Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assisted peritoneal dialysis as a method of choice for elderly with end-stage renal disease

  • Nephrology - review
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last two decades, most developed countries have seen a continuous growth in the number of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease commencing renal replacement therapy. Despite the many advantages that peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers to elderly patients with ESRD, it is still underutilized in older patients. Older patients are much more vulnerable to the problems associated with aging, which may affect their level of independence and their long-term prognosis. Those patients have physiological changes related to aging and common health problems such as anxiety, depression, dementia, visual impairment, and cognitive impairment, all of which interfere with self-performing PD. Assistance with home-care nurses and assistance by a family member may overcome this problem. Some old but also more recent literature data justifies the idea that assisted PD may significantly contribute to increase the overall number of elderly patients who can be treated with PD at home. With assisted PD, free choice can be offered to patients with high comorbidity index who cannot perform their peritoneal exchanges by themselves. Automated peritoneal dialysis is the ideal treatment modality for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease who require assistance since this limits home-care nurse visits to only two a day. As expected, the elderly have a higher mortality rate than younger patients treated by assisted PD, but technique failure rate, overall peritonitis rate, and most quality-of-life (QoL) measures are comparable with those of younger patients. Peritoneal dialysis in nursing homes offers treatment for elderly patients without family support. In this regard, automated PD or nightly PD keeps the patient’s daytime free for nursing home activities, increases socialization, and enables better rehabilitation that improves their QoL. Although withdrawal from dialysis is more frequent among nursing-home dialysis patients, this high discontinuation rate is not due to dialysis per se but rather to associated social and medical circumstances. Better communication between nursing staff and renal team is crucial for improving staff confidence and will contribute to higher utilization of PD in nursing homes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Renal Data System 2007 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease & End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States (2008) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, Bethesda, MD. ESRD Incidence & Prevalence AJKD 51(Suppl (1):S82–S98

  2. CORR (2006) Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) annual report: treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada, 1995 and 2004. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Don Mills, ON, Canada

  3. Ansell D, Feest T, Rao R, Williams A, Winearls C (2006) UK Renal Registry Report 2005. UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horl WH, de Alvaro F, Williams PF (1999) Healthcare system and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies—an international review: access to ESRD treatments. Nephrol Dial Transplant 4(Suppl 6):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frei U, Schober-Halstenberg H-J (2004) Quasi Niere: Nierenersatztherapie in Deutschland 2003/2004

  6. Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, Stengel B, Simpson K, Briggs JD, ERA-EDTA Registry Committee (2003) The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol 60:352–360

  7. McDonald SP, Russ GR, Kerr PG, Collins JF (2002) Australia and New Zealand DIALYSIS and transplant registry: ESRD in Australia and New Zealand at the end of the millennium: a report from the ANZDATA registry. Am J Kidney Dis 40:1122–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown EA (2005) Peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients: clinical experience. Perit Dial Int 25(Suppl 3):S88–S91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurella M, Covinsky KE, Collins AJ, Chertow GM (2007) Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States. An Intern Med 146:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  10. United States Renal Data System (2006) Annual report. USRDS Coordinating Center, Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW (2004) The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 43:891–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stel VS, van Dijk PC, van Manen JG et al (2005) Prevalence of co-morbidity in different European RRT population and its effect on access to renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20(12):2803–2811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendelssohn DC, Mullaneu SR, Jung B, Blake PG, Metha RL (2001) What do American nephrologist think about dialysis modality selection? Am J Kidney Dis 37:22–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jassal SV, Krishna G, Mallik NP, Mendelssohn DC (2002) Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists toward dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:474–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung B, Blake PG, Mehta RL, Mendelssohn DC (1999) Attitudes of Canadian nephrologist toward dialysis modality selection. Perit Dial Int 19:263–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Manns BJ, Taub K, Vanderstraeten C et al (2005) The impact of education according to kidney disease patients’ plans to initiate dialysis with self care dialysis: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 68:1777–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Venesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A (2005) Patient education and access for ESRD patients to renal replacement therapy beyond in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 68:378–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris SA, Lamping DL, Brown EA, Constantinovici N, North Thames Dialysis Study (NTDS) Group (2002) Clinical outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients on peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 22:463–470

    Google Scholar 

  19. Obraador GT, Ruthazer R, Arora P, Kausz AT, Pereira BJ (1999) Prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal care before initiation of dialysis in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1793–1800

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holley JL, Bernardini J, Perlmutter JA, Piraino B (1994) A comparison of infection rates among older and younger patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 14:66–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vecchi AF, Maccario M, Braga M, Scalamogna A, Castelnovo C, Ponticelli C (1998) Peritoneal dialysis in nondiabetic patients older than 70 years: comparison with patients aged 40–60 years. Am J Kidney Dis 31:479–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Ritherford P et al (2003) Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD outcome study. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:2948–2957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Joner MR, Gehr TW, Burkart JM et al (1998) Replacement of aminoacid and protein loses with 1.1% aminoacid peritoneal dialysis solution. Perit Dial Int 18:210–216

