Skip to main content
Log in

Patients’ Perceptions of Risky Developments During Psychotherapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on risks and unwanted effects is largely missing in psychotherapy. Using exploratory factor analysis six dimensions of personal therapy situation were identified in a preliminary study, three of them were associated with risky developments during the psychotherapeutic process: (1) (poor) quality of therapeutic relationship, (2) burden caused by psychotherapy, and (3) dependency/isolation. Based on the finding of this study an online survey was performed to examine these three dimensions. Aside from these three factors another variable was associated with risky therapy developments: the online questionnaire also asked for premature terminations of psychotherapy as a consequence of risky conditions for the therapeutic development. Risky conditions were found to be associated with the following variables: (1) the combination of female patient–male therapist, (2) the therapeutic orientation (particularly with the psychodynamic approaches) and (3) the duration of therapy. Fewer humanistic and systemic psychotherapies were found among the high risk-prone group of patients who were at risk in at least three of the four variables which were associated with risky developments. Differences in the findings of the study regarding the four therapeutic orientations stress the importance of an extensive differential indication and a cooperative partnership between patient and therapist, in order to facilitate a positive patient participation towards the choice of therapy method and subsequent successful participation throughout the course of treatment. Further studies should also focus on female patient and male therapist psychotherapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkham, M., Connell, J., Stiles, W., Miles, N., Margison, F., Evans, C., et al. (2006). Dose–effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 160–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (2010). Negative effects from psychological treatments: A perspective. The American Psychologist, 65, 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E. (1963). The effects of psychotherapy: Negative results revisited. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10, 244–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L. E., Malik, M., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T. M., Talebi, H., Noble, S., et al. (2004). Therapist variables. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield′s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 227–306). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, P. E., Holgersen, H., & Nielsen, G. H. (2010). What is a “good outcome” in psychotherapy? A qualitative exploration of former patient’s point of view. Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 285–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, I., & Lemme, R. (1992). Schulenspezifische Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Einstellung der Therapeuten zur Wirkung von Psychotherapie. Berlin: TU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T. A. (2010). Will you follow while they lead? Introducing a patient-led approach to low intensity CBT interventions. In J. Bennett-Levy (Ed.), Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions (pp. 331–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T. A., & Spratt, M. B. (2009). When is enough enough? Structuring the organisation of treatment to maximise patient choice and control. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2, 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. B., & Strupp, H. H. (1996). Cluster analysis of patient reported psychotherapy outcome. Psychological Research, 6, 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • BGB1.I. Datenschutzgesetz 2000. (Vol. 165/1999). http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1999_165_1/1999_165_1.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2012.

  • Elliott, R. (1991). University of Toledo: Investigating significant therapy events. In L. E. Beutler & M. Crago (Eds.), Psychotherapy research—an international review of programmatic studies (pp. 317–321). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fäh, M. (2002). Wenn Analyse krank macht. Methodenspezifische Nebenwirkungen psychoanalytischer Therapien. In M. Maertens & H. G. Petzold (Eds.), Therapieschäden: Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Psychotherapie. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M., & Fiegenbaum, W. (1994). Therapieerfolgsmessung in der psychotherapeutischen Praxis. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 23(4), 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohburg, I. (2001). Untersuchungen zum Schadensverständnis von Gesprächspsychotherapeut(inn)en. In M. Märtens & H. G. Petzold (Eds.), Therapieschäden: Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Psychotherapie. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (2005). (Wie) kann psychotherapie durch empirische Validierung wirksamer werden? Psychotherapeutenjournal, 1, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., et al. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 155–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, D. S., McCullough, L., Plucinski, A., & Krieger, K. (2010). Do we know when our clients get worse? An investigation of therapist’s ability to detect negative client change. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 25–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heins, M. J., Knoop, H., & Bleijenberg, G. (2011). Reply to “harms of cognitive behavior therapy designed to increase activity levels in chronic fatigue syndrome”. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80, 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heins, M. J., Knoop, H., Prins, J. B., Stulemeijer, M., van der Meer, J. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (2010). Possible detrimental effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79, 249–256. doi:10.1159/000315130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermer, M., & Röhrle, B. (2008). Therapeutische Beziehungen: Geschichte, Entwicklung und Befunde. In M. Hermer & B. Röhrle (Eds.), Handbuch der therapeutischen Beziehung (Vol. 1, pp. 15–108). Tübingen: DGVT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. L., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcomes. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield′s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 84–136). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. O. (2002). Unerwünschte und schädliche Wirkungen von Psychotherapie. In D. Mattke, Hertel, G., Büsing, S., Schreiber-Willnow, K. (Ed.), Störungsspezifische Konzepte und Behandlung in der Psychosomatik (vol. 15–32.). Frankfurt a.M: VAS.

