Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary neurological diseases in Mali

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As genetic advances become incorporated into health care delivery, disparities between developing and developed countries may become greater. By addressing genetic health care needs and specific differences of developing countries, these disparities may be mitigated. We sought to describe the attitudes and knowledge of subjects with hereditary neurological diseases in Mali before and after receiving genetic testing and counseling for the first time. A questionnaire of attitudes and knowledge items was adapted and piloted for use in Mali. We found that the majority of subjects had positive attitudes toward genetic testing and counseling, both before and afterwards. Subjects responded to approximately half of the knowledge questions regarding hereditary transmission correctly before and after genetic testing and counseling. Neither overall attitudes nor knowledge scores changed significantly from baseline. Concerns about confidentiality were expressed by the majority of subjects. These findings indicate that, despite limited knowledge of patterns of inheritance, Malians understood the sensitive nature of this information and were favorable toward receiving genetic testing and counseling for diagnostic and prognostic purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S, Green JM, Hewison J (2006) Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for thalassaemia in pregnant Pakistani women in the north of England. Prenat Diagn 26(3):248–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong K, Calzone K, Stopfer J, Fitzgerald G, Coyne J, Weber B (2000) Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(11):1251–1254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basson F, Futter MJ, Greenberg J (2007) Qualitative research methodology in the exploration of patients’ perceptions of participating in a genetic research program. Ophthalmic Genet 28(3):143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt BA, Chase GA, Faden RR, Geller G, Hofman KJ, Tambor ES et al (1996) Educating patients about cystic fibrosis carrier screening in a primary care setting. Arch Fam Med 5(6):336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berth H, Balck F, Dinkel A (2002) Attitudes toward genetic testing in patients at risk for HNPCC/FAP and the German population. Genet Test 6(4):273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodamer OA, Hoffmann GF, Lindner M (2007) Expanded newborn screening in Europe 2007. J Inherit Metab Dis 30(4):439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiro-Lewandowski E (2002) Newborn screening: an overview. Clin Lab Sci 15(4):229–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers C, Weskamp K, Bryer A (1997) The sword of Damocles: the psychosocial impact of familial spinocerebellar ataxia in South Africa. Am J Med Genet 74(3):270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebomoyi E (1988) Knowledge and attitude towards genetic screening for sickle cell disease. Hygie 7(1):33–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etchegary H, Cappelli M, Potter B, Vloet M, Graham I, Walker M et al (2010) Attitude and knowledge about genetics and genetic testing. Public Health Genomics 13(2):80–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Futter MJ, Heckmann JM, Greenberg LJ (2009) Predictive testing for Huntington disease in a developing country. Clin Genet 75(1):92–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green MJ, Peterson SK, Baker MW, Harper GR, Friedman LC, Rubinstein WS et al (2004) Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 292(4):442–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C, Fasaye GA, LaSalle VH, Finch C (2003) Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women. Patient Educ Couns 51(2):107–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler L, Collier A, Brewster K, Smith C, Weathers B, Wileyto EP et al (2005) Attitudes about genetic testing and genetic testing intentions in African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Genet Med 7(4):230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leplege A, Schemann JF, Diakite B, Toure O, Ecosse E, Jaffre Y et al (2006) A new condition specific quality of life measure for the blind and the partially sighted in sub-Saharan Africa, the IOTAQOL: methodological aspects of the development procedure. Qual Life Res 15(8):1373–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman C, Biesecker B, Benkendorf JL, Kerner J, Gomez-Caminero A, Hughes C et al (1997) Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(2):148–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Steinberg AG, Bain L, Yaeger D, Bieler A, Ewing R et al (2007) Assessing parental attitudes toward genetic testing for childhood hearing loss: before and after genetic consultation. Am J Med Genet A 143A(14):1546–1553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch HT, Drouhard T, Vasen HF, Cavalieri J, Lynch J, Nord S et al (1996) Genetic counseling in a Navajo hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer kindred. Cancer 77(1):30–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren CE, Barton JC, Adams PC, Harris EL, Acton RT, Press N et al (2003) Hemochromatosis and iron overload screening (HEIRS) study design for an evaluation of 100,000 primary care-based adults. Am J Med Sci 325(2):53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Modell B, Darr A (2002) Science and society: genetic counseling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nat Rev Genet 3(3):225–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moronkola OA, Fadairo RA (2006) University students in Nigeria: knowledge, attitude toward sickle cell disease, and genetic counseling before marriage. Int Q Community Health Educ 26(1):85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morren M, Rijken M, Baanders AN, Bensing J (2007) Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn C, Watermeyer J, MacDonald C, Moabelo C (2010) Grandmothers as gems of genetic wisdom: exploring South African traditional beliefs about the causes of childhood genetic disorders. J Genet Couns 19(1):9–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EA, Milliron KJ, Lewis KE, Goold SD, Merajver SD (2002) Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(1):79–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse A, van Dulmen S, Ausems M, Schoemaker A, Beemer F, Bensing J (2005) QUOTE-gene(ca): development of a counselee-centered instrument to measure needs and preferences in genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Psychooncology 14(5):361–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raz AE, Schicktanz S (2009) Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel. Med Health Care Philos 12(4):433–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rew L, Mackert M, Bonevac D (2009) A systematic review of literature about the genetic testing of adolescents. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 14(4):284–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Peters N, Shea JA, Armstrong K (2005) The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States. J Health Commun 10(4):309–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sickle Cell Anaemia. 2006. Report by the Secretariat. World Health Organization. 59th World Health Assembly.

  • Tan EK, Lee J, Hunter C, Shinawi L, Fook-Chong S, Jankovic J (2007) Comparing knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing in Parkinson’s disease in an American and Asian population. J Neurol Sci 252(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S, Herbert D, Street A, Barnes C, Boal J, Komesaroff P (2007) Attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing in the haemophilia community: a qualitative study. Haemophilia 13(5):633–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER (eds) (2004) Measurement in nursing and health research, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

  • Wang C, Gonzalez R, Milliron KJ, Strecher VJ, Merajver SD (2005) Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. Am J Med Genet A 134A(1):66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yumuk PF, Gumus M, Ekenel M, Basaran G, Aliustaoglu M, Topal A et al (2004) Attitude toward genetic testing for cancer risk in Istanbul. Genet Test 8(2):169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health. We thank the patients and families for their participation and patience and express our gratitude to the many experts who contributed invaluable insight, including Dr. Gail Geller, Dr. Peter Winch, Dr. Marie Diener-West, Dr. Elizabeth Thomson, Dr. Lori Leonard, Mr. Donald Hadley, Dr. Benjamin Wilfond, and Dr. Kevin Flanigan. We also thank the Medical School and the Hospital of Point “G”, Bamako, Mali. The work was supported by funds from the NINDS and NINR intramural programs.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Gloria Meilleur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meilleur, K.G., Coulibaly, S., Traoré, M. et al. Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary neurological diseases in Mali. J Community Genet 2, 33–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-011-0038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-011-0038-0

Keywords

Navigation