Skip to main content
Log in

Glucose Profiles in Pregnant Women After a Gastric Bypass

Findings from Continuous Glucose Monitoring

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) usually requires an oral glucose tolerance test, but this procedure seems inappropriate after gastric bypass surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) due to specific altered glycemic responses. We aimed here at describing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profile of pregnant women after RYGB.

Methods

CGM was performed in 35 consecutive pregnant women after RYGB at 26.2 ± 5 weeks of gestation.

Results

After RYGB, pregnant women display high postprandial interstitial glucose (IG) peaks and low IG before and 2 h after meals. The postprandial IG peak is reached early, within 54 ± 9 min. The maximum IG values reach 205 mg/dl, and the percentage of time above 140 mg/dl (6.6 ± 7 %) is similar to what is described in GDM women.

Conclusions

This study is the first to describe CGM profile in pregnant women after RYGB. CGM features are similar to those of non-pregnant post-RYGB patients, characterized by wide and rapid changes in postprandial IG, and high exposure to hyperglycemia. The exposure to hyperglycemia is similar to what is reported in GDM although the time to postprandial peak is shorter. CGM could be an additional useful approach to screen for glucose intolerance during pregnancy after RYGB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wax JR, Cartin A, Wolff R, et al. Pregnancy following gastric bypass for morbid obesity: effect of surgery-to-conception interval on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1517–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belogolovkin V, Salihu HM, Weldeselasse H, et al. Impact of prior bariatric surgery on maternal and fetal outcomes among obese and non-obese mothers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1211–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122:248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Roslin MS, Dudiy Y, Brownlee A, et al. Response to glucose tolerance testing and solid high carbohydrate challenge: comparison between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, vertical sleeve gastrectomy, and duodenal switch. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittgrove AC, Jester L, Wittgrove P, et al. Pregnancy following gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1998;8:461–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wax JR, Pinette MG, Cartin A, et al. Female reproductive issues following bariatric surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62:595–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 105, June 2009 – BariatricSurgery.pdf [Internet]. Available from http://mail.ny.acog.org/website/SMIPodcast/BariatricSurgery.pdf

  9. Freitas C, Araújo C, Caldas R, et al. Effect of new criteria on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in women submitted to gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;S1550–7289.

  10. O’sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes. 1964;13:278–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SH, Liu TC, Abbasi F, et al. Plasma glucose and insulin regulation is abnormal following gastric bypass surgery with or without neuroglycopenia. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1550–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldfine AB, Mun EC, Devine E, et al. Patients with neuroglycopenia after gastric bypass surgery have exaggerated incretin and insulin secretory responses to a mixed meal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4678–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanaire H, Bertrand M, Guerci B, et al. High glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring after surgical treatment of obesity by gastric bypass. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:625–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yogev Y, Ben–Haroush A, Chen R, et al. Diurnal glycemic profile in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:949–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bühling KJ, Kurzidim B, Wolf C, et al. Introductory experience with the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS; Medtronic Minimed) in detecting hyperglycemia by comparing the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in non-pregnant women and in pregnant women with impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2004;112:556–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bühling KJ, Winkel T, Wolf C, et al. Optimal timing for postprandial glucose measurement in pregnant women with diabetes and a non-diabetic pregnant population evaluated by the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). J Perinat Med. 2005;33:125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siegmund T, Rad NT, Ritterath C, et al. Longitudinal changes in the continuous glucose profile measured by the CGMS in healthy pregnant women and determination of cut-off values. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harmon KA, Gerard L, Jensen DR, et al. Continuous glucose profiles in obese and normal-weight pregnant women on a controlled diet: metabolic determinants of fetal growth. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2198–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazze R, Yogev Y, Langer O. Measuring glucose exposure and variability using continuous glucose monitoring in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1171–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, et al. Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1660–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen R, Yogev Y, Ben–Haroush A, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;14:256–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Chen R, et al. The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wittgrove C, Tremblay. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halverson JD, Kramer J, Cave A, et al. Altered glucose tolerance, insulin response, and insulin sensitivity after massive weight reduction subsequent to gastric bypass. Surgery. 1982;92:235–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaurs C, Brun JF, Bérard E, et al. A beta-cell pancreatic dysfunction participates in the hyperglycemic peaks observed after gastric bypass surgery of obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;in Press.

  26. Mazze RS, Strock E, Wesley D, et al. Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10:149–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Group JDRFCGMS, Fox LA, Beck RW, et al. Variation of interstitial glucose measurements assessed by continuous glucose monitors in healthy, nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1297–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalfrà MG, Sartore G, Di Cianni G, et al. Glucose variability in diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:853–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Herranz L, Pallardo LF, Hillman N, et al. Maternal third trimester hyperglycaemic excursions predict large-for-gestational-age infants in type 1 diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;75:42–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taslimi MM, Navabi K, Acosta R, et al. Concealed maternal blood glucose excursions correlate with birth weight centile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:456–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ceriello A, Ihnat MA. ‘Glycaemic variability’: a new therapeutic challenge in diabetes and the critical care setting. Diabet Med. 2010;27:862–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kjær MM, Lauenborg J, Breum BM, et al. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after bariatric surgery: a nationwide register-based matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:464.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roos N, Neovius M, Cnattingius S, et al. Perinatal outcomes after bariatric surgery: nationwide population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bennett WL, Gilson MM, Jamshidi R, et al. Impact of bariatric surgery on hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: retrospective analysis of insurance claims data. BMJ. 2010;340:c1662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

C. B., P. R., and H. H. researched data and wrote the manuscript. F. L. recruited patients, contributed to the data collection, and reviewed the manuscript. O. P. and P. G. contributed to the discussion and reviewed the manuscript. M. B. recruited patients and reviewed the manuscript. C.V. participated in the data collection and reviewed the manuscript. L. C. contributed to the statistical analysis. P. Ritz is the guarantor and takes responsibility for the contents of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hélène Hanaire.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human Rights

The study has been approved by the local research ethical committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonis, C., Lorenzini, F., Bertrand, M. et al. Glucose Profiles in Pregnant Women After a Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 26, 2150–2155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2061-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2061-z

Keywords

Navigation