Clinical study
Screening for common problems in ambulatory elderly: Clinical confirmation of a screening instrument**

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89520-4Get rights and content

Purpose

To develop a test that will be administered by nonphysician office staff to screen elderly persons seen in ambulatory settings for problems commonly contributing to functional disability.

methods

We reviewed the literature to identify problems that reduce function and screening measures appropriate for use in office settings. Using this information, we developed an instrument including screening items for malnutrition/weight loss, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, depression, physical disability, and reduced leg mobility. The instrument was tested on 109 new patients at a university-based ambulatory geriatrics medicine clinic and validated using two standards: blinded and unblinded geriatricians' assessments. For each of the individual items on the screening instrument, we calculated sensitivity and specificity using both the blinded and unblinded geriatricians' evaluations as the reference standards, prevalence of the disorders, positive and negative predictive values, interrater reliability, and the direct annual costs of administering the test for an individual physician's office.

Results

The screen was administered in 8 to 12 minutes. Inter-rater agreement varied by item from 77% to 100%. The sensitivities of the items varied between 0.65 to 0.93 (blinded) and 0.70 to 0.95 (unblinded). Specificities ranged between 0.50 to 0.95 (blinded) and 0.64 to 0.95 (unblinded). Problem prevalences varied from 21% to 72%. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.60 to 0.91 and 0.77 to 0.96, respectively. Direct annual costs for a clinical practice include a one-time $530 fee for equipment and, depending on the screening administrator's salary, between $1 to $7 per patient screened.

Conclusions

The screening instrument is relatively inexpensive and brief and easy to use in the ambulatory setting. It has good validity and reliability when compared to the assessment of a geriatrician. We are currently conducting a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of the screen among older persons seen in community physicians' offices.

References (31)

  • RubensteinLV et al.

    Health status assessment for elderly patients: report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Health Assessment

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1989)
  • RubensteinLV et al.

    Improving patient function: a randomized trial of functional disability screening

    Ann Intern Med

    (1989)
  • WassonJ et al.

    The short-term effect of patient health status assessment in a health maintenance organization

    Qual Life Res

    (1992)
  • JetteAM et al.

    The Functional Status Questionnaire: relia-bility and validity when used in primary care

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1986)
  • NelsonEC et al.

    The functional status of patients: how can it be measured in physicians' offices?

    Med Care

    (1990)
  • Cited by (84)

    • Application of a World Health Organization 10-minute screening tool in eastern Taiwan-Falls and self-rated health status among community-dwelling elderly

      2015, Tzu Chi Medical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the positive and negative predictive values of the two items assessing urinary incontinence were 0.86 and 0.96, respectively. Those for the 3-item memory recall test were 0.60 and 0.92, respectively [26]. All of the results in this study are in agreement with those of previous studies related to the prevalence of falling, urinary incontinence, and depression in an elderly population in Taiwan.

    • Physical function and quality of life in frail and/or elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine and bevacizumab: An exploratory analysis

      2014, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the components of the questionnaire is a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS), where the respondent is asked to indicate his or her health state by drawing a line from the origin box to a vertical line numbered 0 (at the bottom indicating worst possible health state) and 100 (at the top indicating best possible health state).21 Overall geriatric health was measured using a brief comprehensive geriatric health questionnaire (CGO) as described by Moore et al.22 This questionnaire is a self-administered battery of eleven items that was developed to screen elderly patients for eight common geriatric problems (malnutrition/weight loss, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, depression, physical disability, and reduced leg mobility) that may adversely affect function and for which intervention may improve patient outcomes. It was prospectively tested in a university geriatric medicine clinic and shown to have good validity and reliability when comparing blinded and unblinded geriatrician's assessments.

    • Opinion on opinions about geriatric assessment

      2012, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
    • Preventive Health Care Among Older Women in an Academic Primary Care Practice

      2008, Women's Health Issues
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have examined ways to improve health promotion among adults in primary care (Dubey, Mathew, Iglar, Moineddin, & Glazier, 2006; Robinson, Barry, Renick, Bergin, & Stratos, 2001). Recommendations include physician education seminars (Kerse, Flicker, Jolley, Arroll, & Young, 1999), preventive health check lists (Miller et al., 2000; Moore & Siu, 1996), computer reminders (Dexter et al., 2001), use of nonphysician staff to screen for disease (Moore, Siu, Partridge, Hayes, & Adams, 1997), addressing preventive health topics at multiple visits (Reuben, Roth, Kamberg, & Wenger, 2003), and maintaining a periodic health examination (Sox, Dietrich, Tosteson, Winchell, & Labaree, 1997). In our practice, we use computer reminders and preventive health check lists to help improve delivery of preventive health services to our patients.

    • Geriatric Medicine

      2008, Physician Assistant
    • Geriatric Medicine

      2008, Physician Assistant: A Guide to Clinical Practice Expert Consult - Online and Print
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    **

    This project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program.

    View full text