Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein? — a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the performance for the prediction of perforated appendicitis of total bilirubin versus C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count, the time period of symptoms’ evolution, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

Methods

Prospective observational study, applying receiver operating characteristics curve analysis to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the tested variables.

Results

The period of symptom’s evolution was prolonged (105.2 ± 79.3 hours vs. 38.6 ± 17.5 hours), and CRP levels were higher in perforated appendicitis (176 ± 82.6 mg/l vs. 80 ± 76 mg/l). Most patients with perforated appendicitis had a SIRS score higher than 3 points. CRP (>76.7 mg/l), the time period of symptoms’ evolution (>34.5 hours), and SIRS (3 points or more), were the best cutoff values to predict perforated appendicitis.

Conclusions

Perforated appendicitis may be suspected based on CRP, SIRS and the time period of symptoms’ evolution. We do not recommend the use of total bilirubin to predict perforation in appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults — A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al. (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: Age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21: 313–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bickell NA, Aufses AH, Rojas M, et al. (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearney D, Cahill RA, O’Brien E, et al. (2008) Influence of delays on perforation risk in adults with acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1823–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: Spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Omundsen M, Dennett E (2006) Delay to appendectomy and associated morbidity: A retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 76:153–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS (2008) Incisional hernia after Mc-Burney incision: Retrospective case-control study of risk factors and surgical treatment. World J Surg 32:596–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Granström L (1998) Treatment of perforated appendicitis: An analysis of 362 patients treated during 8 years. Dig Surg 15:683–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bijnen CL, van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, et al. (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20: 215–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al. (1999) Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg 23:133–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al. (2000) The history is important in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 17:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beltrán MA, Tapia TF, Cruces KS, et al. (2005) Sintomatología atípica en pacientes con apendicitis: Estudio prospectivo. Rev Chil Cir 57:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tzanakis NE, Efstathiou SP, Danulidis K, et al. (2005) A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. World J Surg 29:1151–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beltrán MA, Villar RM, Cruces KS (2006) Application of a diagnostic score for appendicitis by health-related non-physician professionals. Rev Med Chil 134:39–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergeron E (2006) Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 49: 96–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, et al. (2000) Can perforated appendicitis be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors? J Gastrointest Surg 4:470–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin CJ, Chen JD, Tiu CM, et al. (2005) Can ruptured appendicitis be detected preoperatively in the ED? Am J Emerg Med 23:60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Estrada JJ, Petrosyan M, Barnhart J, et al. (2007) Hyperbilirubinemia in appendicitis: A new predictor of perforation. J Gastrointest Surg 11:714–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dawes T, Burrows C (2007) Abdominal pain and jaundice: Appendiceal perforation and important differential. Emerg Med Australasia 19:276–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gimson AES (1987) Hepatic dysfunction during bacterial sepsis. Intensive Care Med 13:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lau WY, Teoh-Chan CH, Fan ST, et al. (1984) The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg 200:576–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bennion RS, Baron EJ, Thompson JE, et al. (1990) The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis — Revisited. Ann Surg 211:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brienza N, Dalfino L, Cinnella G, et al. (2006) Jaundice in critical illness: Promoting factors of a concealed reality. Intensive Care Med 32:267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beltrán MA, Almonacid J, Vicencio A, et al. (2007) Predictive value of white blood cell count and C-reactive protein in children with appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 42: 1208–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. (2003) 2001 SCCM/ ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International sepsis definition conference. Intensive Care Med 29:530–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Albu E, Miller MM, Choi Y, et al. (1994) Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 37:49–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grönroos JM, Forsström JJ, Irjala K, et al. (1994) Phospholipase A 2, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Chem 40:1757–1760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Birchley D (2006) Patients with clinical acute appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, et al. (2006) Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 76:71–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keskek M, Tez M, Yoldas O, et al. (2008) Receiver operating characteristic analysis of leukocyte counts in operations for suspected appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 26:769–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ortega-Deballon P, Ruiz de Adana-Belbel JC, Hernández-Matías A, et al. (2008) Usefulness of laboratory data in the management of right iliac fossa pain in adults. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Póvoa P, Almeida E, Moreira P, et al. (1998) C-reactive protein as an indicator of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 24: 1052–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Póvoa P (2002) C-reactive protein: A valuable marker of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 28:235–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sierra R, Rello J, Bailén MA, et al. (2004) C-reactive protein used as an early indicator of infection in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Intensive Care Med 30:2038–2045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang YS, Min SY, Joo SH, et al. (2008) Septic thrombophlebitis of the porto-mesenteric veins as a complication of acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 14: 4580–4582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh S, Evans TW (2006) Organ dysfunction during sepsis. Intensive Care Med 32:349–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Emergency Unit, Universidad Catolica Del Norte, Hospital De La Serena, La Serena, Chile

    Marcelo A. Beltran, Pedro E. Mendez, Rodrigo E. Barrera, Mario A. Contreras, Christian S. Wilson, Victor J. Cortes & Karina S. Cruces

Authors
  1. Marcelo A. Beltran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro E. Mendez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo E. Barrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario A. Contreras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian S. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Victor J. Cortes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karina S. Cruces
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo A. Beltran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beltran, M.A., Mendez, P.E., Barrera, R.E. et al. Is hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein? — a prospective study. Indian J Surg 71, 265–272 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0074-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0074-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation