arthroplasty elsewhere. Finally, the figures represent raw data from the total joint registry, and each case has not been individually reviewed by the author.

    View full text