Skip to main content
Log in

Simple cardiovagal and adrenergic function tests in carotid artery stenosis patients as a potential tool for determining a transient autonomic dysfunction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The arterial baroreflex depends on the integrity of the afferent limb, which can be quantified using the baroreceptor’s sensitivity (BRS) during the Valsalva maneuver (VM). The aim of this study was to evaluate, using autonomic nervous system tests, the autonomic function in patients after a carotid artery angioplasty (CAS).

Methods

We evaluated the changes in blood pressure (BP) during the VM (Valsalva ratio, BRS, sympathetic indexes) in 41 patients with symptomatic, unilateral, internal carotid artery stenosis.

Results

The Valsalva ratio between the baseline and the post-procedural day (1.3 ± 0.1 vs 1.44 ± 0.3; P = 0.002) and the post-procedural day and a month later (1.44 ± 0.3 vs 1.3 ± 0.3; P = 0.0002) revealed significant differences. This was confirmed with a cardiovagal BRS test. However, the adrenergic BRS did not reveal any differences. Sympathetic indexes [BP fall (SI1) and recovery during phase 2 (SI2)] showed differences for the periods before and a day after the treatment (36.9 ± 18.0 vs 27.2 ± 21.4 and 7.1 ± 13.1 vs 3.0 ± 8.2, respectively; P = 0.004) and for SI1 a day and a month after the treatment (27.2 ± 21.4 vs 37.1 ± 21.8; P = 0.036). The dynamic ranges between S1 and S3 (the difference in the BP between the baseline and the end of phase 2) were also different (P = 0.007 and P = 0.044, respectively).

Conclusion

We found heterogeneous responses in the BP regulation obtained with the Valsalva maneuver in our patients; however, we could not confirm that CAS provoked any long-term autonomic dysfunction, except for 1 day after the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roffi M, Sievert H, Gray WA et al (2010) Carotid artery stenting versus surgery: adequate comparisons? