Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Current and Future Use of Telemedicine in Infectious Diseases Practice

  • Technology and Infectious Disease (C Hebert, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Infectious Disease Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Novel technologies, such as high-definition cameras, encryption software, electronic stethoscopes, microfluidic diagnostic systems, and widely available broadband Internet have expanded the potential for telemedicine. This narrative review presents current and future uses of telemedicine in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, stewardship, and management of infectious disease.

Recent Findings

Beginning in the 1990s, early approaches to telemedicine in infectious disease focused largely on treatment of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis. However, recent innovations allow for targeting of additional diseases and in increasingly remote settings. Telemedicine allows virtual visits between patients in the home and remote providers, permitting outpatient management of complex conditions, such as post-surgical site monitoring, and non-urgent infectious maladies, such as uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Remote provider education by videoconference and integrated clinical decision support tools create avenues to improve inpatient care, including antimicrobial stewardship. Technological strides from miniaturization of diagnostic tests to robotic telepresence physical exams improve access to infectious disease care in isolated and infrastructure-poor environments, from cargo ships to other resource-limited settings.

Summary

Telemedicine in the field of infectious disease is rapidly expanding in clinical, technological, geographical, and human capacity. Recent innovations narrow gaps in access to care for populations traditionally underserved, stigmatized, isolated by remote geography, or lacking technological infrastructure. Current and future approaches will transform inpatient, outpatient, and remote care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Americal Telemedicine Association. Telemedicine glossary. Available at: https://thesource.americantelemed.org/resources/telemedicine-glossary. Accessed April 3, 2019.

  2. Pottinger PS, Kassamali Z, Wright TC, Scott JD, Martinez-Paz N, Lynch JB. Tele-antimicrobial stewardship in action. Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases. 2018;10:229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parmar P, Mackie D, Varghese S, Cooper C. Use of telemedicine technologies in the management of infectious diseases: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1084–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker C. High-tech treatment: federal grant allows HIV/AIDS patients to receive treatment through telemedicine. Mod Healthc. 2002;32:18–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Makulowich JS. AIDS and telemedicine. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 1996;10:387–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossaro L, Aoki C, Yuk J, Prosser C, Goforth J, Martinez F. The evaluation of patients with hepatitis C living in rural California via telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:1127–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. DeMaio J, Schwartz L, Cooley P, Tice A. The application of telemedicine technology to a directly observed therapy program for tuberculosis: a pilot project. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:2082–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMaio J, Sharma D. Tuberculosis therapy and telemedicine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002;3:1283–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siddiqui J, Herchline T, Kahlon S, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America position statement on telehealth and telemedicine as applied to the practice of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:237–42 Comprehensive position statement outlining goals for HIPAA, licensure and credentialing, scope of care, quality, and liability.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aicken CR, Fuller SS, Sutcliffe LJ, et al. Young people’s perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:974.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman AL, Brookmeyer KA, Kachur RE, Ford J, Hogben M, Habel MA, et al. An assessment of the GYT: get yourself tested! Campaign: an integrated approach to sexually transmitted disease prevention communication. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:151–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Refugio ON, Kimble MM, Silva CL, Lykens JE, Bannister C, Klausner JD. Brief report: PrEPtech: A telehealth-based initiation program for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in young men of color who have sex with men: a pilot study of feasibility. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80:40–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daher J, Vijh R, Linthwaite B, et al. Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996–2017). BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017604 Scoping review of efficacy and treatment outcomes from HIV/STI telemedicine interventions, including mobile phone/SMS, Web application, or social media.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the screening, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis C infection. World Health Organization, 2016.

  15. Gonzalez SA, Fierer DS, Talal AH. Medical and behavioral approaches to engage people who inject drugs into care for hepatitis C virus infection. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2017;16:S1–s23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohsen W, Chan P, Whelan M, Glass A, Mouton M, Young E, et al. Hepatitis C treatment for difficult to access populations: can telementoring (as distinct from telemedicine) help? Intern Med J. 2019;49:351–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Talal AH, McLeod A, Andrews P, Nieves-McGrath H, Chen Y, Reynolds A, et al. Patient reaction to telemedicine for clinical management of hepatitis C virus integrated into an opioid treatment program. Telemed J E Health. 2018.

