Abstract
The number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) approaching an older age, together with the number of over-60-year-old patients newly diagnosed with IBD, is steadily increasing, reaching 25% of all patients. The present review focuses on late-onset ulcerative colitis (UC) and its initial disease course in comparison with that observed in younger adults in terms of extension at onset and the risk of proximal disease progression, medical treatment, surgery and hospitalization in the first years after diagnosis. We summarize the clues pointing to a milder disease course in a population which frequently presents major frailty due to comorbidities. With increasing age and thus increasing comorbidities, medical and surgical therapies frequently represent a challenge for treating physicians. The response, persistence, and risks of adverse events of conventional therapies indicated for late onset/older UC patients are examined, emphasizing the risks in this particular population, who are still being treated with prolonged corticosteroid therapy. Finally, we concentrate on data on biotechnological agents for which older patients were mostly excluded from pivotal trials. Real-life data from newer agents such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab show encouraging efficacy and safety profiles in the population of older UC patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
The number of older patients with ulcerative colitis is rising constantly, representing a challenge for physicians. |
Immunomodulators and anti-TNF therapies may be burdened by a higher risk of adverse events including infections and malignancies in this age group . |
Newer biological therapies and therapies with JAK inhibitors seem to be safer, but more data in older patients are needed. |
1 Introduction
A large database including approximately 56 million US citizens reported increasing incidence data over a 10-year period (2005–2015), placing ulcerative colitis (UC) with onset at ≥60 years of age at the top of all IBD diagnoses with 16–22 cases/100,000 person-years, followed by adults (aged 26–59 years) with 12–20 cases/100,000 person-years [1]. In the Danish National registry, UC onset in older patients accounts for 21% of all IBD diagnoses [2] and in the Netherlands, the proportion of UC patients with an onset at age ≥60 years, diagnosed between 1991 and 2010, was 22.5% [3]. Incidence rates (IR) in Sweden reported an IR of 19 for UC onset in the population aged 60–79 years compared with an IR of 20 in the whole population [4]. In Canada, for the year 2030, a predicted prevalence of 0.69% (95% predictive interval [PI] 0.660–0.721) is estimated for the older UC population, including new diagnoses and already prevalent cases, with a forecasted average annual percentage change of 3% [5].
These epidemiological observations and estimates make it clear that UC onset over 60 years of age and older patients with UC represent, and will represent, a concrete challenge for health care planning today and in the near future. The purpose of the present review is to provide data on differences between UC with onset in adulthood and in older patients in terms of disease location and behaviour, together with data on response and persistence to UC-specific therapies. Finally, we address the most common therapy-related adverse events such as infections, potentially life-threatening and debilitating in this age group, together with malignancies and mortality.
2 Presentation and Disease Course
2.1 Presentation of Disease at Diagnosis
Several attempts have been made in the past few years to define clinical presentation of late-onset UC and to determine if this variant may be different from adult forms.
Compared with adult-onset UC, more frequent weight loss but less frequent rectal bleeding and systemic symptoms like fever have been reported in older populations with UC onset [6,7,8,9,10]. In particular, UC onset in older patients requires a careful diagnostic work-up to differentiate between drug-induced colitis (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), segmental colitis associated with diverticular disease, ischemic or infectious colitis or even neoplastic disease [11], and this may lead to the significant diagnostic delay reported in late-onset disease [12, 13]. Concerning disease extension at diagnosis (Table 1), in a meta-analysis from 2016, left-sided colitis prevails in older-onset disease [14]. This finding was confirmed by subsequent studies [4, 15,16,17], whereas in other studies, extensive colitis [18] or proctitis [19, 20] were more frequent in late-onset UC. Some studies found significant differences for disease extension at diagnosis between adult- versus late-onset UC [3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 21, 22], whereas others did not find such differences [15, 18,19,20]. Taken together, Fig. 1 depicts the most important studies in the past decade concerning disease extension at diagnosis including, where available, the corresponding figure of adult-onset UC.
2.2 Disease Course of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in Older and Adult-Onset Disease
The following variables are generally used to define a worse disease course and poor outcome: proximal disease extension over time, need for more intense medical treatments, hospitalizations, surgery, and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM).
Concerning proximal extension (i.e. a more widespread involvement of the colon surface over time), no differences compared with adult-onset disease were reported in late-onset UC, with figures for both age groups from 6.6 to 12.3% at 5 years after diagnosis and 9.4% to 20.8% at 10 years, respectively [3, 12, 17, 21], and stable disease in terms of extension was observed in 84% of patients [9] (Table 1).
Severity of disease at onset seems to be similar between adult- and late-onset UC [20, 22] with similar steroid needs at onset [3, 14,15,16]; in a former report, a more protracted first episode was found together with a shorter duration of remission compared with young adult-onset disease [23].
Hospitalizations were reported to be more frequent in late-onset UC, not only due to intestinal disease [3, 4] but also to comorbidities [17]. Apart from the disease itself, IBD patients with an older age at onset present a higher risk for frailty which is associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality compared with non-IBD patients [24].
