Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multicentre observational study of the effectiveness, safety and economic impact of nivolumab on non-small-cell lung cancer in real clinical practice

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Immunotherapy has become a standard treatment for lung cancer; however, the high cost makes it necessary to assess health outcomes. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and economic cost of nivolumab in real-world clinical practice. Setting Fifteen regional and academic hospitals from Spain participated in this study. Methods This study was a retrospective, multicentre and observational study involving patients who experienced progression after first-line therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer and were treated with nivolumab between January 2016 and July 2017. Effectiveness and safety were evaluated by the oncologist, and the data from the electronic clinical records of the patients were collected by the research team. Economic cost was calculated using the cost of acquiring nivolumab for the public health system. Main outcome measures Effectiveness variables were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The safety variable was the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the cost per life-year gained (LYG) was the economic variable. Results A total of 221 patients were enrolled (83.7% men). The mean age was 64.5 years, and 84.6% of the patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score of 0–1. Squamous tumours accounted for 59.7% of the total, and 78.7% of the patients presented a time since platinum therapy (TPT) > 6 months. The mean nivolumab dose was 216 mg (SD 211), and the treatment duration was 7.0 months (95% CI 5.8–8.1). The median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.2–7.3), and OS was 9.7 months (95% CI 7.6–11.8). The median PFS and OS values were statistically significantly superior for patients with an ECOG score of 0–1 and for patients with a TPT > 6 months. The median OS was also statistically significantly superior for patients with non-squamous histology. Regarding safety, 71% of the patients presented AEs of any grade, and in 18.6%, the nivolumab treatment had to be delayed or discontinued. The cost of nivolumab per patient was €19,910.00 (SD 19,369), and the cost per LYG was €110,026.00 (€77,557.00–€231,171.00). Conclusions This study confirms that the efficacy and safety of nivolumab treatment in a real population are comparable to the results obtained in clinical trials. A greater clinical benefit of nivolumab therapy was observed in patients with an ECOG score of 0–1, a TPT > 6 months or non-squamous histology. Despite the benefit observed, the cost per LYG is above the threshold of efficiency established by public health institutes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart BW, Wild CP. World cancer report 2014. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. 2014. ISBN: 978-92-832-0443-5.

  2. Escuín JS. Lung cancer in Spain. Current epidemiology, survival and treatment. Arch Bronconeumol. 2009;45:341–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reck M, Popat S, Reinmuth N, Ruysscher DD, Kerr KM, Peters S. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):iii27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ver.1.2019). National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Washington. 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

  5. EMA/CHMP/215704/2016 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report OPDIVO International non-proprietary name: nivolumab. European Medicines Agency. 2016. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Assessment_Report_-_Variation/human/003985/WC500209378.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

  6. OPDIVO, INN-nivolumab—Annex I. Summary of product characteristics. European Medicines Agency. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/product-information/opdivo-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

  7. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WEE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R, Cufer T, Ekman S, Levra MG, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v1–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hospital costs. Analytical Accounting. Statistical Portal of the SNS. Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social. Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. 2018. http://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/CMBD/PESOS_COSTES_APR_GRD_V32_2016.xls. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

  11. Castañeda Macías I, Martínez-Brocal Ogayar I, Alegre del Rey EJ, Marín Gil R. Nivolumab for non-small cell lung cancer metastatic for squamous histology in pre-treated patients. Evaluation report for the pharmacotherapeutic guide of hospitals of Andalusia. Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria. 2016. http://gruposdetrabajo.sefh.es/genesis/genesis/Documents/Nivolumab_CPNMescamoso_GFTHA_11_2016.doc. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

  12. Garde-Noguera J, Martin-Martorell P, De-Julián M, Pérez-Altozano J, Salvador-Coloma C, García-Sanchez J, et al. Predictive and prognostic clinical and pathological factors of nivolumab efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Clin Trans Oncol. 2018;20:1072–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oya Y, Yoshida T, Kuroda H, Mikubo M, Kondo C, Shimizu J, et al. Predictive clinical parameters for the response of nivolumab in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:103117–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujimoto D, Yoshioka H, Kataoka Y, Morimoto T, Kim YH, Tomii K, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Lung Cancer. 2018;119:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Protocol for the therapeutic use of drugs in lung cancer. Oncology Clinical Permanent Committee. Comisión Central para la Optimización y Armonización Farmacoterapéutica. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. 2017. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/library/plantillas/externa.asp?pag=/contenidos/gestioncalidad/gasistencial/farmacia/protocolo/Protoc_uso_terapeut_farmacos_cancer_pulmon.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Francisco Marín Pozo.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merino Almazán, M., Duarte Pérez, J.M., Marín Pozo, J.F. et al. A multicentre observational study of the effectiveness, safety and economic impact of nivolumab on non-small-cell lung cancer in real clinical practice. Int J Clin Pharm 41, 272–279 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0772-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0772-z

Keywords

Navigation