Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 16, Issue 5, 1995, Pages 381-387
Biomaterials

Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage response

https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)98855-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The behaviour of two biomaterials polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene (PL) has been studied, focussing especially on the macrophage response to the implant, as well as on certain aspects of the process of scar formation. A total of 24 animals (white New Zealand rabbits) received prostheses implanted into the anterior abdominal wall in such a way as to involve every layer over an area of 7cm × 5cm. The interfaces formed with the visceral peritoneum, subcutaneous tissue layer and the recipient muscle-aponeurotic tissue were assessed. The techniques employed were light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemical methods, the latter using a monoclonal antibody specific for rabbit macrophages (RAM-11). From the results obtained, it can be seen that: (a) the structure of PL allows its total integration with the reparative tissue, while PTFE becomes encapsulated, on both the subcutaneous and the peritoneal aspects, by orderly connective tissue; (b) the macrophage response, determined on the basis of the presence of labelled macrophages, shows a similar pattern in both biomaterials; and (c) angiogenesis is very intense in the PL mesh, whereas the PTFE prosthesis undergoes almost no vascular colonization.

References (19)

  • A Ar'Rajab et al.

    Phosphatidyl choline prevents postoperative peritoneal adhesions: an experimental study in rat

    J Surg Res

    (1991)
  • B Van der Lei et al.

    Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of large abdominal wall defects

    Br J Surg

    (1989)
  • RG Molloy et al.

    Massive incisional hernia: abdominal wall replacement with Marlex mesh

    Br J Surg

    (1991)
  • NW Law

    A comparison of polypropylene mesh, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch and polyglycolic acid mesh for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects

    Acta Chir Scand

    (1990)
  • JS Budd et al.

    Attachment of indium-111 labelled endothelial cells to pretreated polytetrafluoroethylene vascular grafts

    Br J Surg

    (1989)
  • A Pans et al.

    A comparison of intraperitoneal prostheses for the repair of abdominal muscular wall defects in rats

    Eur Surg Res

    (1992)
  • NH Law et al.

    A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects. An experimental study

    Surgery

    (1991)
  • R Simmermacher et al.

    The risk of reherniation in the repair of abdominal wall defects. Polypropylene mesh versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

  • SJ Leibovich et al.

    The role of the macrophage in wound repair

    Am J Pathol

    (1975)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (109)

  • Modeling of anisotropic hyperelastic heterogeneous knitted fabric reinforced composites

    2019, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
    Citation Excerpt :

    Knitted fabrics are foremost preferred because they are highly flexible and do not easily fray (Dinh et al., 2018), they also offer a broad range of structures and associated mechanical behaviors. Following the implantation, the healing process of the biological tissues in contact with the textile implant, takes place, going together with the growth and colonization of scar tissues around the mesh (Bellón et al., 1995). A new composite made of the implant, the native and healed tissues replaces the initial native tissues and should provide a non-pathological physiological behavior.

  • Polypropylene prostheses coated with silver nanoclusters/silica coating obtained by sputtering: Biocompatibility and antibacterial properties

    2017, Surface and Coatings Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Inflammation after mesh positioning is a normal phase in wound healing, as also is the foreign body reaction. It has been shown that all meshes cause initial acute inflammation in proximity to the implant, [8] and that this is associated with early mesh integration [9,10]. Moreover, the degree of inflammation closely correlates with connective tissue formation [8,11].

  • Experimental study of the mechanical behavior of an explanted mesh: The influence of healing

    2017, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text