Similar hospitalization rates were reported in a large retrospective US study during the first year of disease in late-onset UC compared with young adults; however, in follow-up, hospitalization rates declined in late-onset disease [25]. Conversely, more frequent infection-related hospitalizations were reported in the first year after diagnosis, especially due to Clostridioides difficile and cytomegalovirus, in a study from Hong Kong, China [26]. For older patients with UC diagnosed earlier in life, a worse outcome with higher hospitalization and mortality rates were reported, mostly due to comorbidities but not to surgery [27]. Higher mortality rates in hospitalized older UC patients including deaths due to surgery were confirmed by a Canadian nationwide study, and mortality as well as readmissions were associated with more comorbidities and being treated in low-volume centers, thus underlining the importance of specialized centers for the cure of fragile patients [28]. In other Canadian studies, the cumulative 5-year risk for colectomy was higher in late-onset compared with adult-onset UC (13.6% vs 10.3%) and this higher risk persisted for up to 10 years [29, 30]. Similar data come from a Spanish referral center cohort where the colectomy rate for older-onset UC compared with adult-onset disease was similar at 1 year from diagnosis, but significantly higher at 5 years (11% vs 5%, respectively) [17]. This finding was confirmed in a very recent Japanese study, although with much lower numbers (3.2% vs 1.1%) at 1 year after diagnosis [31]. In a meta-analysis [14], a higher risk for colectomy was reported in late-onset UC on pooled data but subsequent reports showed no difference [3, 4, 15, 16, 19]. Of interest, elective colectomy was associated with better survival rates than medical therapy in patients over 50 years of age [32].
Concerning EIM that may precede or follow diagnosis of UC, with the exception of primary sclerosing cholangitis reported in (young) adult-onset UC, patients with UC in general are less likely to present with EIM compared with Crohn’s disease patients, with more frequently occurring EIM in pancolitis rather than with proctitis [33]; overall, numerically less frequent EIM were reported in late-onset compared with adult-onset UC, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance in all studies [9, 15, 17].
Taken together, in terms of disease presentation and proximal disease extension, UC onset in older patients seems not to be very different from adult-onset disease. Colectomy rates are higher in late-onset disease, whereas hospitalizations, more frequently due to infections and comorbidities, are burdened by a worse outcome. EIM are less likely to occur in patients with UC onset at an older age.
3 Medical Therapy—Effectiveness and Persistence
Every type of drug, from mesalazine through steroids, immunomodulators, and biotechnological therapies, used in adult UC are also indicated in older patients with UC; limitations and contraindications depend on coexisting comorbidities. There is a lack of specific studies addressing efficacy of mesalazine, steroids, especially low bioavailability steroids, or immunomodulators in the older UC population. As shown by Kochar et al. in a recent systematic review [34], <1% of patients included in randomized clinical trials were ≥65 years. The evidence reported in literature in real-life studies concerning effectiveness of available therapies and persistence in therapy is therefore summarized in Table 2, divided into late-onset and older patients with long-standing disease (in the assumption that late-onset UC may represent a distinct entity).
3.1 Mesalazine (5-ASA)
5-ASA is the most common drug employed in late- as well as in adult-onset UC, reaching >90% of all patients in the first year after diagnosis. Thereafter, this percentage declined by approximately 20% in a study from Italy [15]; a similar pattern but with lower numbers was reported from Sweden [4], whereas in Northern France treatment with 5-ASA showed an inverse pattern starting with 65% and reaching 84% 10 years after diagnosis [9]. In other reports, percentages of 5-ASA use were comparable in late-onset versus adult-onset UC, ranging from 75% versus 71% [20] to 84% versus 74%, respectively [35].
3.2 Corticosteroids
In both young adult and older patients, conventional systemic steroids were employed in 20–50% of UC patients at diagnosis or in the following years depending on disease severity [3, 4, 8, 15, 17], and the use of steroids, with few exceptions, did not differ between the age groups.
Conflicting results were reported on response to steroids, ranging from a better outcome in late-onset UC compared with young adults in achieving steroid-free remission at 1 year after diagnosis [21] to similar response to steroids including low-bioavailability steroids [15], or even lesser response to intravenous (IV) steroids [36] or IV/oral steroids in longstanding UC [37].
Other studies found a more frequent and more prolonged use of steroids in patients with late-onset UC, with chronic steroid treatment in 31% of patients [34]; this figure rose to 40% in a study on older IBD patients [38].
A lower rate of steroid-dependency in late-onset UC compared with younger adults was reported in a Spanish referral center study [17], whereas similar rates of steroid dependency and refractoriness were found in a French population-based study [8].
3.3 Immunomodulators
With the exception of two recent Asiatic studies [31, 39], almost all previous epidemiological studies investigating the use of immunomodulators (mainly thiopurines) in late-onset UC in comparison with younger age groups reported a minor use of these therapies in older patients [3, 4, 8, 15, 19, 22], and this observation was interpreted as these patients having a more benign disease course. While in younger adults diagnosed with UC, immunomodulators were commenced in 5–27% to 18–53%, 1 and 5 years after diagnosis, respectively, only 2.5–15% to 10–36% of patients with late-onset UC were reported to start such therapy [3, 4, 8, 17]. A switch to a second thiopurine in the case of intolerance or adverse event with the first one (in general, azathioprine) was also deemed safe in older patients [40].
Recent investigations, however, showed that the age of patients was the main hindrance for the prescription of these medications [41], whereas a retrospective study identified comorbidities as the main factor for not prescribing immunomodulators [42]. When administered, thiopurines showed a similar efficacy in late- compared with young adult-onset UC [15] and a more prolonged treatment with thiopurines (>12 months) was associated with a lower risk for colectomy [43]. However, in older IBD patients, thiopurines showed a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events compared with younger patients [44].
3.4 Biotechnological Therapies
3.4.1 Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (Anti-TNF) Therapies
In late-onset UC studies, whether referral center- or population-based, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies were administered in the first 3–5 years to a minority (5–12%) of older patients with UC compared with 14–16% of patients with adult-onset disease [4, 15, 17], whereas a similar use of anti-TNF was reported in older UC patients with longstanding disease [45, 46].
