Abstract
Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the recommended method for treatment of cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum. Thus very low anastomoses are necessary to preserve continence, and pouch reconstruction is favored. It is unclear whether the level of anastomosis is important for continence and quality of life in colonic J-pouch reconstruction. In this investigation all patients were included who underwent curative elective anterior continuity resection with colorectal or coloanal J-pouch reconstruction for primary rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and any signs of recurrence at the time of investigation. Evaluation of continence performance by Wexner and Holschneider questionnaire and quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 (EORTC) questionnaires was done 220 ± 38 days after closure of the protective Ileostomy, which was performed 106 ± 48 days after primary intervention. Fifty-two patients (79%) were analyzed. Colopouch rectal anastomosis was performed in eighteen cases and colopouch anal anastomosis in thirty-four cases. Fifty percent of the patients in both groups were continent for solid stool. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of incontinence for liquid stool, however. They took stool-regulating medicine more frequently and complained of fecal soiling and a restricted quality of life. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly lower score on the most important points of the QLQ-C30 (emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, and quality of life). The same applied to the QLQ-CR38 for body image and problems with defecation. The quality of life of patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis was still considered acceptable compared with reference data for the normal healthy population, however. Both continence and quality of life are substantially affected by the level of the anastomosis after colonic pouch reconstruction. This suggests preservation of a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible and performing a colopouch rectal anastomosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guillem JG, Cohen AM (1999) Current issues in colorectal cancer surgery. Semin Oncol 26:505–513
Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F (1991) What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 34:329–335
Di Matteo G, Mascagni D, Zeri KP, Torretta A, Di Matteo FM, Maturo A, Peparini N (2000) Evaluation of anal function after surgery for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 74:11–14
Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ (1992) Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:114–116
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:82–87
Bretagnol F, Troubat H, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Saric J, Rullier E (2004) Long-term functional results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:155–159
Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1998) Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41:740–746
Benoist S, Panis Y, Boleslawski E, Hautefeuille P, Valleur P (1997) Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 185:114–119
Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881
Harris GJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW (2001) Function of a colonic J pouch continues to improve with time. Br J Surg 88:1623–1627
Barrier A, Martel P, Gallot D, Dugue L, Sezeur A, Malafosse M (1999) Long-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 86:1176–1179
Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD, Cunningham C, Schlegel RD, Guiguet M, Parc R (1998) Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:817–822; discussion 822–813
Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 84:1449–1451
Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Nakajima A, Uchida T, Wakano T, Tokoro T, Kubo R, Shindo K (1998) Indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: determining the optimum level of anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:558–563
Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T, Inoue K, Matsuzaki T, Okuno K, Shiozaki H, Yasutomi M (2004) Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1578–1585
Montesani C, Pronio A, Santella S, Boschetto A, Aguzzi D, Pirozzi R, D’Amato A, Vestri A (2004) Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study. Hepatogastroenterology 51:718–721
Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1992) Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:1082–1086
Gosselink MP, Busschbach JJ, Dijkhuis CM, Stassen LP, Hop WC, Schouten WR (2006) Quality of life after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:15–22
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Holschneider AM (1983) Treatment and functional results of anorectal continence in children with imperforate anus. Acta Chir Belg 82:191–204
Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 35:238–247
Apolone G, Filiberti A, Cifani S, Ruggiata R, Mosconi P (1998) Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients. Ann Oncol 9:549–557
Hermanek P (1999) Impact of surgeon’s technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 42:559–562
Stocchi L, Wolff BG (2000) Operative techniques for radical surgery for rectal carcinoma: can surgeons improve outcomes? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 9:785–798; discussion 799–800
Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Okuno K, Matsuzaki T, Uchida T, Ishimaru E, Tokoro T, Yasutomi M, Shiozaki H (2006) Long-term functional outcome of colonic j-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Today 36:441–449
Schwarz R, Hinz A (2001) Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 37:1345–1351
Sailer M, Fuchs KH, Fein M, Thiede A (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 89:1108–1117
Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Holzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 238:203–213
Acknowledgments
We thank especially all patients who completed the questionnaires and showed us how important it was to them to support our study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otto, S., Kroesen, A.J., Hotz, H.G. et al. Effect of Anastomosis Level on Continence Performance and Quality of Life after Colonic J-pouch Reconstruction. Dig Dis Sci 53, 14–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9815-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9815-3