Protective role of glutathione and glutathione transferases in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(88)90197-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH) alone detoxifies electrophiles with an effectiveness which depends on the rate of the reaction and the concentration of GSH. If electrophiles are substrates for GSH transferase isoenzymes, the effectiveness of detoxication is much enhanced due to the increased rate of reaction and it is also independent of GSH concentration to low levels of GSH depletion, since the Km for GSH is approximately 0.1 mM. In this paper detoxication of electrophilic metabolites of the hepatocarcinogen N-methyl-4-aminoazobenzene which are not substrates for GSH transferases and the carcinogenic electrophile derived from the hepatocarcinogen aflatoxin B1 which is a poor substrate is compared with detoxication of electrophiles which are good substrates and which although bacterial mutagens are not carcinogenic in organs containing the appropriate GSH transferases. GSH transferases detoxify not only electrophiles derived from xenobiotics, but also endogenous electrophiles which are usually the consequence of free radical damage in the presence of oxygen to lipids and DNA and include lipid and DNA hydroperoxides and alkenals arising from the decomposition of lipid hydroperoxides.

Studies in the rat and other mammals show the GSH transferases to be dimers in which the subunits are members of a gene super-family. There are three, perhaps four multigene families namely, alpha containing subunits 1, 2, 8 and 10; mu containing subunits 3, 4 6 and 9; pi containing subunit 7 and subunits 5 and 5 which are so far unassigned. Subunit 5 is apparently restricted to the nucleus and is noteworthy for its activity towards DNA hydroperoxides. Studies in the human are not as advanced as in the rat but so far reveal close similarities.

The ability of GSH transferases to detoxify electrophiles is important in carcinogenesis at a number of points. They may inhibit initiation and tumour proportion, but they may be advantageous to the developing tumour cell, and may be acquired in increased amounts during malignant progression. In many tumour cells the development of lines resistant to anticancer drugs is associated with an increased expression of GSH transferases, particularly GSH transferase π in human cells.

References (129)

  • A.J. Baars et al.

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol.

    (1981)
  • G. Batist et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • R.F. Burk et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1980)
  • L.F. Chasseaud

    Adv. Cancer Res.

    (1979)
  • B. Coles et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (1983)
  • B. Coles et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (1987)
  • B. Coles et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1988)
  • W. Dekant et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (1986)
  • D.M. Dulik et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1986)
  • L.C. Eriksson et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1983)
  • A.J. Hussey et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1986)
  • W.B. Jakoby et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1984)
  • H. Jensson et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1986)
  • B. Ketterer et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interac.

    (1982)
  • H.-C.J. Lai et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • R.A. Lawrence et al.

    J. Nutr.

    (1978)
  • J. Loscalzo et al.

    Blood

    (1986)
  • J.H.N. Meerman et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (1982)
  • D.J. Meyer et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1982)
  • D.J. Meyer et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1984)
  • D.J. Meyer et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1985)
  • H.P. Misra

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1974)
  • J.A. Nash et al.

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1984)
  • W.R. Pearson et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1983)
  • C.B. Pickett et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • J.A. Redick et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1982)
  • D.M. Rhoads et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1987)
  • T.H. Rushmore et al.

    Cancer Lett.

    (1984)
  • C.S. Schasteen et al.

    Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • T.R. Scott et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1987)
  • M. Abramovitz et al.

    J. Neurochem.

    (1988)
  • B.N. Ames et al.

    Genetic Toxicology of Environmental Chemicals

  • R.N. Armstrong

    CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.

    (1987)
  • B.A. Arrick et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1984)
  • K. Ashgar et al.

    J. Histochem. Cytochem.

    (1975)
  • Y.C. Awasthi et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (1988)
  • F.a. Beland et al.

    Chem.-Biol. Interact.

    (1980)
  • A.M. Benson et al.

    Cancer Res.

    (1978)
  • J.E. Biaglow et al.

    Radiat. Res.

    (1983)
  • H.S. Black

    Lipids

    (1980)
  • P.G. Board

    Ann. Hum. Genet.

    (1981)
  • B. Coles

    Drug Metab. Rev.

    (1984–1985)
  • B. Coles et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (1985)
  • I.G. Cowell et al.

    Biochem. J.

    (1988)
  • U.H. Danielson et al.

    Biochem. J.

    (1987)
  • G. Del Boccio et al.

    Ital. J. Biochem.

    (1987)
  • C. Di Ilio et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (1987)
  • G.J.-F. Ding et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1985)
  • P. Di Simplicio et al.

    Acta Chem. Scand.

    (1983)
  • Z. Djuric et al.

    Carcinogenesis

    (1987)
  • Cited by (437)

    • Multidimensional bioresponses in nematodes contribute to the antagonistic toxic interaction between pentachlorophenol and TiO<inf>2</inf> nanoparticles in soil

      2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      This result indicated that nematodes tended to counteract PCP and nTiO2 via GSH-GST dependent detoxification pathway and GSH-dependent detoxification pathway, respectively. After PCP exposure, the specifically increased GST activity in nematodes could catalyze the conjugation of PCP with GSH to form water-soluble substances for detoxification (Ketterer, 1988); when exposed to nTiO2, stimulated reduction of GSSG to GSH and increased GR activity could strengthen the intracellular reductive defense of nematodes to against nTiO2-induced oxidative stress (Cai et al., 2021). Notably, the GST activity, GSH/GSSG ratio, and GR activity all increased in the PCP-nTiO2 co-exposure group, suggesting a combined consequence under the co-contamination condition.

    • Germline polymorphisms and the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms

      2019, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However other studies did not confirm this association [22,23,27,30,31.]]. Another detoxifying enzyme glutathione S-transferase (GST) has been a subject of investigation because GSTs catalyze the conjugation of electrophilic compounds to glutathione and alkylating agents are known substrates of GSTs [32]. GSTT1 and GSTM1 encode two classes of GST enzymes and deletion of these genes is relatively common in the general population [33,34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text