Lower steroid-free remission rates at 8 weeks compared with young adults were recently reported in late-onset UC [47], whereas the same authors reported a similar response to younger adults in older patients with longstanding disease. An analysis from randomized trials showed no difference in response and remission rates in older UC patients [48]. Previous reports indicated a lower response to anti-TNF therapy in older longstanding IBD populations [49, 50] but in the longer term, a similar effectiveness of anti-TNF was reported in a mixed IBD population in older patients [51].Finally, higher discontinuation rates of anti-TNFs were reported in older patients with UC in comparison with younger adult patients due to loss of response or to adverse events [52, 53].
3.4.2 Vedolizumab
Comparable clinical response and remission rates including steroid-free and endoscopic remission were reported with the use of vedolizumab, an α4β7 anti-integrin antibody, in older versus adult patients with UC, with about 50% of patients already exposed to anti-TNFs [54, 55] with similar persistence in therapy [54, 56] and mucosal healing rates [57].
In biologically naïve older UC patients, steroid-free remission at 52 weeks was reported in 40–60% together with good persistence in therapy over time (75% at 52 weeks) [58, 59]. A retrospective multicenter comparison between anti-TNF and vedolizumab in older UC patients did not find any difference at 6 and 12 months [60]. In contrast, a single-center retrospective study showed an advantage for vedolizumab compared with anti-TNF agents with respect to drug persistence and endoscopic remission in a mixed IBD cohort over 60 years of age [61].
3.4.3 Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab, an antibody targeting the common p40 subunit of interleukin-12/23, has been introduced very recently to the range of therapeutic options for UC [62]. To date, no data on older patients with UC or patients with late-onset UC are available but its safety profile seems promising.
3.5 Small Molecules
3.5.1 Tofacitinib
Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor recently approved for UC. Similar to ustekinumab, no specific data on efficacy in older UC patients were available. In a global analysis, no difference for safety was reported in 77 patients ≥65 years of age [63].
In summary, 5-ASA, although not supported by specific studies, remains the mainstay in mild to moderate UC in older patients but, if necessary, the use of immunomodulators in fit patients may be indicated on a case-by-case basis. Among the biological therapies, the more recent drugs, vedolizumab and ustekinumab (the latter lacks UC-related data in older patients), may represent the drugs of choice in late-onset and in older patients with longstanding, more aggressive UC. Evidence for tofacitinib, although promising, is still awaiting data on safety (see section 4).
4 Therapy-Related Risks in Older Patients with UC
Potential risks due to therapy, possible preventive actions, and known drug–drug interactions are summarized in Table 3. Polypharmacy is frequently reported in older IBD patients [34, 64] and for potential interactions please refer to ref. [65,66,67,68].
In this section, we will focus on risks associated with the disease itself in older UC patients and induced or enhanced by therapies approved for the treatment of UC. With the exception of well-known specific risks of drug categories, such as osteoporosis, fractures, hypertension, and diabetes due to steroids [69, 70] or bone marrow and liver toxicity due to immunomodulators [71, 72], we will consider infections, in part potentiated by combination therapies, the risk of malignancies, thromboembolism, and mortality. Frequently, these studies have been carried out on older mixed IBD populations but, whenever possible, peculiar aspects in UC patients will be addressed.
4.1 Infections
Except for mesalazine (5-ASA), all conventional treatment options for UC carry a risk for infections and, generally speaking, this risk increases in older patients. These may be opportunistic infections from viruses, fungi or bacteria or may be due to well-known pathogens such as pneumococcus and Herpes zoster (H. zoster). Besides the therapy-induced risk for infections, there are infections that are increased in IBD patients regardless of current therapies, such as pneumococcal disease and infections from H. zoster and C. diff., and this risk increases further when patients are exposed to immunosuppressive agents. Cofactors that potentiate immunosuppression do exist and are represented by malnutrition, advanced age, frailty and comorbidities (especially diabetes), chronic lung disease and alcoholism [42, 73]. Finally, the risks due to the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in immunosuppressed and older patients will be examined.
4.1.1 Respiratory Tract Infections and Pneumonia
In a large retrospective cohort (<64 years of age) of mixed IBD patients (database: LifeLink™ Health Plan Claims Database; IMS Health Inc, Norwalk, CT, USA), 4856 patients were diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia and compared with non-IBD controls (ratio 1:4). For these IBD patients, an annual incidence for pneumonia was calculated with 138 cases/10,000, compared with 76/10,000 in the non-IBD cohort. Among the most important risk factors, the authors identified the use of steroids and narcotics with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.91 (95% CI 1.72–2.12) and 2.28 (95% CI 2.09–2.48), respectively [74]. In a nationwide Danish study, the risk for invasive pneumococcal disease was investigated in 75,156 IBD patients [75] and was found to be twofold higher among patients with UC within 1 year after diagnosis. In this study, the use of thiopurines was also associated with a higher risk for invasive pneumococcal disease in UC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38; 95% CI 1.00–5.67). Interestingly, the risk for pneumococcal disease was also found to be increased in the 12 months before the diagnosis of IBD was established, pointing to an IBD-specific risk for pneumococcal disease. In a cohort with late (≥66 years) disease onset, respiratory tract infections represented 37.8% of all infections with an adjusted relative risk of 4.0 (95% CI 2.5–6.6) for all serious bacterial infections in concurrent steroid users [76]. Of interest, the risk remained elevated for 3 months after the last prescription of steroids.
An increased risk for infections (mainly pulmonary) and mortality was reported in older IBD patients treated with anti-TNF compared with older patients without biologic treatment [77]. Toruner et al. [78]showed that the odds ratios for opportunistic infection including pneumonia rose with every single immunosuppressive agent (steroids, thiopurines, anti-TNFs) by a risk factor of 3, whereas the combination of these agents was associated with a risk factor of 14.5, with higher relative risks in patients aged >50 years.
