Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its association with reduced mortality: evidence for selection bias

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) refers to removal of the opposite uninvolved breast in women with unilateral breast cancer, and rates are increasing worldwide. In observational studies, CPM is often associated with reductions in breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality when compared to unilateral surgical treatment alone, but this may reflect selection of a healthier cohort for CPM (selection bias). To further explore this possibility, we examined the association between CPM and non-cancer mortality, an indicator of selection bias. We identified 449,178 adult women diagnosed with unilateral, primary American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I–III ductal or lobular breast cancer, utilizing the 1998–2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Of these, 5.8 % (n = 25,961) underwent CPM as their first course of treatment. We examined associations between CPM and breast cancer-specific, all-cause, and non-cancer mortality utilizing multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, AJCC stage, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and histologic grade of the tumor. Among all patients receiving CPM as first course of treatment, CPM was associated with lower breast cancer-specific [HR 0.84 (95 % CI 0.79–0.89)], all-cause [HR 0.83 (95 % CI 0.80–0.88)], and non-cancer [HR 0.71 (95 % CI 0.64–0.80)] 5-year hazard of death. Although our results are consistent with other observational studies showing associations between CPM and reductions in breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, we demonstrate an even stronger association between CPM and reduced non-cancer mortality. Thus, the reported associations between CPM and reductions in mortality might at least partly be attributable to selection bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurian AW, Lichtensztajn DY, Keegan TH, Nelson DO, Clarke CA, Gomez SL (2014) Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998-2011. JAMA 312(9):902–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA (2007) Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5203–5209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuburger J, Macneill F, Jeevan R, van der Meulen JH, Cromwell DA (2013) Trends in the use of bilateral mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ Open 3(8). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003179

  4. Musiello T, Bornhammar E, Saunders C (2013) Breast surgeons’ perceptions and attitudes towards contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. ANZ J Surg 83(7–8):527–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sim Y, Tan VK, Ho GH, Wong CY, Madhukumar P, Tan BK et al (2014) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in an Asian population: a single institution review. Breast 23(1):56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP (2010) Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007. Ann Surg Oncol 17(10):2554–2562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peralta EA, Ellenhorn JD, Wagman LD, Dagis A, Andersen JS, Chu DZ (2000) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg 180(6):439–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrinton LJ, Barlow WE, Yu O, Geiger AM, Elmore JG, Barton MB et al (2005) Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol 23(19):4275–4286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedrosian I, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2010) Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(6):401–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, Kasner MJ et al (2010) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a survival advantage in high-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(10):2702–2709

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brewster AM, Bedrosian I, Parker PA, Dong W, Peterson SK, Cantor SB et al (2012) Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status. Cancer 118(22):5637–5643

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans DG, Ingham SL, Baildam A, Ross GL, Lalloo F, Buchan I et al (2013) Contralateral mastectomy improves survival in women with BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(1):135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Ghadirian P, Lynch HT, Snyder C, Tung N et al (2014) Contralateral mastectomy and survival after breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: retrospective analysis. BMJ 348:g226

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 359(9302):248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Institute nc. surveillance epidemiology and end results program (2014) Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/. Accessed 29 April 2014

  16. Janschek E, Kandioler-Eckersberger D, Ludwig C, Kappel S, Wolf B, Taucher S et al (2001) Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 67(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Narod SA (2014) Bilateral breast cancers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(3):157–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lizarraga IM, Sugg SL, Weigel RJ, Scott-Conner CE (2013) Review of risk factors for the development of contralateral breast cancer. Am J Surg 206(5):704–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy JA, Milner TD, O’Donoghue JM (2013) Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 14(7):e262–e269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jatoi I, Benson JR, Liau SS, Chen Y, Cisco RM, Norton JA et al (2010) The role of surgery in cancer prevention. Curr Probl Surg 47(10):750–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M et al (2011) Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol 29(16):2158–2164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz SJ, Morrow M (2013) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: addressing peace of mind. JAMA 310(8):793–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jatoi I, Benson JR (2013) The case against routine preoperative breast MRI. Future Oncol 9(3):347–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G (2009) Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1597–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan SA (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: what do we know and what do our patients know? J Clin Oncol 29(16):2132–2135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jatoi I, Benson JR (2014) Novel approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Future Oncol 10(4):515–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2012) False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol 120(4):920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sackett DL (1979) Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 32(1–2):51–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, Normand SL, Streiner DL, Austin PC et al (2005) Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ 330(7497):960–962

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Parsons is supported by grant K07CA175063 from the U.S. National Cancer Institute.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Jatoi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jatoi, I., Parsons, H.M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its association with reduced mortality: evidence for selection bias. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148, 389–396 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3160-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3160-y

Keywords

Navigation