Skip to main content
Log in

Obese Women’s Perception of Bariatric Trans-vaginal NOTES

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the discussion pertaining to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) focuses on technical issues, with little attention to women’s perception and to their willingness to consent to this surgery, especially in the field of obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate obese women’s perception of NOTES and trans-vaginal access. Sixty two obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery were given a written description of NOTES with an anonymous questionnaire exploring their concerns and opinions regarding this technique. The risk of complications was the most important aspect with regard to surgical procedures for 87.1% of patients, while the aesthetic result counted only for 16.1%; none of the patients would accept an increased risk of surgical complications for a better aesthetic result, and 74.2% of them would prefer a standardized traditional surgical approach. Nulliparous women were more concerned about the potentially negative effects of NOTES on fertility than multiparous women and younger women were more worried about the effects on sexual function than older women. 83.9% of patients refusing NOTES stated that the main reason for their refusal was the lack of definitive data on the beneficial effects. Bariatric NOTES potentially offers obese women a scarless intervention, but only a few obese women expressed worries about the cosmetic/aesthetic effects of surgery, while most of them were worried about effects on future fertility and sexual life. Our study highlights a strong need for early reporting of outcome data to enlighten patients about this new approach to bariatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, et al. Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:1243–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Willingham FF, Brugge WR. Taking NOTES: translumenal flexible endoscopy and endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:550–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangaranjan M, et al. Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES: world’s first report. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunting DM. Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2010;14:490–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos AC, Zundel N, Neto MG, et al. Human hybrid NOTES transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:660–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maddern GJ. NOTES: progress or marketing? ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:854–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson CI, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, et al. Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1170–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao A, Kynaston J, MacDonald ER, et al. Patient preferences for surgical techniques: should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3016–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, et al. Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Horgan S, Thompson K, Talamini M, et al. Clinical experience with a multifunctional, flexible surgery system for endolumenal, single-port, and NOTES procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:586–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Ng EK. Current developments in natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery: an evidence-based review. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4792–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khashab MA, Kalloo AN. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, et al. The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252:263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Targarona EM, Maldonado EM, Marzol JA, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: the transvaginal route moving forward from cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watrelot A, Nassif J, Law WS, et al. Safe and simplified endoscopic technique in transvaginal NOTES. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:e92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vix M, Dallemagne B, Coumaros D, et al. Transvaginal hybrid sleeve gastrectomy in a patient with a BMI of 40: live surgery during a NOTES course. E-publication: WeBSurg.com, May 2009; 9(5). URL: http://www.eats.fr/doi-vd01en2611.htm.

  18. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Rojas OA, et al. Hybrid vaginal MA-NOS sleeve gastrectomy: technical note on the procedure in a patient. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marchesini JC, Cardoso AR, Nora M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with NOTES visualization—a step toward NOTES procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:773–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer LJ, Jacobsen G, Wong B, et al. NOTES laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy in humans—description of preliminary experience in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:633–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, et al. Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1519–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Strickland AD, Norwood MGA, Behnia-Willison F, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a survey of women’s views on a new technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2424–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, et al. Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25:408–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

Stefano Rocchietto, Gitana Scozzari, Alberto Arezzo and Mario Morino have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Morino.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Questionnaire

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rocchietto, S., Scozzari, G., Arezzo, A. et al. Obese Women’s Perception of Bariatric Trans-vaginal NOTES. OBES SURG 22, 452–459 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0578-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0578-8

Keywords

Navigation