Elsevier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volume 74, Issue 5, November 2002, Pages S1870-S1872
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Original article: aortic surgery symposium
The impact of spinal angiography on the neurological outcome after surgery on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta

Presented at the Aortic Surgery Symposium VIII, May 2–3, 2002, New York, NY.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04149-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Neurologic complications remain one of the major concerns in surgery on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. The impact of preoperative spinal angiography on postoperative neurologic outcome was assessed.

Methods

Between September 1993 and December 1999, 109 patients (mean age, 58.2 years; range, 24 to 77) underwent preoperative spinal angiography: 50 (45.9%) for aneurysm and 59 (54.1%) for chronic dissection. Sixty-one patients (56.0%) underwent replacement of the descending thoracic aorta whereas the thoracoabdominal aorta was replaced in 48 (44.0%) patients. All intercostal or lumbar arteries that had previously been visualized as the origin of the great radicular artery (GRA) were preserved.

Results

The origin of the GRA was located by spinal angiography in 65 of the 109 patients (59.6%). It was found between level T-5 and L-3 and on the left side in 75.4% (49 of 65) patients. In patients with aneurysms, it was identified less frequently (48%) compared with patients with chronic dissection (69.5%,p = 0.02). The overall operative mortality rate was 5.5% (6 of 109 patients). There were 7 patients (6.4%) with postoperative paraplegia. In 3 of them the origin of the GRA had been reimplanted.

Conclusions

Even in patients with an identified and subsequently reimplanted GRA, postoperative paraplegia could not always be prevented. Spinal angiography has no impact on the neurologic outcome of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement.

Section snippets

Patient population

Between September 1993 and December 1999, 109 patients underwent preoperative spinal angiography before descending and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement according to the neuroradiological technique described previously [3]. Patient-related preoperative variables are summarized in Table 1. In 61 patients (56%), aortic pathology was limited to the descending aorta whereas the thoracoabdominal segment was affected in 48 patients (44%). On the basis of the classification by Crawford and

Spinal angiographical results

The origin of the GRA was located by spinal angiography in 65 of 109 patients (59.6%). It was found between T-5 and L-3, and the most common source was the left 11th intercostal artery (16 of 65, 24.6%). In the majority of the patients, it was identified on the left side of the respective intercostal or lumbar artery (49 of 65 patients, 75.4%) and between T-8 and L-2 (62 of 65 patients, 95.4%).

The rate of identification in patients with aneurysms (24 of 50 patients, 48.0%) was lower than that

Comment

The role of the GRA for maintenance of spinal cord blood supply is controversial [5]. In this study, preoperative identification of the GRA had no impact on the incidence of severe postoperative neurologic complications after descending or thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. This result indicates the importance of other risk factors such as perioperative hypotension, duration of intraoperative spinal cord ischemia or thromboembolism of collaterals to the anterior spinal artery.

ISA reattachment

Cited by (46)

  • Neuromonitoring during descending aorta procedures

    2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is also more time-consuming than MRA. Furthermore, as the MRA quality has significantly improved, angiography for preoperative planning is now rarely used (Heinemann et al., 1998; Kieffer et al., 2002; Minatoya et al., 2002). In summary, regardless of the imaging technique used, identifying the artery of Adamkiewicz and patent segmental arteries and collaterals, in conjunction with the information on the type and extent of the aneurysm is important for preoperative planning.

  • Low Back Disorders

    2020, Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Spinal Cord Ischemia after Endovascular Aortic Repair of a Unilateral Iliac Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: A Case Report

    2019, Annals of Vascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The caudal part receives supply from branches of the inferior mesenteric, internal iliac, and sacral arteries. Minatoya et al.5 reported 109 patients who underwent preoperative spinal angiography and found that ARM originated between T5 and L3 level and from the left side in 75% of the patients. Koshino et al.6 performed minute dissection on 102 formol-fixed adult cadavers without any history of circulatory disorders.

  • A rare case of paraplegia complicating a lumbar epidural infiltration

    2010, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Advances in Imaging of the Spinal Cord Vascular Supply and its Relationship with Paraplegia after Aortic Interventions. A Review

    2009, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The aetiology of perioperative SC ischaemia is multi-factorial, and various efforts to reduce this complication have been made, including improving surgical technique12 (sequential clamping,13 prevention of steal phenomenon13–15 and intercostal artery re-implantation1,16,17), adjuncts (distal perfusion,2,3,13,17 hypothermia,2,13 cerebrospinal fluid drainage,2,3,7,13,18–21 etc.), monitoring (motor-evoked potentials2,14,21–24) and anaesthesia (rapid infusion systems, vital parameters monitoring,7,13 arterial pressure management,2,7,13,18,21 pharmacological strategies,7,13 etc.). Although strategies for preventing SC injury have evolved steadily since the 1980s, paraplegia has not been eliminated.2,7,20,25,26 Accurate preoperative knowledge of the arterial supply to the SC would be extremely useful for procedure planning and risk stratification.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text