4.1.2 Clostridioides difficile
Infections due to C. diff. have been steadily increasing over the past decades, especially in IBD patients [79,80,81]. Known risk factors for C. diff. infection in the general population are the use of antibiotics, living in communities, and the use of proton pump inhibitors [82, 83]. In IBD, no age-specific risk has yet been identified with the exception of comorbidities [84]. IBD patients have a threefold to fivefold risk for C. diff. infections compared with non-IBD patients with higher hospitalization rates, longer in-hospital stays, and greater mortality. Moreover, especially in UC patients, an increased long-term risk for colectomy was reported [85]. The impact of therapy on the development of C. diff. infections in IBD remains controversial. There is a consistent body of evidence that immunosuppressive treatment including steroids, immunomodulators and anti-TNF agents is associated with C. diff infection [80, 81, 84, 86], but in the most recent systematic review with meta-analysis no association between steroids or immunomodulators and C. diff infections was identified [87].
4.1.3 Herpes zoster
A higher risk of H. zoster compared with non-IBD subjects was reported in a retrospective analysis in the prebiologic era (1988–1997) in a cohort of approximately 20,000 IBD patients with an increased incidence rate ratio in UC (1.21; 95% CI 1.05–1.40) [88]. Steroids (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1–2.2) and thiopurines (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.7–5.6) were both associated with H. zoster. In the aforementioned LifeLink™ database [74], an increased H. zoster risk was reported for IBD patients compared with non-IBD controls and in patients aged >60 years. Assessing risk factors, all types of medications except 5-ASA (thiopurines: OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.30–2.16; steroids: OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.60–2.40; and anti-TNFs: OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.47–3.79) were independently associated with an increased risk for H. zoster in UC patients [89]. The highest risk was reported for combination therapies (OR 4.79, 95% CI 1.84–12.45). An association with H. zoster has similarly been reported for methotrexate [90]. A more recent US study investigating the association between different pharmacologic strategies for IBD in terms of an increased H. zoster risk showed an association between short-term and cumulative steroid use, use of thiopurines, and of combination therapies but not for anti-TNF monotherapy [91]. The highest risk showed in patients aged >60 years on combination therapies with an annual incidence of 2%. As an additional risk factor, disease flare was identified.
The recently approved JAK inhibitor tofacitinib was reported to carry a high risk for H. zoster, especially in older patients, underlining the importance of vaccinations against H. zoster in these high-risk patients [63, 92].
4.1.4 SARS-CoV-2
In several studies, older age and a higher Charlson-Comorbidity index were associated with an increased risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, and these risk factors, together with active intestinal disease, were found to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2-related death [93, 94]; immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection [95] and it appears that UC patients had a lower risk for severe viral disease, possibly due to the lower rate of smokers among UC patients [96].
Taken together, besides drug-specific adverse events, infection risk remains a major problem when treating older UC patients, especially with corticosteroids. Thus, vaccination programs with recombinant vaccines, where available, for preventable diseases (e.g. pneumococcal pneumonia, H. zoster, influenza, etc.) are mandatory to reduce such risk, even in patients already under immunosuppressive treatment.
4.2 Thromboembolism
Patients with IBD are at increased risk for arterial [97] and venous thromboembolic events with an important impact on in-hospital mortality in older patients [98]. The risk persists even after discharge, especially in surgical UC patients [99]. International guidelines recommend prophylaxis in hospitalized and especially in surgical patients [100].
Only one medication approved for UC (tofacitinib) appears to increase the risk for venous thromboembolic events, with an induction regimen of 10 mg twice daily [101] with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [102] and European Medicines Agency (EMA) warnings [103], especially in patients aged >65 years.
4.3 Malignancies
It is well known that older IBD patients are at increased risk for malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC), especially in patients with longstanding disease, or leukemia in UC patients [87, 104]. This section focuses mainly on therapy-related malignancy risk modulation observed in the older IBD population.
Firstly, thiopurines have been recognized as carrying an increased risk of malignancies, especially for lymphoproliferative disorders [105], non-melanoma skin cancer [106], urinary tract disease [107], and for new cancers or cancer recurrence [108]. Of interest, the risk for skin cancer persists even after drug withdrawal, making lifetime dermatologic controls mandatory. On the other hand, the use of thiopurines has been associated with a reduced risk for CRC [109].
Biotechnological therapies have been discussed over the last decade with respect to cancer risk, but no conclusive data are available yet, especially for lymphoproliferative disorders [110, 111] and melanoma [112, 113]. No increased risk of new or recurrent cancers with anti-TNF or vedolizumab in patients with prior malignancy has been reported [114]. Other therapies such as ustekinumab [115] or tofacitinib [116] appear to be safe but an in-depth evaluation by the EMA including all JAK inhibitors is underway.
4.4 Mortality
Independently from age, mortality in UC after the first year from diagnosis appears to be similar to that of the general population [117], but frailty [24], steroid use [118], infections [119], and surgery-related complications [27] remain the major drivers for adverse outcomes.
5 Conclusions
UC onset at an older age is becoming more and more frequent, exceeding the incidence of adult-onset disease in some studies and, together with patients with longstanding disease, those >65 years of age represent a consistent proportion of the UC population.
