Skip to main content
Log in

Established treatment concepts for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSSC)

  • short review
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are still difficult to treat. The EXTREME regimen has been the standard of care for the last decade, but recent studies initiated a change. In this work we provide an overview of the established treatment concepts for recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck with palliative intent.

Material and methods

We performed a literature search using the key words: recurrent, metastatic, cancer, head and neck, HNSCC, treatment, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, salvage, and surgery. Furthermore, the presentations of the ASCO highlights of head and neck cancer from 2019 and 2020 were included.

Results

The KEYNOTE-048 and the TPEx randomized trial are the most relevant trials in the first line setting. The CheckMate 141 and KEYNOTE-040 have the greatest impact for the second line regimen.

Conclusion

The expression of PD-L1, prior treatment, performance status, local symptoms and tumor burden are the most important factors regarding choice of treatment. Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy can be recommend as the 1st line standard in patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥20. The choice of therapy in patients with CPS 1-19 and CPS <1 has to be individually evaluated for each patient. Furthermore, TPEx is an encouraging alternative to the EXTREME regimen with less toxicity and improved quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASCO:

American Society of Clinical Oncology

CI:

Confidence interval

CPS:

Combined positive score

CT:

Chemotherapy

G‑CSF:

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

HNSCC:

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

ORR:

Objective response rate

OS:

Overall survival

PD-L1:

Programmed cell death 1 ligand

PFS:

Progression-free survival

R/M:

Recurrent and/or metastatic

TPS:

Tumor proportion score

References

  1. Saada-Bouzid E, Peyrade F, Guigay J. Immunotherapy in recurrent and or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol. 2019;31(3):146–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guigay J, Tahara M, Licitra L, Keilholz U, Friesland S, Witzler P, et al. The evolving role of taxanes in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: evidence, advantages, and future directions. Front Oncol. 2019;9:668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Adelstein D, Gillison ML, Pfister DG, Spencer S, Adkins D, Brizel DM, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: head and neck cancers, version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(6):761–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinbichler TB, Lichtenecker M, Anegg M, Dejaco D, Kofler B, Schartinger VH, et al. Persistent head and neck cancer following first-line treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(11):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10110421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR, Mickiewicz E, Winquist E, Gorbounova V, et al. Cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1705–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodwin WJ Jr.. Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means? Laryngoscope. 2000;110(3 Pt 2 Suppl 93):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauml J, Seiwert TY, Pfister DG, Worden F, Liu SV, Gilbert J, et al. Pembrolizumab for platinum- and cetuximab-refractory head and neck cancer: results from a single-arm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(14):1542–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, Remenar E, Kawecki A, Rottey S, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Szturz P, Vermorken JB. Immunotherapy in head and neck cancer: aiming at EXTREME precision. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0879-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Specenier P, Vermorken JB. Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):901–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G Jr., et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guigay J, Fayette J, Mesia R, Lafond C, Saada-Bouzid E, Geoffrois L, et al. TPExtreme randomized trial: TPEx versus Extreme regimen in 1st line recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):6002. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.6002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr., Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2‑year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018;81:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra L, Ahn MJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):156–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferris RL, Licitra L, Fayette J, Even C, Blumenschein G Jr., Harrington KJ, et al. Nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: efficacy and safety in checkmate 141 by prior cetuximab use. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(17):5221–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guigay J, Fayette J, Mesia R, Saada-Bouzid E, Lafond C, Geoffrois L, et al. TPExtreme randomized trial: Quality of Life (QoL) and survival according to second-line treatments in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):6507. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.6507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saleh K, Daste A, Martin N, Pons-Tostivint E, Auperin A, Herrera-Gomez RG, et al. Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer. 2019;121:123–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca .2019.08.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Study of nivolumab in combination with Ipilimumab compared to the standard of care (extreme regimen) as first line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02741570. Accessed 19 june 2020.

  19. Phase III open label study of MEDI 4736 with/without tremelimumab versus standard of care (SOC) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02551159. Accessed 19 june 2020.

  20. Ferris RL, Haddad R, Even C, Tahara M, Dvorkin M, Ciuleanu TE, et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):942–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Siu LL, Even C, Mesía R, Remenar E, Daste A, Delord JP, et al. Safety and efficacy of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with PD-L1-low/negative recurrent or metastatic HNSCC: the phase 2 CONDOR randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(2):195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Kloppenburg MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Kloppenburg, F. Mildner, M.T. Kasseroler, D. Dejaco, and A. Amann declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kloppenburg, M., Mildner, F., Kasseroler, M.T. et al. Established treatment concepts for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSSC). memo 13, 395–399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-020-00645-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-020-00645-6

Keywords

Navigation