Abstract
Background
The diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) usually requires an oral glucose tolerance test, but this procedure seems inappropriate after gastric bypass surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) due to specific altered glycemic responses. We aimed here at describing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profile of pregnant women after RYGB.
Methods
CGM was performed in 35 consecutive pregnant women after RYGB at 26.2 ± 5 weeks of gestation.
Results
After RYGB, pregnant women display high postprandial interstitial glucose (IG) peaks and low IG before and 2 h after meals. The postprandial IG peak is reached early, within 54 ± 9 min. The maximum IG values reach 205 mg/dl, and the percentage of time above 140 mg/dl (6.6 ± 7 %) is similar to what is described in GDM women.
Conclusions
This study is the first to describe CGM profile in pregnant women after RYGB. CGM features are similar to those of non-pregnant post-RYGB patients, characterized by wide and rapid changes in postprandial IG, and high exposure to hyperglycemia. The exposure to hyperglycemia is similar to what is reported in GDM although the time to postprandial peak is shorter. CGM could be an additional useful approach to screen for glucose intolerance during pregnancy after RYGB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wax JR, Cartin A, Wolff R, et al. Pregnancy following gastric bypass for morbid obesity: effect of surgery-to-conception interval on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1517–21.
Belogolovkin V, Salihu HM, Weldeselasse H, et al. Impact of prior bariatric surgery on maternal and fetal outcomes among obese and non-obese mothers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1211–8.
Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122:248–56.
International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.
Roslin MS, Dudiy Y, Brownlee A, et al. Response to glucose tolerance testing and solid high carbohydrate challenge: comparison between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, vertical sleeve gastrectomy, and duodenal switch. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:91–9.
Wittgrove AC, Jester L, Wittgrove P, et al. Pregnancy following gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1998;8:461–4.
Wax JR, Pinette MG, Cartin A, et al. Female reproductive issues following bariatric surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62:595–604.
ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 105, June 2009 – BariatricSurgery.pdf [Internet]. Available from http://mail.ny.acog.org/website/SMIPodcast/BariatricSurgery.pdf
Freitas C, Araújo C, Caldas R, et al. Effect of new criteria on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in women submitted to gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;S1550–7289.
O’sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes. 1964;13:278–85.
Kim SH, Liu TC, Abbasi F, et al. Plasma glucose and insulin regulation is abnormal following gastric bypass surgery with or without neuroglycopenia. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1550–6.
Goldfine AB, Mun EC, Devine E, et al. Patients with neuroglycopenia after gastric bypass surgery have exaggerated incretin and insulin secretory responses to a mixed meal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4678–85.
Hanaire H, Bertrand M, Guerci B, et al. High glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring after surgical treatment of obesity by gastric bypass. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:625–30.
Yogev Y, Ben–Haroush A, Chen R, et al. Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:949–53.
Bühling KJ, Kurzidim B, Wolf C, et al. Introductory experience with the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS; Medtronic Minimed) in detecting hyperglycemia by comparing the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in non-pregnant women and in pregnant women with impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2004;112:556–60.
Bühling KJ, Winkel T, Wolf C, et al. Optimal timing for postprandial glucose measurement in pregnant women with diabetes and a non-diabetic pregnant population evaluated by the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). J Perinat Med. 2005;33:125–31.
Siegmund T, Rad NT, Ritterath C, et al. Longitudinal changes in the continuous glucose profile measured by the CGMS in healthy pregnant women and determination of cut-off values. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139:46–52.
Harmon KA, Gerard L, Jensen DR, et al. Continuous glucose profiles in obese and normal-weight pregnant women on a controlled diet: metabolic determinants of fetal growth. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2198–204.
Mazze R, Yogev Y, Langer O. Measuring glucose exposure and variability using continuous glucose monitoring in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1171–5.
Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, et al. Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1660–8.
Chen R, Yogev Y, Ben–Haroush A, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:256–60.
Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Chen R, et al. The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:576–81.
Wittgrove C, Tremblay. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–7.
Halverson JD, Kramer J, Cave A, et al. Altered glucose tolerance, insulin response, and insulin sensitivity after massive weight reduction subsequent to gastric bypass. Surgery. 1982;92:235–40.
Vaurs C, Brun JF, Bérard E, et al. A beta-cell pancreatic dysfunction participates in the hyperglycemic peaks observed after gastric bypass surgery of obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;in Press.
Mazze RS, Strock E, Wesley D, et al. Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10:149–59.
Group JDRFCGMS, Fox LA, Beck RW, et al. Variation of interstitial glucose measurements assessed by continuous glucose monitors in healthy, nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1297–9.
Dalfrà MG, Sartore G, Di Cianni G, et al. Glucose variability in diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:853–9.
Herranz L, Pallardo LF, Hillman N, et al. Maternal third trimester hyperglycaemic excursions predict large-for-gestational-age infants in type 1 diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;75:42–6.
Taslimi MM, Navabi K, Acosta R, et al. Concealed maternal blood glucose excursions correlate with birth weight centile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:456–60.
Ceriello A, Ihnat MA. ‘Glycaemic variability’: a new therapeutic challenge in diabetes and the critical care setting. Diabet Med. 2010;27:862–7.
Kjær MM, Lauenborg J, Breum BM, et al. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after bariatric surgery: a nationwide register-based matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:464.e1–5.
Roos N, Neovius M, Cnattingius S, et al. Perinatal outcomes after bariatric surgery: nationwide population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6460.
Bennett WL, Gilson MM, Jamshidi R, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: retrospective analysis of insurance claims data. BMJ. 2010;340:c1662.
Acknowledgments
C. B., P. R., and H. H. researched data and wrote the manuscript. F. L. recruited patients, contributed to the data collection, and reviewed the manuscript. O. P. and P. G. contributed to the discussion and reviewed the manuscript. M. B. recruited patients and reviewed the manuscript. C.V. participated in the data collection and reviewed the manuscript. L. C. contributed to the statistical analysis. P. Ritz is the guarantor and takes responsibility for the contents of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Statement of Human Rights
The study has been approved by the local research ethical committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonis, C., Lorenzini, F., Bertrand, M. et al. Glucose Profiles in Pregnant Women After a Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 26, 2150–2155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2061-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2061-z