In late-onset disease, disease presentation and initial course seem comparable to those of adulthood, an observation confirmed by the need for steroids and surgery, but some indicators point to a more benign disease course, such as the need for immunosuppression and biologics, the rate of proximal extension, as well as the less frequent occurrence of EIM in late-onset UC. These apparently favourable factors are outweighed by age- and therapy-related risks for adverse events including infections, thromboembolic events, and malignancies in older UC patients either with long-standing disease or with recent onset. Vaccination-preventable infections such as pneumonia or H. zoster must be addressed both in adult and, especially, in older patients as outcomes may be worse in the latter. More data on newer biological drugs (i.e. ustekinumab and vedolizumab) and the recently introduced JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, are warranted in older patients, including those with new-onset disease as well as patients with longstanding disease.
References
Keyashian K, Dehghan M, Sceats L, Kin C, Limketkai BN, Park KT. Comparative incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in different age groups in the United States. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25:1983–9.
Nørgård BM, Nielsen J, Fonager K, Kjeldsen J, Jacobsen BA, Qvist N. The incidence of ulcerative colitis (1995–2011) and Crohn’s disease (1995–2012) - based on nationwide Danish registry data. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1274–80.
Jeuring SF, van den Heuvel TR, Zeegers MP, Hameeteman WH, Romberg-Camps MJ, Oostenbrug LE, et al. Epidemiology and long-term outcome of inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed at elderly age-an increasing distinct entity? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1425–34.
Everhov ÅH, Halfvarson J, Myrelid P, Sachs MC, Nordenvall C, Söderling J, et al. Incidence and treatment of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel diseases at 60 years or older in Sweden. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:518–28.
Coward S, Clement F, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Avina-Zubieta JA, Bitton A, et al. Past and future burden of inflammatory bowel diseases based on modeling of population-based data. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1345–53.
Riegler G, Tartaglione MT, Carratú R, D’Incá R, Valpiani D, Russo MI, et al. Age-related clinical severity at diagnosis in 1705 patients with ulcerative colitis: a study by GISC (Italian Colon-Rectum Study Group). Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:462–5.
Greth J, Török HP, Koenig A, Folwaczny C. Comparison of inflammatory bowel disease at younger and older age. Eur J Med Res. 2004;9:552–4.
Gower-Rousseau C, Vasseur F, Fumery M, Savoye G, Salleron J, Dauchet L, et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases: new insights from a French population-based registry (EPIMAD). Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:89–94.
Charpentier C, Salleron J, Savoye G, Fumery M, Merle V, Laberenne JE, et al. Natural history of elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Gut. 2014;63:423–32.
Hadithi M, Cazemier M, Meijer GA, Bloemena E, Felt-Bersma RJ, Mulder CJ, et al. Retrospective analysis of old-age colitis in the Dutch inflammatory bowel disease population. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3183–7.
Leoncini G, Reggiani-Bonetti L, Simoncelli G, Villanacci V. Histology of ibd and related colitides in the elderly. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino). 2021. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.21.02888-6.
Zammarchi I, Lanzarotto F, Cannatelli R, Munari F, Benini F, Pozzi A, et al. Elderly-onset vs adult-onset ulcerative colitis: a different natural history? BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:14t. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01296-x.
Burgmann T, Clara I, Graff L, Walker J, Lix L, Rawsthorne P, et al. The Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study: prolonged symptoms before diagnosis–how much is irritable bowel syndrome? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:614–20.
Ananthakrishnan AN, Shi HY, Tang W, Law CC, Sung JJ, Chan FK, Ng SC. Systematic review and meta-analysis: phenotype and clinical outcomes of older-onset inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1224–36.
Fries W, Viola A, Manetti N, Frankovic I, Pugliese D, Monterubbianesi R, et al. Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD). Disease patterns in late-onset ulcerative colitis: Results from the IG-IBD “AGED study.” Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:17–23.
Kumar V, Shah Y, Patel D, Khan N. Elderly-onset and adult-onset ulcerative colitis are more similar than previously reported in a nationwide cohort. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:2857–62.
Mañosa M, Calafat M, de Francisco R, García C, Casanova MJ, Huelín P, et al. GETECCU. Phenotype and natural history of elderly onset inflammatory bowel disease: a multicentre, case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:605–14.
Hou JK, Feagins LA, Waljee AK. Characteristics and behavior of elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a multi-center US study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:2200–5.
Mak JWY, Ho CLT, Wong K, Cheng TY, Yip TCF, Leung WK, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: results from a territory-wide Hong Kong IBD registry. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;15:401–8.
Park SH, Jeong SK, Lee JH, Rhee KH, Kim YH, Hong SN, et al. Songpa-Kangdong Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SK-IBD) Study Group. Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of elderly-onset ulcerative colitis in a population-based cohort in the Songpa-Kangdong district of Seoul, Korea. Gut Liver. 2021;15:742–51.
Ha CY, Newberry RD, Stone CD, Ciorba MA. Patients with late-adult-onset ulcerative colitis have better outcomes than those with early onset disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:682–7.
Lakatos PL, David G, Pandur T, Erdelyi Z, Mester G, Balogh M, et al. IBD in the elderly population: results from a population-based study in Western Hungary, 1977–2008. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5:5–13.
Softley A, Myren J, Clamp SE, Bouchier IA, Watkinson G, de Dombal FT. Inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly patient. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988;23(Suppl. 144):27–30.
Kochar B, Jylhävä J, Söderling J, Ritchie CS, Ludvigsson JF, Khalili H, Olén O. SWIBREG Study Group. Prevalence and implications of frailty in older adults with incident inflammatory bowel diseases: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;S1542–3565(22):00007–16.
Nguyen GC, Sheng L, Benchimol EI. Health care utilization in elderly onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:777–82.
Ko MK, Ng SC, Mak LY, Li MK, Lo FH, Ng CK, et al. Infection-related hospitalizations in the first year after inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. Dig Dis. 2016;17:610–7.
Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG. Inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly is associated with worse outcomes: a national study of hospitalizations. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:182–9.
Nguyen GC, Bollegala N, Chong CA. Factors associated with readmissions and outcomes of patients hospitalized for inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1897–904.
Nguyen GC, Bernstein CN, Benchimol EI. Risk of surgery and mortality in elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:218–23.
Targownik LE, Singh H, Nugent Z, Bernstein CN. The epidemiology of colectomy in ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1228–35.
Shimodaira Y, Watanabe K, Iijima K. Clinical course of ulcerative colitis associated with an age at diagnosis: a recent Japanese Database Survey. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021;255:33–9.
Bewtra M, Newcomb CW, Wu Q, Chen L, Xie F, Roy JA, et al. Mortality associated with medical therapy versus elective colectomy in ulcerative colitis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:262–70.
Isene R, Bernklev T, Høie O, Munkholm P, Tsianos E, Stockbrügger R, et al. EC-IBD Study Group. Extraintestinal manifestations in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: results from a prospective, population-based European inception cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:300–5.
Kochar B, Kalasapudi L, Ufere NN, Nipp RD, Ananthakrishnan AN, Ritchie CS. Systematic review of inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials of medications used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27:1541–3.
Parian A, Ha CY. Older age and steroid use are associated with increasing polypharmacy and potential medication interactions among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:1392–400.
Okabayashi S, Yamazaki H, Tominaga K, Miura M, Sagami S, Matsuoka K, et al. IBD Terakoya Group. Lower effectiveness of intravenous steroid treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in hospitalised patients with older onset: a multicentre cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16865.
Zhang M, Lv H, Yang H, Zhang H, Bai X, Qian J. Elderly patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis are more likely to have treatment failure and adverse outcome. Gerontology. 2022;6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000522569.
Juneja M, Baidoo L, Schwartz MB, Barrie A, Regueiro M, Dunn M, Binion DG. Geriatric inflammatory bowel disease: phenotypic presentation, treatment patterns, nutritional status, outcomes, and comorbidity. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2408–15.
Song EM, Lee HS, Park SH, Kim GU, Seo M, Hwang SW, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of elderly onset ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:172–9.
Calafat M, Mañosa M, Mesonero F, Guardiola J, Mínguez M, Nos P, et al. ENEIDA registry of GETECCU. Switching to a second thiopurine in adult and elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the ENEIDA Registry. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:1290–8.
Chan W, Kariyawasam VC, Kim S, Pudipeddi AV, Paramsothy S, Shim HH, et al. Gastroenterologists’ preference and risk perception on the use of immunomodulators and biological therapies in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis: as international survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32:976–83.
Kariyawasam VC, Kim S, Mourad FH, Selinger CP, Katelaris PH, Brian Jones D, et al. Comorbidities rather than age are associated with the use of immunomodulators in elderly-onset infammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25:1390–8.
Alexakis C, Saxena S, Chhaya V, Cecil E, Curcin V, Pollok R. Do thiopurines reduce the risk of surgery in elderly onset inflammatory bowel disease? A 20-year national population-based cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:672–80.
Calafat M, Mañosa M, Cañete F, Ricart E, Iglesias E, Calvo M, et al. ENEIDA registry of GETECCU. Increased risk of thiopurine-related adverse events in elderly patients with IBD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:780–8.
Geisz M, Ha C, Kappelman MD, Martin CF, Chen W, Anton K, Sandler RS, Long MD. Medication utilization and the impact of continued corticosteroid use on patient-reported outcomes in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1435–41.
Moroi R, Shiga H, Tarasawa K, Yano K, Shimoyama Y, Kuroha M, Kakuta Y, Fushimi K, Fujimori K, Kinouchi Y, Masamune A. The clinical practice of ulcerative colitis in elderly patients: an investigation using a nationwide database in Japan. JGH Open. 2021;5:842–8.
Amano T, Shinzaki S, Asakura A, Tashiro T, Tani M, Otake Y, et al. Elderly onset age is associated with low efficacy of first anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5324.
Cheng D, Cushing KC, Cai T, Ananthakrishnan AN. Safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in older patients with ulcerative colitis: patient-level pooled analysis of data from randomized trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;19:939–46.
Lobatón T, Ferrante M, Rutgeerts P, Ballet V, Van Assche G, Vermeire S. Efficacy and safety of anti-TNF therapy in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:441–51.
Desai A, Zator ZA, de Silva P, Nguyen DD, Korzenik J, Yajnik V, et al. Older age is associated with higher rate of discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:309–15.
Calafat M, Mañosa M, Ricart E, Nos P, Iglesias-Flores E, Vera I, et al. ENEIDA Study Group of GETECCU. Risk of immunomediated adverse events and loss of response to infliximab in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study of the ENEIDA registry. J Crohns Colitis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab213.
de Jong ME, Smits LJT, van Ruijven B, den Broeder N, Russel MGVM, Römkens TEH, et al. Increased discontinuation rates of anti-TNF therapy in elderly inflammatory bowel disease patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:888–95.
Porcari S, Viola A, Orlando A, Privitera AC, Ferracane C, Cappello M, et al. Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (SN-IBD). Persistence on anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease compared with younger patients: data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (SN-IBD). Drugs Aging. 2020;37:383–92.
Khan N, Pernes T, Weiss A, Trivedi C, Patel M, Medvedeva E, et al. Efficacy of Vedolizumab in a nationwide cohort of elderly inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izab163.
Cohen NA, Plevris N, Kopylov U, Grinman A, Ungar B, Yanai H, et al. Vedolizumab is effective and safe in elderly inflammatory bowel disease patients: a binational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:1076–85.
