Skip to main content
Log in

Defining Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: a Call for Standardization

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Some weight regain is expected after bariatric surgery; however, this concept is not well defined. A favorable weight loss response has commonly been defined as 50% excess weight loss (EWL). The medical literature uses %total weight loss (%TWL), which has recently been adopted in some surgical literature.

Objective

To demonstrate variability in bariatric surgery outcomes based on the definition applied and propose a standardized definition.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2001 to 2016 with ≥ 1 year follow-up was completed. Several previously proposed definitions of weight regain were analyzed.

Results

One thousand five hundred seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. Preoperative mean body mass index (BMI) was 47.6 ± 6.4 kg/m2. Increased preoperative BMI was associated with increased mean %TWL at 2 years postoperative (29.3 ± 9.1% for BMI < 40, vs. 37.5 ± 9.5% for BMI > 60; P < 0.001). Based on %EWL, 93% of patients experienced ≥ 50% EWL by 1–2 years, and 61.8% maintained ≥ 50% EWL through the 10-year follow-up period. Similarly, 97% experienced ≥ 20% TWL by 1–2 years and 70.3% maintained ≥ 20% TWL through the 10-year follow-up period. Over 50% of patients maintained their weight based on several proposed definitions through 5 years follow-up.

Conclusions

A high percentage (> 90%) of patients achieve ≥ 20% TWL and ≥ 50% EWL. Increased preoperative BMI was associated with increased %TWL and decreased %EWL at 2 years postoperative. The incidence of weight regain varies depending on the definition. We propose a standardized definition for identifying good responders following bariatric surgery to be ≥ 20% TWL, as this measure is least influenced by preoperative BMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sczepaniak JP, Owens ML, Shukla H, et al. Comparability of weight loss reporting after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy using BOLD data 2008-2011. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):788–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van de Laar A, de Caluwe L, Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):763–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Hollanda A, Ruiz T, Jiménez A, et al. Patterns of weight loss response following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(8):1519–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nedelcu M, Khwaja HA, Rogula TG. Weight regain after bariatric surgery—how should it be defined? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):1129–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seltzer CC. Some re-evaluations of the build and blood pressure study, 1959 as related to ponderal index, somatotype and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(5):254–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lager CJ, Esfandiari NH, Subauste AR, et al. Milestone weight loss goals (weight normalization and remission of obesity) after gastric bypass surgery: long-term results from the University of Michigan. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1659–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou YH, Ma XQ, Wu C, et al. Effect of anti-obesity drug on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aminian A, Jamal M, Augustin T, et al. Failed surgical weight loss does not necessarily mean failed metabolic effects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(10):682–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moyer VA. Screening for and management of obesity in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(5):373–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvajal R, Wadden TA, Tsai AG, et al. Managing obesity in primary care practice: a narrative review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1281:191–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the grant support provided by the Foundation for Surgical Fellowships for the Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery and Advanced Laparoscopy Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon T. Grover.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

A HIPAA waiver of authorization was approved by our institution’s IRB.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grover, B.T., Morell, M.C., Kothari, S.N. et al. Defining Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: a Call for Standardization. OBES SURG 29, 3493–3499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04022-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04022-z

Keywords

Navigation