Summary
Background
Recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are still difficult to treat. The EXTREME regimen has been the standard of care for the last decade, but recent studies initiated a change. In this work we provide an overview of the established treatment concepts for recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck with palliative intent.
Material and methods
We performed a literature search using the key words: recurrent, metastatic, cancer, head and neck, HNSCC, treatment, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, salvage, and surgery. Furthermore, the presentations of the ASCO highlights of head and neck cancer from 2019 and 2020 were included.
Results
The KEYNOTE-048 and the TPEx randomized trial are the most relevant trials in the first line setting. The CheckMate 141 and KEYNOTE-040 have the greatest impact for the second line regimen.
Conclusion
The expression of PD-L1, prior treatment, performance status, local symptoms and tumor burden are the most important factors regarding choice of treatment. Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy can be recommend as the 1st line standard in patients with combined positive score (CPS) ≥20. The choice of therapy in patients with CPS 1-19 and CPS <1 has to be individually evaluated for each patient. Furthermore, TPEx is an encouraging alternative to the EXTREME regimen with less toxicity and improved quality of life.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ASCO:
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CPS:
-
Combined positive score
- CT:
-
Chemotherapy
- G‑CSF:
-
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
- HNSCC:
-
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- ICI:
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- ORR:
-
Objective response rate
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PD-L1:
-
Programmed cell death 1 ligand
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
- R/M:
-
Recurrent and/or metastatic
- TPS:
-
Tumor proportion score
References
Saada-Bouzid E, Peyrade F, Guigay J. Immunotherapy in recurrent and or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Oncol. 2019;31(3):146–51.
Guigay J, Tahara M, Licitra L, Keilholz U, Friesland S, Witzler P, et al. The evolving role of taxanes in combination with cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: evidence, advantages, and future directions. Front Oncol. 2019;9:668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00668.
Adelstein D, Gillison ML, Pfister DG, Spencer S, Adkins D, Brizel DM, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: head and neck cancers, version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(6):761–70.
Steinbichler TB, Lichtenecker M, Anegg M, Dejaco D, Kofler B, Schartinger VH, et al. Persistent head and neck cancer following first-line treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(11):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10110421.
Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR, Mickiewicz E, Winquist E, Gorbounova V, et al. Cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1705–15.
Goodwin WJ Jr.. Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means? Laryngoscope. 2000;110(3 Pt 2 Suppl 93):1–18.
Bauml J, Seiwert TY, Pfister DG, Worden F, Liu SV, Gilbert J, et al. Pembrolizumab for platinum- and cetuximab-refractory head and neck cancer: results from a single-arm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(14):1542–9.
Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, Remenar E, Kawecki A, Rottey S, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116–27.
Szturz P, Vermorken JB. Immunotherapy in head and neck cancer: aiming at EXTREME precision. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0879-4.
Specenier P, Vermorken JB. Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):901–15.
Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G Jr., et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1915–28.
Guigay J, Fayette J, Mesia R, Lafond C, Saada-Bouzid E, Geoffrois L, et al. TPExtreme randomized trial: TPEx versus Extreme regimen in 1st line recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):6002. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.6002.
Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr., Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2‑year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol. 2018;81:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.008.
Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra L, Ahn MJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):156–67.
Ferris RL, Licitra L, Fayette J, Even C, Blumenschein G Jr., Harrington KJ, et al. Nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: efficacy and safety in checkmate 141 by prior cetuximab use. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(17):5221–30.
Guigay J, Fayette J, Mesia R, Saada-Bouzid E, Lafond C, Geoffrois L, et al. TPExtreme randomized trial: Quality of Life (QoL) and survival according to second-line treatments in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15_suppl):6507. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.6507.
Saleh K, Daste A, Martin N, Pons-Tostivint E, Auperin A, Herrera-Gomez RG, et al. Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur J Cancer. 2019;121:123–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca .2019.08.026.
Study of nivolumab in combination with Ipilimumab compared to the standard of care (extreme regimen) as first line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02741570. Accessed 19 june 2020.
Phase III open label study of MEDI 4736 with/without tremelimumab versus standard of care (SOC) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02551159. Accessed 19 june 2020.
Ferris RL, Haddad R, Even C, Tahara M, Dvorkin M, Ciuleanu TE, et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):942–50.
Siu LL, Even C, Mesía R, Remenar E, Daste A, Delord JP, et al. Safety and efficacy of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with PD-L1-low/negative recurrent or metastatic HNSCC: the phase 2 CONDOR randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(2):195–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Kloppenburg, F. Mildner, M.T. Kasseroler, D. Dejaco, and A. Amann declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kloppenburg, M., Mildner, F., Kasseroler, M.T. et al. Established treatment concepts for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSSC). memo 13, 395–399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-020-00645-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-020-00645-6