Weiss A, Trivedi C, Tyler Pernes T, Patel M, Khan NH. Efficacy of vedolizumab in a nationwide cohort of elderly inflammatory bowel disease patient. Gastroenteroloy. 2021;160(suppl):S346.
Shashi P, Gopalakrishnan D, Parikh MP, Shen B, Kochhar G. Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a matched case-control study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019;8:306–11.
Attauabi M, Höglund C, Fassov J, Pedersen KB, Hansen HB, Wildt S, et al. Vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy in elderly patients and those with contraindications for anti-TNF therapy: a real-world, nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021;56:1040–8.
Macaluso FS, Fries W, Renna S, Viola A, Muscianisi M, Cappello M, et al. Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in biologically naive patients: a real-world multi-centre study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:1045–55.
Adar T, Faleck D, Sasidharan S, Cushing K, Borren NZ, Nalagatla N, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α antagonists and vedolizumab in elderly IBD patients: a multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49:873–9.
Pabla BS, Alex Wiles C, Slaughter JC, Scoville EA, Dalal RL, Beaulieu DB, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Vedolizumab Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha Antagonists in an Elderly IBD Population: A Single Institution Retrospective Experience. Dig Dis Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07129-5.
Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, O’Brien CD, Zhang H, Johanns J, et al. UNIFI Study Group. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1201–14.
Sandborn WJ, Panés J, D’Haens GR, Sands BE, Su C, Moscariello M, et al. Safety of tofacitinib for treatment of ulcerative colitis, based on 4.4 years of data from global clinical trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1541–50.
Katz S, Feldstein R. Inflammatory bowel disease of the elderly: a wake-up call. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2008;4:337–47.
Ingrasciotta Y, Grova M, Crispino F, Isgró V, Calapai F, Macaluso FS, et al. Safety and potential interaction of immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in elderly patients. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino). 2021. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.21.02919-3.
Walton A, Paik J, Quebe A, Kannowski CL, Choong C, Anderson S, et al. Frequency of prescription claims for drugs that may interact with Janus kinase inhibitors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the US. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:599–607.
Tse S, Dowty ME, Menon S, Gupta P, Krishnaswami S. Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug exposure and support dosing recommendations for potential drug-drug interactions or in special populations: an example using Tofacitinib. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60:1617–28.
Dewit O, Vanheuverzwyn R, Desager JP, Horsmans Y. Interaction between azathioprine and aminosalicylates: an in vivo study in patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:79–85.
Govani SM, Wiitala WL, Stidham RW, Saini SD, Hou JK, Feagins LA, et al. Age disparities in the use of steroid-sparing therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1923–8.
Thomas TP. The complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy in the elderly. A retrospective study. Gerontology. 1984;30:60–5.
Singh A, Mahajan R, Kedia S, Dutta AK, Anand A, Bernstein CN, et al. Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: an update. Intest Res. 2022;20:11–30.
Costantino G, Furfaro F, Belvedere A, Alibrandi A, Fries W. Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: response predictors, safety, and withdrawal in follow-up. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6:588–96.
Rahier JF, Magro F, Abreu C, Armuzzi A, Ben-Horin S, Chowers Y, et al. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Second European evidence-based consensus on the prevention, diagnosis and management of opportunistic infections in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:443–68.
Long MD, Martin C, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD. Increased risk of pneumonia among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:240–8.
Kantsø B, Simonsen J, Hoffmann S, Valentiner-Branth P, Petersen AM, Jess T. Inflammatory bowel disease patients are at increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease: a nationwide Danish cohort study 1977–2013. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1582–7.
Brassard P, Bitton A, Suissa A, Sinyavskaya L, Patenaude V, Suissa S. Oral corticosteroids and the risk of serious infections in patients with elderly-onset inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1795–802.
Cottone M, Kohn A, Daperno M, Armuzzi A, Guidi L, D’Inca R, et al. Advanced age is an independent risk factor for severe infections and mortality in patients given anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:30–5.
Toruner M, Loftus EV Jr, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Orenstein R, Sandborn WJ, et al. Risk factors for opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:929–36.
Bossuyt P, Verhaegen J, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S. Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2009;3:4–7.
Rodemann JF, Dubberke ER, Reske KA, da Seo H, Stone CD. Incidence of Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;3:339–41.
Issa M, Vijayapal A, Graham MB, Beaulieu DB, Otterson MF, Lundeen S, et al. Impact of Clostridium difficile on inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:345–51.
Moshkowitz M, Ben-Baruch E, Kline Z, Shimoni Z, Niven M, Konikoff F. Risk factors for severity and relapse of pseudomembranous colitis in an elderly population. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:173–7.
Dial S, Delaney JA, Schneider V, Suissa S. Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease defined by pre- scription for oral vancomycin therapy. CMAJ. 2006;175:745–8.
Singh H, Nugent Z, Yu BN, Lix LM, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Higher incidence of Clostridium difficile infection among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:430–8.
Law CC, Tariq R, Khanna S, Murthy S, McCurdy JD. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the impact of Clostridium difficile infection on the short- and long-term risks of colectomy in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:1011–20.
Schneeweiss S, Korzenik J, Solomon DH, Canning C, Lee J, Bressler B. Infliximab and other immunomodulating drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of serious bacterial infections. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:253–64.
Balram B, Battat R, Al-Khoury A, D’Aoust J, Afif W, Bitton A, et al. Risk factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:27–38.
Gupta G, Lautenbach E, Lewis JD. Incidence and risk factors for Herpes zoster among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1483–90.
Long MD, Martin C, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD. Increased risk of Herpes zoster among 108,604 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:420–9.
