PaperIntramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures
References (23)
- et al.
External fixation of femoral fractures. Indications and limitations
Clin. Orthop.
(1989) - et al.
Plates versus external fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures. A randomized trial
Clin. Orthop.
(1989) - et al.
Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures: a prospective randomized study
J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]
(1989) - et al.
Intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the femoral shaft
J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]
(1989) The role of intramedullary fixation in open fractures
Clin. Orthop.
(1986)- et al.
Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures
Orthop. Trans.
(1982) - et al.
Fractures of the femoral shaft treated by external fixation with the Wagner Device
J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]
(1984) - et al.
Early osteosynthesis and prophylactic mechanical ventilation in the multitrauma patient
J. Trauma
(1982) - et al.
Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg [Am]
(1976) - et al.
Lower infection rate after interlocking nailing in open fractures of femur and tibia
J. Trauma
(1990)
Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur
J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]
(1985)
Cited by (20)
Unplanned reoperation is common following intramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective review
2024, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaIncidence of deep infection, union and malunion for open diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures treated with IM nailing: A systematic review
2019, SurgeonCitation Excerpt :The ICC was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99), indicating a nearly perfect agreement between the assessors (Table 4). Union rate data was abstracted from 15 studies irrespective of the timing of fracture fixation (early or delayed IMN).15,16,18–21,23,25,26,28–32 Pooled estimate of effect size for union rate was 97% (95% CI: 94–99%), random effects model, in the presence of significant statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 68.5%, Q = 44.5, df = 14, p < 0.001) (Table 5).
Fat embolism: the reaming controversy
2006, InjuryA Rare Case of Open (Gustilo II) Periprosthetic Fracture (Vancouver B2) in a Polytraumatized Patient
2023, Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.