Abstract
Background
Hip fracture is common in the geriatric population. These patients have multiple comorbidities that complicate treatment and recovery such that poor functional outcomes often result. Since functional outcomes are associated with comorbidities and complications it is important to define the contributing factors.
Aims
To describe comorbidities common to geriatric hip fracture patients and determine predictability of complications and mortality based on comorbidities.
Methods
Data in this study were sourced from information prospectively collected for evaluation of a new orthogeriatric service established at a University Teaching Hospital over the period of 1 year.
Results
The median age was 82 years (range 54–100) and 73 % were female (N = 206). Common comorbidities included hypertension (51 %), dementia (28 %), osteoporosis (19 %), ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (15 %) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15 %). In predicting 1-year mortality based on comorbidities, the final model included age, IHD, delay to surgery and explained 26 % of the variability in mortality. Predicting 1-year mortality based on complications, the final model included age and respiratory complications and explained 26 % of the variability in mortality. There was a significant association between having respiratory complications and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001) with 63 % of those with respiratory complications having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Conclusions
This study highlights specific patient comorbidities and medical complications that could be used to guide clinical assessment, management and targeted interventions that improve outcomes in this patient group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, Johnston DWC, Buckingham J, Majumdar SR (2005) Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients—a systematic overview of the evidence. J Gen Intern Med 20:1019–1025
Wilkins K (1999) Health care consequences of falls for seniors. Health Rep 10(4):47–55
Cogan L, Martin AJ, Kelly LA, Duggan J, Hynes D, Power D (2010) An audit of hip fracture services in the Mater Hospital Dublin 2001 compared with 2006. Ir J Med Sci 179:51–55
Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. Br Med J 331:1374
Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM (1992) Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:861–866
Zuckerman JD (1996) Hip fracture. N Engl J Med 334:1519–1525
Vidan M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J (2005) Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1476–1482
Ribeiro TA, Premaor MO, Larangeira JA, Brito LG, Luft M, Guterres LW et al (2014) Predictors of hip fracture mortality at a general hospital in South Brazil: an unacceptable surgical delay. Clinics 69:253–258
Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, Friedman SM (2012) The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 3:129–134
Gerber Y, Melton LJ 3rd, McNallan SM, Jiang R, Weston SA, Roger VL (2013) Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular disease associations with hip fractures. Am J Med 126(2):169.e19–26
British Orthopaedic Association (2007) The care of patients with fragility fracture. http://www.fractures.com/pdf/BOA-BGS-Blue-Book.pdf
Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y (2008) Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth 55:146–154
Zuckerman JD (1996) Current concepts—hip fracture. N Engl J Med 334:1519–1525
Donegan DJ, Gay AN, Baldwin K, Morales EE, Esterhai JL Jr, Mehta S (2010) Use of medical comorbidities to predict complications after hip fracture surgery in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92A:807–813
Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications—study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243
Aharonoff GB, Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Zuckerman JD (1997) Hip fractures in the elderly: predictors of one year mortality. J Orthop Trauma 11:162–165
Paksima N, Koval KJ, Aharanoff G, Walsh M, Kubiak EN, Zuckerman JD et al (2008) Predictors of mortality after hip fracture: a 10-year prospective study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66:111–117
Michel JP, Klopfenstein C, Hoffmeyer P, Stern R, Grab B (2002) Hip fracture surgery: is the pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score a predictor of functional outcome? Aging Clin Exp Res 14:389–394
Radcliff TA, Henderson WG, Stoner TJ, Khuri SF, Dohm M, Hutt E (2008) Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90A:34–42
Zuckerman JD, Sakales SR, Fabian DR, Frankel VH (1992) Hip-fractures in geriatric patients—results of an interdisciplinary hospital care program. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:213–225
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Ailish Hannigan (Associate Professor of Biomedical Statistics at Graduate Entry Medical School University of Limerick) for her statistical advice and support. Author CY Henderson would like to acknowledge the summer student scholarship from Merck Sharpe and Dohme.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standards
Prior to the commencement of the study local ethical approval was received from the University Hospital Limerick’s Research Ethics Committee; this study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Data for this study was collected as an audit and no identifying patient factors were included.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, C.Y., Ryan, J.P. Predicting mortality following hip fracture: an analysis of comorbidities and complications. Ir J Med Sci 184, 667–671 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1271-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1271-z