Skip to main content
Log in

The Voluntary Facial Action Technique: A Method to Test the Facial Feedback Hypothesis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the facial feedback hypothesis, facial muscles do not only express emotions, they also have the ability to modulate subjective experiences of emotions and to initiate emotions. This study examined the voluntary facial action technique, where participants were instructed to react with the Zygomatic major muscle (smile) or the Corrugator supercilii muscle (frown) when exposed to different stimuli. The results demonstrate that the technique effectively induces facial feedback effects. Through use of this technique we further addressed three important areas of facial feedback and found, first, that facial feedback did not modulate the experience of positive and negative emotion evoking stimuli differently. Second, the modulating ability provided significant feedback effects, while the initiating ability did not. Third, an effect of feedback remained and could be detected even some time after the critical manipulation. It is concluded that the present technique can be used in the future study of facial feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelmann, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andréasson, P., & Dimberg, U. (2008). Emotional empathy and facial feedback. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R. (1980). Nonverbal behaviour and the theory of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 811–824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19, 643–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1986). Facial reactions to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli. Biological Psychology, 23, 153–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1990). Facial reactions to fear-relevant stimuli for subjects high and low in specific fear. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 65–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1997). Facial reactions: Rapidly evoked emotional responses. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (2010). The voluntary facial action technique yields comparable frowns and smiles (Manuscript in preparation).

  • Dimberg, U., Hansson, G., & Thunberg, M. (1998). Fear of snakes and facial reactions: A case of rapid emotional responding. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., & Karlsson, B. (1997). Facial reactions to different emotionally relevant stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flack, W. F., Laird, J. D., & Cavallaro, L. A. (1999). Separate and combined effects of facial expressions and bodily postures on emotional feelings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. G., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2005). Behavioral markers and recognizability of the smile of enjoyment. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.), What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) (2nd ed., pp. 217–238). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellhorn, E. (1964). Motion and emotion: The role of proprioception in the physiology and pathology of the emotions. Psychological Review, 71, 457–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hennenlotter, A., Dresel, C., Castrop, F., Ceballos Baumann, A. O., Wohlschläger, A. M., & Haslinger, B. (2009). The link between facial feedback and neural activity within central circuitries of emotion—New insights from Botulinum toxin–induced denervation of frown muscles. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 537–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. A., Chiao, K. W., Devine, P. G., Lorig, T. S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). The influence of facial feedback on race bias. Psychological Science, 17(3), 256–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1884). What is emotion? Mind, 19, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, L.-O., & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypothesis: Evidence, implications, and directions. Motivation and Emotion, 20, 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2, 52–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., Martin, F. F., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 1. In: The positive affects. New York: Springer.

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1980). Affect as amplification: Some modifications in theory. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience (pp. 141–164). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants to Ulf Dimberg from The Swedish Research Council and The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. We thank Monika Thunberg for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Dimberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimberg, U., Söderkvist, S. The Voluntary Facial Action Technique: A Method to Test the Facial Feedback Hypothesis. J Nonverbal Behav 35, 17–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0098-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-010-0098-6

Keywords

Navigation