  • Hoffmann, S. O., Rudolf, G., & Strauß, B. (2008). Unerwünschte und schädliche Wirkungen von Psychotherapie. Eine Übersicht mit dem Entwurf eines eigenen Modells. Psychotherapeut, 53, 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, F. (2002). Risiken und Nebenwirkungen verhaltenstherapeutischer Behandlung. In M. Märtens & H. G. Petzold (Eds.), Therapieschäden. Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Psychotherapie (pp. 89–109). Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.

  • Kim, D. M., Wampold, B. E., & Bolt, D. M. (2006). Therapist effects in psychotherapy: A random-effects modeling of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data. Psychotherapy Research, 16(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindlon, T. (2011). Harms of cognitive behavior therapy designed to increase activity levels in chronic fatigue syndrome: Questions remain. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80, 110–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, D. R., Castonguay, L., Boswell, J. F., Nordberg, S. S., & Hayes, J. A. (2011). Therapist effectiveness: Implications for accountability and patient care. Psychotherapie Research, 21(3), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (2004). Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

  • Lambert, M. J. (2010). Prevention of treatment failure: The use of measuring, monitoring, and feedback in clinical practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2002). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy and relationships at work (pp. 17–32). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. M., Butler, M., & Hill, C. (2006). What clients find helpful in psychotherapy: Developing principles for facilitating moment-to moment change. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, C. C., Notman, M. T., & McCarthy, M. K. (2005). Gender issues in psychotherapy. In Oxford textbook of psychotherapy (pp. 411–420). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Neises, M., & Barolin, G. S. (2009). Gender-spezifische Aspekte in der Psychotherapie. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 159(11–12), 281–287. doi:10.1007/s10354-009-0680-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, S. A., Strassle, C. G., Roback, H. B., & Binder, J. L. (2004). Negative treatment effects in dyadic psychotherapy: A focus on prevention and intervention strategies. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 34(4), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D. E., Ronnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield′s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 307–389). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, D. L. (2000). Aspects of client’s conscious control of the therapeutic process. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenmoser, M. (2002). Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede: Vernachlässigte Gender-Perspektive. Deutsches Ärzteblatt PP, 7, 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Barkham, M. B., Connell, J., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2008). Responsive regulation of treatment duration in routine practice in United Kingdom primary care settings: Replication in a larger sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 298–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Psychotherapieforschung: Grundlagen und Ergebnisse. In W. Senf, & M. Broda (Eds.), Praxis der Psychotherapie. Ein integratives Lehrbuch (pp. 760–781). Stuttgart: Thieme.

  • Strupp, H. H., Fox, R. E., & Lessler, K. (1969). Patients view their psychotherapy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H. H., Hadley, S. W., & Gomes-Schwartz, B. (1977). Psychotherapy for better or worse: An analysis of the problem of negative effects. Montvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Brown, G. S. (2005). Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: A naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 914–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welker, M., Werner, A., & Scholz, J. (2005). Online-Research. Markt- und Sozialforschung mit dem Internet. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag GmbH.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Leitner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leitner, A., Märtens, M., Koschier, A. et al. Patients’ Perceptions of Risky Developments During Psychotherapy. J Contemp Psychother 43, 95–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-012-9215-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-012-9215-7

Keywords

Navigation