Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-Incision Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—a Randomised Pilot Study

  • New Concepts
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This is a prospective pilot study done to evaluate the feasibility and to assess the outcomes and complication rates of the single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus the conventional five-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods

A prospective comparative analysis was done of 50 patients in each arm who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and single-incision sleeve gastrectomy from September 2009 until April 2010. Both groups were matched for age, gender and BMI and were then randomly assigned to either group. Postoperative pain scoring was done using the visual analogue scale. Postoperative outcomes in terms of pain scores, excess weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and complication rates were compared in both groups, at the end of 6 months.

Results

Operating times in both groups were comparable with experience. Intraoperative blood loss was similar in both groups. VAS scoring revealed lesser postoperative pain after the first 8 h in the single-incision group as compared to the laparoscopy group—P < 0.0001. At 6 months, excess weight loss and resolution of comorbidities were comparable in both groups. There were no major complications or mortalities in either group.

Conclusions

Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a feasible surgical procedure for morbid obesity in selected individuals. When compared to conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, it has equally effective weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. It also has the added benefits of little or no visible scarring and reduced postoperative pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wheeless CR. A rapid, inexpensive, and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1969;3:65–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pelosi MA, Pelosi 3rd MA. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37(9):777–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(2):177–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(10):1013–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rane A, Rao P, Rao P. Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology. 2008;72(2):260–3. discussion 263–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. ObesSurg. 2008;18(11):1492–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, et al. Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. ObesSurg. 2008;18(10):1338–42.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Single laparoscopic incision transabdominal (SLIT) surgery-adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical approach. Obes Surg. 2008;18(12):1628–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saber A, El-Ghazaly TH, Minnick DB. Single port access transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the SILS port: first reported case. Surg Innov. 2009;16(4):343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH. Feasibility of single-access laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in super-super obese patients. Surg Innov. 2010;17(1):36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, Benavoli D, et al. Laparoscopic single-port sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: preliminary series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:65–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang C-K, Houng J-Y, Chiang C-J, et al. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a first case report. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1711–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multipurpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roa PE, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. ObesSurg. 2006;16:1323–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lakdawala MA, Bhasker A, Mulchandani D, et al. Comparison between the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the Indian population: a retrospective 1 year study. Obes Surg. 2010;20(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Muffazal Lakdawala, Aparna Bhasker, Nor Hisham Bin Muda and Sunita Goel have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Bhasker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakdawala, M.A., Muda, N.H., Goel, S. et al. Single-Incision Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—a Randomised Pilot Study. OBES SURG 21, 1664–1670 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y

Keywords

Navigation