  18. You A, Kawamoto J, Smith JP. A pharmacist-managed telemedicine clinic for hepatitis C care: a descriptive analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20:99–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morey S, Hamoodi A, Jones D, Young T, Thompson C, Dhuny J, et al. Increased diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C in prison by universal offer of testing and use of telemedicine. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26:101–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lloyd AR, Clegg J, Lange J, Stevenson A, Post JJ, Lloyd D, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a nurse-led outreach program for assessment and treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the custodial setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1078–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keogh K, Clark P, Valery PC, McPhail SM, Bradshaw C, Day M, et al. Use of telehealth to treat and manage chronic viral hepatitis in regional Queensland. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22:459–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo ER, Perumpail RB, Cholankeril G, Jayasekera CR, Ahmed A. The role of e-health in optimizing task-shifting in the delivery of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23:870–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Belperio PS, Chartier M, Ross DB, Alaigh P, Shulkin D. Curing hepatitis C virus infection: best practices from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:499–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arora S, Kalishman S, Thornton K, Dion D, Murata G, Deming P, et al. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment--extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52:1124–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Arora S, Thornton K, Jenkusky SM, Parish B, Scaletti JV. Project ECHO: linking university specialists with rural and prison-based clinicians to improve care for people with chronic hepatitis C in New Mexico. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(Suppl 2):74–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Beste LA, Glorioso TJ, Ho PM, Au DH, Kirsh SR, Todd-Stenberg J, et al. Telemedicine specialty support promotes hepatitis C treatment by primary care providers in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Med. 2017;130:432–8.e3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ness TE, Annese MF, Martinez-Paz N, Unruh KT, Scott JD, Wood BR. Using an innovative telehealth model to support community providers who deliver perinatal HIV care. AIDS Educ Prev. 2017;29:516–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wood BR, Mann MS, Martinez-Paz N, Unruh KT, Annese M, Spach DH, et al. Project ECHO: telementoring to educate and support prescribing of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by community medical providers. Sex Health. 2018;15:601–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stevenson LD, Banks RE, Stryczek KC, Crnich CJ, Ide EM, Wilson BM, et al. A pilot study using telehealth to implement antimicrobial stewardship at two rural Veterans Affairs medical centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:1163–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on HIV, 2016–2021. World Health Organization, 2016.

  31. Henny KD, Wilkes AL, McDonald CM, Denson DJ, Neumann MS. A rapid review of e-health interventions addressing the continuum of HIV care (2007-2017). AIDS Behav. 2018;22:43–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Schnall R, Travers J, Rojas M, Carballo-Dieguez A. E-health interventions for HIV prevention in high-risk men who have sex with men: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e134.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kurth AE, Chhun N, Cleland CM, Crespo-Fierro M, Parés-Avila JA, Lizcano JA, et al. Linguistic and cultural adaptation of a computer-based counseling program (care+ spanish) to support HIV treatment adherence and risk reduction for people living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e195.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurth AE, Spielberg F, Cleland CM, Lambdin B, Bangsberg DR, Frick PA, et al. Computerized counseling reduces HIV-1 viral load and sexual transmission risk: findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:611–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Le Doare K, Mackie NE, Kaye S, Bamford A, Walters S, Foster C. Virtual support for paediatric HIV treatment decision making. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100:527–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jirawison C, Yen M, Leenasirimakul P, Chen J, Guadanant S, Kunavisarut P, et al. Telemedicine screening for cytomegalovirus retinitis at the point of care for human immunodeficiency virus infection. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:198–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yen M, Ausayakhun S, Chen J, Ausayakhun S, Jirawison C, Heiden D, et al. Telemedicine diagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis by nonophthalmologists. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:1052–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PReP) for HIV prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/PrEP_fact_sheet_final.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2019.

  39. Muessig KE, Bien CH, Wei C, Lo EJ, Yang M, Tucker JD, et al. A mixed-methods study on the acceptability of using e-health for HIV prevention and sexual health care among men who have sex with men in China. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. • Udeagu CN, Shah S, Toussaint MM, Pickett L. Sociodemographic differences in clients preferring video-call over in-person interview: a pilot study of HIV tele-partner services. AIDS Behav. 2017;21:3078–86 Insight into demographic characteristics defining user preferences in telemedicine implementations.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stekler JD, McMahan V, Ballinger L, Viquez L, Swanson F, Stockton J, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis prescribing through telehealth. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77:e40–e2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections, 2016–2021: World Health Organization; 2016.

  43. •• Estcourt CS, Gibbs J, Sutcliffe LJ, Gkatzidou V, Tickle L, Hone K, et al. The e-sexual health clinic system for management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections: exploratory studies in people testing for chlamydia trachomatis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e182–e90 An exemplary telemedicine system implemented through a Web portal.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. • Gibbs J, Sutcliffe LJ, Gkatzidou V, et al. The e-clinical care pathway framework: a novel structure for creation of online complex clinical care pathways and its application in the management of sexually transmitted infections. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16:98 This report outlines a framework for developing a telemedicine pathway, incorporating clinical needs and usability.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Aicken CRH, Sutcliffe LJ, Gibbs J, Tickle LJ, Hone K, Harding-Esch EM, et al. Using the e-sexual health clinic to access chlamydia treatment and care via the internet: a qualitative interview study. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:241–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chabot C, Gilbert M, Haag D, Ogilvie G, Hawe P, Bungay V, et al. Anticipating the potential for positive uptake and adaptation in the implementation of a publicly funded online STBBI testing service: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Spielberg F, Levy V, Lensing S, Chattopadhyay I, Venkatasubramanian L, Acevedo N, et al. Fully integrated e-services for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections: results of a 4-county study in California. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2313–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Analysis of teladoc use seems to indicate expanded access to care for patients without prior connection to a provider. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:258–64.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Uscher-Pines L, Mulcahy A, Cowling D, Hunter G, Burns R, Mehrotra A. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1234–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gordon AS, Adamson WC, DeVries AR. Virtual visits for acute, nonurgent care: a claims analysis of episode-level utilization. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Schoenfeld AJ, Davies JM, Marafino BJ, Dean M, DeJong C, Bardach NS, et al. Variation in quality of urgent health care provided during commercial virtual visits. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:635–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sanger PC, Hartzler A, Han SM, Armstrong CAL, Stewart MR, Lordon RJ, et al. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114016.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Whitby M, McLaws ML, Collopy B, et al. Post-discharge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections? J Hosp Infect. 2002;52:155–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gunter R, Fernandes-Taylor S, Mahnke A, Awoyinka L, Schroeder C, Wiseman J, et al. Evaluating patient usability of an image-based mobile health platform for postoperative wound monitoring. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Totty JP, Harwood AE, Wallace T, Smith GE, Chetter IC. Use of photograph-based telemedicine in postoperative wound assessment to diagnose or exclude surgical site infection. J Wound Care. 2018;27:128–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Gunter R, Barnes ML, Saunders RS, Rathouz PJ, et al. Inter-rater agreement and checklist validation for postoperative wound assessment using smartphone images in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016;4:320–8.e2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Barnes ML, Tomsejova A, Saunders RS, Kent KC. Conceptualizing smartphone use in outpatient wound assessment: patients’ and caregivers’ willingness to use technology. J Surg Res. 2015;198:245–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2018. World Health Organization, 2018.

  60. Karumbi J, Garner P. Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:Cd003343.

  61. World Health Organization. Handbook for the use of digital technologies to support tuberculosis medication adherence. World Health Organization, 2018.

  62. Garfein RS, Collins K, Munoz F, et al. Feasibility of tuberculosis treatment monitoring by video directly observed therapy: a binational pilot study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:1057–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Macaraig M, Lobato MN, McGinnis Pilote K, Wegener D. A national survey on the use of electronic directly observed therapy for treatment of tuberculosis. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018;24:567–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. • Poon SJ, Schuur JD, Mehrotra A. Trends in visits to acute care venues for treatment of low-acuity conditions in the united states from 2008 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1342–9 Large-scale claims data analysis of utilization and cost comparing telemedicine to other methods of acute care delivery.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Shi Z, Mehrotra A, Gidengil CA, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Ray KN. Quality of care for acute respiratory infections during direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits for adults. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37:2014–23.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tan SJ, Ingram PR, Rothnie AJ, Whitmore TJ, Robinson JO, Hatch JB, et al. Successful outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy delivery via telemedicine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:2898–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ray KN, Shi Z, Gidengil CA, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Antibiotic prescribing during pediatric direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. Pediatrics. 2019;143:e20182491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Davis CB, Marzec LN, Blea Z, Godfrey D, Bickley D, Michael SS, et al. Antibiotic prescribing patterns for sinusitis within a direct-to-consumer virtual urgent care. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25:519–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Halpren-Ruder D, Chang AM, Hollander JE, Shah A. Quality assurance in telehealth: adherence to evidence-based indicators. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25:599–603.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Martinez KA, Rood M, Jhangiani N, Kou L, Boissy A, Rothberg MB. Association between antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections and patient satisfaction in direct-to-consumer telemedicine. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1558–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Martinez KA, Rood M, Jhangiani N, Boissy A, Rothberg MB. Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections and encounter length: an observational study of telemedicine. Ann Intern Med. 2018.

  72. Strymish J, Gupte G, Afable MK, Gupta K, Kim EJ, Vimalananda V, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults): advancing infectious disease care in a large veterans affairs healthcare system. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1123–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Driessen J, Chang W, Patel P, Wright RM, Ernst K, Handler SM. Nursing home provider perceptions of telemedicine for providing specialty consults. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24:510–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Najafi N, Harrison JD, Duong J, Greenberg A, Cheng HQ. It all just clicks: development of an inpatient e-consult program. J Hosp Med. 2017;12:332–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Monkowski D, Rhodes LV, Templer S, et al. A retrospective cohort study to assess the impact of an inpatient infectious disease telemedicine consultation service on hospital and patient outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2019.