Herfarth HH, Kappelman MD, Long MD, Isaacs KL. Use of methotrexate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:224–33.
Khan N, Patel D, Trivedi C, Shah Y, Lichtenstein G, Lewis J, et al. Overall and comparative risk of Herpes zoster with pharmacotherapy for inflammatory bowel diseases: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1919–27.
Winthrop KL, Melmed GY, Vermeire S, Long MD, Chan G, Pedersen RD, et al. Herpes zoster infection in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:2258–65.
D’Amico F, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Systematic review on inflammatory bowel disease patients with coronavirus disease 2019: it is time to take stock. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:2689–700.
Macaluso FS, Giuliano A, Fries W, Viola A, Abbruzzese A, Cappello M, et al. Severe activity of inflammatory bowel disease is a risk factor for severe COVID-19. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izac064.
Calafat M, González-Muñoza C, Fortuny M, Roig C, Calm A, Mombiela A, et al. Impact of immunosuppressants on SARS-CoV-2 infection in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33:2355–9.
Peyrin-Biroulet C, D’Amico F, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Will COVID-19 infection be less severe in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s patients, due to a lower rate of smokers? J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:1648.
Bernstein CN, Wajda A, Blanchard JF. The incidence of arterial thromboembolic diseases in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:41–5.
Nguyen GC, Sam J. Rising prevalence of venous thromboembolism and its impact on mortality among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2272–80.
McCurdy JD, Kuenzig ME, Smith G, Spruin S, Murthy SK, Carrier M, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26:1761–8.
Øresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM, Spinelli A, Windsor A, Ferrante M, et al. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:4–25.
Sandborn WJ, Panés J, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Su C, Lawendy N, et al. Venous thromboembolic events in the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical development program. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:1068–76.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/initial-safety-trial-results-find-increased-risk-serious-heart-related-problems-and-cancer-arthritis. Accessed 30 Oct 2021.
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-confirms-xeljanz-be-used-caution-patients-high-risk-blood-clots. Accessed 30 Oct 2021.
Annese V, Beaugerie L, Egan L, Biancone L, Bolling C, Brandts C, et al. ECCO. European evidence-based consensus: inflammatory bowel disease and malignancies. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:945–65.
Kotlyar DS, Lewis JD, Beaugerie L, Tierney A, Brensinger CM, Gisbert JP, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:847–58.
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Khosrotehrani K, Carrat F, Bouvier AM, Chevaux JB, Simon T, Carbonnel F, Colombel JF, Dupas JL, Godeberge P, Hugot JP, Lémann M, Nahon S, et al. Cesame Study Group. Increased risk for nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients who receive thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1621-28.e1-5.
Bourrier A, Carrat F, Colombel JF, Bouvier AM, Abitbol V, Marteau P, et al. CESAME study group. Excess risk of urinary tract cancers in patients receiving thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:252–61.
Beaugerie L, Carrat F, Colombel JF, Bouvier AM, Sokol H, Babouri A, et al. CESAME Study Group. Risk of new or recurrent cancer under immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IBD and previous cancer. Gut. 2014;63:1416–23.
Gordillo J, Cabré E, Garcia-Planella E, Ricart E, Ber-Nieto Y, Márquez L, Rodríguez-Moranta F, et al. ENEIDA Project of the Spanish Working Group in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU). Thiopurine therapy reduces the incidence of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis. Data from the ENEIDA Registry. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:1063–70.
Muller M, D’Amico F, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. TNF inhibitors and risk of malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review. J Crohns Colitis. 2021;15:840–59.
Dahmus J, Rosario M, Clarke K. Risk of lymphoma associated with anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: implications for therapy. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020;13:339–50.
Esse S, Mason KJ, Green AC, Warren RB. Melanoma risk in patients treated with biologic therapy for common inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:787–94.
Wang JH, D’Arcy M, Barnes EL, Freedman ND, Engels EA, Song M. Associations of inflammatory bowel disease and subsequent cancers in a population-based study of older adults in the United States. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022;6:pkab096.
Vedamurthy A, Gangasani N, Ananthakrishnan AN. Vedolizumab or tumor necrosis factor antagonist use and risk of new or recurrent cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with prior malignancy: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;S1542–3565(20):31396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.007.
Sandborn WJ, Rebuck R, Wang Y, Zou B, Adedokun OJ, Gasink C, et al. Five-year efficacy and safety of ustekinumab treatment in Crohn’s disease: the IM-UNITI trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.025.
Olivera PA, Lasa JS, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases or other immune-mediated diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1554–73.
Bernstein CN, Nugent Z, Targownik LE, Singh H, Lix LM. Predictors and risks for death in a population-based study of persons with IBD in Manitoba. Gut. 2015;64(9):1403–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307983.
Kuenzig ME, Manuel DG, Donelle J, Benchimol EI. Real world evidence of the association between medication and life expectancy in elderly inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:5.
Schwartz J, Stein DJ, Lipcsey M, Li B, Feuerstein JD. High rates of mortality in geriatric patients admitted for inflammatory bowel disease management. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56:e20–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics declarations
Not applicable.
Funding
This work did not receive any fundings.
Conflicts of interest
W.F., M.G.D, G.N., G. B., and A.V. have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have read the paper and agree with its content.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author contributions
W.F. and A.V. design of the review and drafting of the paper; G.N. and M.G.D. critical review of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fries, W., Demarzo, M.G., Navarra, G. et al. Ulcerative Colitis in Adulthood and in Older Patients: Same Disease, Same Outcome, Same Risks?. Drugs Aging 39, 441–452 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-022-00943-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-022-00943-0