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jagose JT, Afthentopoulos IE, Shetty A, Oreopoulos DG (1996) Successful use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in octogenarians. Adv Perit Dial 12:126–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dimkovic N, Prakash S, Roscoe J et al (2001) Chronic peritoneal dialysis in octogenarians. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:2034–2040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bargman JM (1993) Complications of peritoneal dialysis related to increased intraabdominal pressure. Kidney Int 40(Suppl):S75–S80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gentile DE (1990) Peritoneal dialysis in geriatric patients: a survey of clinical practice. Adv Perit Dial 6(Suppl):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Fang W, Kothari J et al (2007) Clinical outcomes of elderly patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis: experiences from one center and a review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol 39:1295–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Salonen T, Reina T, Oksa H, Rissanen P, Pasternack A (2007) Alternative strategies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 39:289–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Covic A, Gusbeth-Tatomir P, Goldmith DJA (2006) The epidemics of cardiovascular disease in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease—two facet of the same problem. Int Urol Nephrol 38:371–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maitra S, Sekercioglu N, Baloch S, Cook WL, Jassal SV (2007) Causes of death in older peritoneal dialysis patients—can we depend on registry reports? Int Urol Nephrol 39:345–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P (2005) Assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) for functionally dependent and elderly patients. Perit Dial Int 25(Suppl 3):S60–S64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lamping DL, Constantinovici N, Roderick P et al (2000) Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and cost in the North Thames Dialysis Study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 356:1543–1550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Apostolou T (2007) Quality of life in the elderly patients on dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 39:679–683

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kadambi P, Troidle L, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO (2002) APD in the elderly. Semin Dial 15:430–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Li JSC (2004) Prevalence of cognitive impairment among elderly Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Hong Kong J Nephrol 6:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dimkovic N, Oreopoulos DG (2000) Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the elderly: a review. Perit Dial Int 20(3):276–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Faller B, Bénévent D (1990) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in patients over 75 years. Nephrologie 11(5):325–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Issad B, Benevent D, Allouache M et al (1996) 213 Elderly uremic patients over 75 years of age treated with long-term peritoneal dialysis: a French multicenter study. Perit Dial Int 16(Suppl 1):S414–S418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cogny-Van Weydevelt F, Bacquaert-Dufour K, Benevent D et al (1999) A cost effectiveness analysis of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis vs. self care in centre hemodialysis in France. Dial Transplant 28:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jagose JT, Afthentopoulos IE, Shetty A, Oreopoulos D (1996) Successful use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in octogenarians. Geriatr Nephrol Urol 5:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gokal R, Jabukowski C, King J et al (1987) Outcome in patients on CAPD and haemodialysis: 4 year analysis of a prospective multi centre study. Lancet 2:1105–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lobbedez T, Moldovan R, Lecame M, de Lignu BH, Haggan WE, Ryckelynck JP (2006) Assisted peritoneal dialysis. Experience in a French Renal Department. Perit Dial Int 26:671–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sunder S, Taskapan H, Jojoa J et al (2004) Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the tenth decade of life. Int Urol Nephrol 36(4):605–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Li PKT, Law MC, Chow KM et al (2007) Good patient and technique survival in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 27(S2):S196–S201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP, Kiss AJ, Lamping DL, Manns BJ (2007) Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 71:673–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kadambi P, Troidle L, Gorban-Brennan N (2002) APD in the elderly. Semin Dial 15(6):430–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ho-dac-Pannekeet MM (2006) PD in the elderly-a challenge for the (pre)dialysis team. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(Suppl 2):ii60–ii62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Centers for Disease Control And Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics: The National Nursing Home Survey: 1997 Summary. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, 1998

  50. Anderson JE, Kraus J, Sturgeon D (1993) Incidence, prevalence and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients placed in nursing homes. Am J Kidney Dis 21:619–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Anderson JE, Kraus J, Sturgeon D (1993) Incidence, prevalence and outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients placed in nursing homes. Am J Kidney Dis 21:619–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Anderson JE (1997) Ten year’s experience with CAPD in a nursing home setting. Perit Dial Int 17:255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Carey HB, Chorney W, Pherson K, Finkelstein FO, Kliger AS (2001) Continuous peritoneal dialysis and the extended care facility. Am J Kidney Dis 37:580–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang T, Izatt S, Dalglish C et al (2002) Peritoneal dialysis in then nursing home. Int Urol Nephrol 34(3):405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schleifer CR (1990) Peritoneal dialysis in nursing homes. In: Nisensson AR (ed) Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin Inc, Toronto, 6:86–91

  56. Neu S, Kjellstrand CM (1986) Stopping long-term dialysis: an empirical study of life-supporting treatment. N Engl J Med 314:14–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Jassal SV, Brissenden JE, Raisbeck A, Roscoe J (1988) Comparative cost-analysis of two different chronic care facilities for end-stage renal disease patients. Geriatr Nephrol Urol 8:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Oreopoulos DG, Coleman S, Doyle E (2007) Reversing the decreasing peritoneal dialysis (PD) trend in Ontario: a government initiative to increase PD use in Ontario to 30% by 2010. Perit Dial Int 27:489–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mendelssohn DC (2002) Reflections on the optimal dialysis modality distribution: a North American perspective. Nephrol News Issues 16:26–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Dimkovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimkovic, N., Oreopoulos, D.G. Assisted peritoneal dialysis as a method of choice for elderly with end-stage renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol 40, 1143–1150 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9427-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9427-7

Keywords

Navigation