Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatocellular carcinoma biology predicts survival outcome after liver transplantation in the USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathologic prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) stratified by tumor size.

Methods

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries (2004–2012), we retrieved data of 570 patients who underwent LT for a solitary primary HCC lesion ≤5 cm. A two multivariable Cox models were constructed to identify prognostic factors of CSS in a two different tumor sizes (2 cm cutoff).

Results

Out of 570 HCC patients (median age 57 years), 16% had microvascular invasion (MVI) and 12% had a poorly differentiated tumor. Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.6), tumor size >2 cm (OR 1.78), elevated AFP (OR 2.31), and poor tumor differentiation (OR 2.59) are significant predictors of MVI. With a median follow up of 41.5 months (range 1–107 months), the 5-year CSS rate was 90% in the absence of MVI compared to 75% in the presence of MVI (p<0.001). Multivariate models revealed that age ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08), MVI (HR 2.26), and poor tumor differentiation (HR 2.42), were significant risk factors of a dismal CSS with HCC size >2 cm, but not with HCC ≤2 cm.

Conclusions

Primary HCC tumor size ≤2 cm had an excellent prognosis after LT and was not affect by the presence of MVI or poor tumor differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: where are we? Where do we go? Hepatology. 2014;60:1767–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:519–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle MB, Vachharajani N, Maynard E, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results suggest excellent outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:19–28. discussion 28-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamura S, Kato T, Berho M, et al. Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 2001;136:25–30. discussion 31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwatsuki S, Gordon RD, Shaw BW Jr, Starzl TE. Role of liver transplantation in cancer therapy. Ann Surg. 1985;202:401–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cillo U, Vitale A, Bassanello M, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of moderately or well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;239:150–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang S, Lee YJ, Kim KH, et al. The impact of tumor size on long-term survival outcomes after resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: single-institution experience with 2558 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oishi K, Itamoto T, Amano H, et al. Clinicopathologic features of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roayaie S, Blume IN, Thung SN, et al. A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:850–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Han K, Tzimas GN, Barkun JS, et al. Preoperative alpha-fetoprotein slope is predictive of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after livertransplantation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao FY, Saab S, Bass NM, et al. Prediction of survival after liver retransplantation for late graft failure based on preoperative prognosticscores. Hepatology. 2004;39:230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmüller T, et al. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001;33:1080–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shindoh J, Andreou A, Aloia TA, et al. Microvascular invasion does not predict long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm: reappraisal of the staging system for solitary tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roayaie S, Obeidat K, Sposito C, et al. Resection of hepatocellular cancer ≤2 cm: results from two Western centers. Hepatology. 2013;57:1426–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamashita Y, Tsuijita E, Takeishi K, et al. Predictors for microinvasion of small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤2 cm. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2027–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology (ed 3). Geneva: Switzerland, World Health Organization; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. El-Fattah MA, Aboelmagd M, Elhamouly M. Prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma survival after radiofrequency ablation: a US population-based study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016; doi:10.1177/2050640616659024.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Serag HB, Davila JA. Is fibrolamellar carcinoma different from hepatocellular carcinoma? A US population-based study. Hepatology. 2004;39:798–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimada S, Kamiyama T, Yokoo H, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in young patients after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen CH, Chang TT, Cheng KS, et al. Do young hepatocellular carcinoma patients have worse prognosis? The paradox of age as a prognostic factor in the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Liver Int. 2006;26:766–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niederle IM, Wörns MA, Koch S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of young patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a large German cohort. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:775–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JH, Choi MS, Lee H, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in young patients from a hepatitis B-endemicarea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:588–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamazaki Y, Kakizaki S, Sohara N, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in young adults: the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and findings of a patient survival analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1103–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hyeon J, Ahn S, Lee JJ, Song DH, Park CK. Prognostic significance of BCL9 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Pathol. 2013;47:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah SA, Tan JC, McGilvray ID, et al. Does microvascular invasion affect outcomes after liver transplantation for HCC? A histopathological analysis of 155 consecutive explants. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:464–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan L, Mac MT, Frishberg DP, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in evaluating vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1556–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mazzaferro V, Bhoori S, Sposito C, et al. Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:S44–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sumie S, Kuromatsu R, Okuda K, et al. Microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictable clinicopathological factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sala M, Fuster J, Llovet JM, et al. High pathological risk of recurrence after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: an indication for salvage liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tangkijvanich P, Mahachai V, Suwangool P, Poovorawan Y. Gender difference in clinicopathologic features and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:1547–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Esnaola NF, Lauwers GY, Mirza NQ, et al. Predictors of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:224–32. discussion 232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McHugh PP, Gilbert J, Vera S, Koch A, Ranjan D, Gedaly R. Alpha-fetoprotein and tumour size are associated with microvascular invasion in explanted livers of patients undergoing transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shirabe K, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, et al. The predictors of microvascular invasion in candidates for liver transplantation with hepatocellular carcinoma—with special reference to the serum levels of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kornberg A, Freesmeyer M, Bärthel E, et al. 18F-FDG-uptake of hepatocellular carcinoma on PET predicts microvascular tumor invasion in liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:592–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Luong TV, Andreana L, Meyer T, Dhillon AP, Burroughs AK. A systematic review of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic variability. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:325–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hameed B, Mehta N, Sapisochin G, Roberts JP, Yao FY. Alpha-fetoprotein level >1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:945–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Shetty K, Timmins K, Brensinger C, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma validation of present selection criteria in predicting outcome. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:911–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Huang ZY, Liang BY, Xiong M, et al. Severity of cirrhosis should determine the operative modality for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated liver function. Surgery. 2016;159:621–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Esnaola NF, Mirza N, Lauwers GY, et al. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated in the United States, France, and Japan. Ann Surg. 2003;238:711–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng SS, Xu X, Wu J, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiences. Transplantation. 2008;85:1726–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jun L, Zhenlin Y, Renyan G, et al. Independent factors and predictive score for extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma following curative hepatectomy. Oncologist. 2012;17:963–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lu Y, Zhu M, Li W, et al. Alpha fetoprotein plays a critical role in promoting metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20:549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Duvoux C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Decaens T, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:986–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jin T, Peng H, Wu H. Clinical value of circulating liver cancer cells for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Biomed Rep. 2013;1:731–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abd El-Fattah.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was not funded.

Conflict of interest

MA El-F declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human informed consent

There were no human consents, as this study was a retrospective database report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Fattah, M.A. Hepatocellular carcinoma biology predicts survival outcome after liver transplantation in the USA. Indian J Gastroenterol 36, 117–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0732-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0732-x

Keywords

Navigation