Skip to main content
Log in

The cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of a long duration electronic control device exposure in human volunteers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic control devices (ECD) have become popular in law enforcement because they have filled a gap left by other law enforcement devices, tactics, or tools and have been shown to reduce officer and suspect injuries. Civilians are using the same technology for defensive purposes. TASER C2 is the latest generation civilian-marketed device from the manufacturer. Unlike the law enforcement devices, the device discharges for 30 s continuously. This study is the first to look at the cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of this device on human subjects. This was a prospective, observational study of human subjects involved in a training course. Subjects were exposed for 30 s on the anterior thorax. Vital signs, ECG, troponin I, pH, lactate, and creatine kinase (CK) were measured before and immediately after the exposure. Troponin I, pH, lactate, and CK were measured again 24 h after the exposure. Continuous spirometry was used to evaluate the respiratory effects. Echocardiography was also performed before, during, and immediately after the exposure to determine heart rate and rhythm. Eleven subjects completed the study. There were no clinically important electrocardiogram changes and no positive troponins. Spirometry showed an increase in minute ventilation during the exposure. There was no important change in CK at 24 h. Lactate was slightly higher and pH was slightly lower after the exposure, but similar to the effects of physical exertion. Echocardiography was performed in 6 subjects. In half of these subjects, the rhythm was determined to be “sinus” and in the other half the rhythm was indeterminant. In our study, the civilian device caused a mild lactic acidosis. No other important physiologic effects were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacDonald JM, Kaminski RJ, Smith, M. The effect of less-lethal weapons on injures in police use-of-force events. Am J Public Health. 2009; 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159616.

  2. Smith M, Kaminski R, Rojek J, Alpert G, Mathis J. The impact of conducted energy devices and other types of force and resistance on officer and suspect injuries. PIJPSM. 2007;30(2):423–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkinson E, Neeson C, Bleetman A. The relative risk of police use-of-force options: evaluating the potential for deployment of electronic weaponry. J Clin Forensic Med. 2006;13:229–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee B, Vittinghoff E, Whiteman D, Park M, Lau L, Tseng Z. Relation of TASER (electrical stun gun) deployment to increase in in-custody sudden deaths. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103(6):877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Despa F, Basati S, Zhang Z, D’Andrea J, Reilly J, Bodnar E, Lee R. Electromuscular incapacitation results from stimulation of spinal reflexes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:411–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reilly J, Diamant A, Comeaux J. Dosimetry considerations for electrical stun devices. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun H, Webster J. Estimating neuromuscular stimulation within the human torso with TASER stimulus. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6401–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jauchem J, Seaman R, Klages C. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 electronic control device. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5:189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vilke G, Sloane C, Bouton K, et al. Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(5):569–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sloane C, Chan T, Levine S, Dunford J, Neuman T, Vilke G. Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the TASER X26. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(1):29–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vilke GM, Sloane C, Levine S, Neuman T, Castillo E, Chan T. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the TASER X26. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho JD, Miner JR, Lakireddy DR, et al. Cardiovascular and physiologic effects of conducted electrical weapon discharge in resting adults. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bozeman W, Barnes D, Winslow J, Johnson J, Phillips C, Alson R. Immediate cardiovascular effects of the TASER X26 conducted electrical weapon. J Emerg Med. 2009;26:567–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine S, Sloane C, Chan T, Dunford J, Vilke G. Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the TASER. J Emerg Med. 2007;33:113–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. VanMeenen K, Cherniack N, Bergen M, Gleason L, Teichman R, Servatius R. Cardiovascular evaluation of electronic control device exposure in law enforcement trainees: a multisite study. JOEM 2010; (in press).

  16. Ho J, Dawes D, Cole J, Hottinger J, Overton K, Miner J. Lactate and pH evaluation in exhausted humans with prolonged TASER X26 exposure or continued exertion. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; (in press).

  17. Allsop P, Cheetham M, Brooks S, Hall GM, Williams C. Continuous intramuscular pH measurement during the recovery from brief, maximal exercise in man. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1990;59:465–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho J, Dawes D, Bultman L, Thacker J, Skinner L, Bahr J, Johnson M, Miner J. Respiratory effect of prolonged electrical weapon application on human volunteers. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF, Lapine AL, Dolan BJ, Lundin EJ, Miner JR. Echocardiographic evaluation of a TASER-X26 application in the ideal human cardiac axis. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(9):838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Miner JR. Echocardiographic evaluation of TASER X26 probe deployment into the chests of human volunteers. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(1):49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho J, Dawes D, et al. Ultrasound measurement of cardiac activity during conducted electrical weapon application in exercising adults. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(3):S108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawes D, Ho J, Reardon R, Sweeney J, Miner J. The physiologic effects of multiple simultaneous electronic control device discharges. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11:49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bozeman W. Additional information on TASER safety. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(5):758–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall C, Butler C, Kadar A, Palmer S. Police use of force, injuries and death: prospective evaluation of outcomes for all police use of force/restraint including conducted energy weapons in a large Canadian city. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:S198–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McManus J, Forsyth T, Hawks R, Jui J. A retrospective case series describing the injury pattern of the advanced M26 TASER in Multnomah County, Oregon. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bozeman W, Teacher E, Winslow J. Incidence and outcomes of transcardiac TASER probe deployments. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:S196.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Swerdlow C, Fishbein M, Chaman L, Lakkireddy D, Tchou P. Presenting rhythm in sudden death temporally proximate to discharge of TASER conducted electrical weapons. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ordog GL, Wasserberger J, Schlater T, Balasubramanium S. Electronic gun (TASER) injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(1):73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study authors would like to acknowledge the following for their assistance in this project: Andrew Hinz and Matt Carver.

Conflict of interest statement

TASER International provided funding for this study. Drs. Dawes and Ho are external medical consultants to TASER International and stockholders. Dr. Ho is also the medical director for TASER International.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey D. Ho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawes, D.M., Ho, J.D., Reardon, R.F. et al. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of a long duration electronic control device exposure in human volunteers. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6, 268–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9166-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9166-9

Keywords

Navigation