  76. North F, Uthke LD, Tulledge-Scheitel SM. Internal e-consultations in an integrated multispecialty practice: a retrospective review of use, content, and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:151–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. • Machado SM, Wilson EH, Elliott JO, Jordan K. Impact of a telemedicine eICU cart on sepsis management in a community hospital emergency department. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:202–8 This study reports a novel telemedicine solution to the treatment of sepsis using mobile telepresence.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Morquin D, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Koumar Y, Bourret R, Reynes J. Implementing a tele-expertise system to optimise the antibiotic use and stewardship: the case of the Montpellier University Hospital (France). Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:296–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. The Joint Commission. Approved: new antimicrobial stewardship standard. Joint Commission Perspectives. 2016;36.

  80. Howell CK, Jacob J, Mok S. Remote antimicrobial stewardship: a solution for meeting the joint commission stewardship standard? Hosp Pharm. 2019;54:51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Beaulac K, Corcione S, Epstein L, Davidson LE, Doron S. Antimicrobial stewardship in a long-term acute care hospital using offsite electronic medical record audit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:433–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. • Dos Santos RP, Dalmora CH, Lukasewicz SA, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship through telemedicine and its impact on multi-drug resistance. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25:294–300 This study reports successful asynchronous approach for antimicrobial stewardship.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ceradini J, Tozzi AE, D'Argenio P, et al. Telemedicine as an effective intervention to improve antibiotic appropriateness prescription and to reduce costs in pediatrics. Ital J Pediatr. 2017;43:105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. • MacRury S, Stephen K, Main F, Gorman J, Jones S, Macfarlane D. Reducing amputations in people with diabetes (RAPID): evaluation of a new care pathway. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15 A two-phase pilot for a unique technical solution for low Internet connectivity settings.

  85. Khan I, Ndubuka N, Stewart K, McKinney V, Mendez I. The use of technology to improve health care to Saskatchewan’s first nations communities. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017;43:120–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Mashru J, Kirlew M, Saginur R, Schreiber YS. Management of infectious diseases in remote northwestern Ontario with telemedicine videoconference consultations. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:83–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Prieto-Egido I, Gonzalez-Escalada A, Garcia-Giganto V, Martinez-Fernandez A. Design of new procedures for diagnosing prevalent diseases using a low-cost telemicroscopy system. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:952–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gulley ML, Morgan DR. Molecular oncology testing in resource-limited settings. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:601–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Maffert P, Reverchon S, Nasser W, Rozand C, Abaibou H. New nucleic acid testing devices to diagnose infectious diseases in resource-limited settings. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:1717–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Dendere R, Myburg N, Douglas TS. A review of cellphone microscopy for disease detection. J Microsc. 2015;260:248–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Jiang L, Mancuso M, Lu Z, Akar G, Cesarman E, Erickson D. Solar thermal polymerase chain reaction for smartphone-assisted molecular diagnostics. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4137.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Yeo SJ, Choi K, Cuc BT, Hong NN, Bao DT, Ngoc NM, et al. Smartphone-based fluorescent diagnostic system for highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses. Theranostics. 2016;6:231–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhao C, Liu X. A portable paper-based microfluidic platform for multiplexed electrochemical detection of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus antibodies in serum. Biomicrofluidics. 2016;10:024119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Wang LJ, Naude N, Demissie M, et al. Analytical validation of an ultra low-cost mobile phone microplate reader for infectious disease testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;482:21–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Carter T, Jepsen JR. Exposures and health effects at sea: report on the NIVA course: maritime occupational medicine, exposures and health effects at sea, Elsinore, Denmark, May 2014. Int Marit Health. 2014;65:114–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Marimoutou C, Tufo D, Chaudet H, Abdul Samad M, Gentile G, Drancourt M. Infection burden among medical events onboard cargo ships: a four-year study. J Travel Med. 2017;24.

  97. Dehours E, Saccavini A, Roucolle P, Roux P, Bounes V. Added value of sending photograph in diagnosing a medical disease declared at sea: experience of the French tele-medical assistance service. Int Marit Health. 2017;68:122–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ohl ME, Richardson K, Kaboli PJ, Perencevich EN, Vaughan-Sarrazin M. Geographic access and use of infectious diseases specialty and general primary care services by veterans with HIV infection: implications for telehealth and shared care programs. J Rural Health. 2014;30:412–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan E. Gregory.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Caitlin E. Coombes and Megan E. Gregory declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Technology and Infectious Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coombes, C.E., Gregory, M.E. The Current and Future Use of Telemedicine in Infectious Diseases Practice. Curr Infect Dis Rep 21, 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-019-0697-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-019-0697-2

Keywords

Navigation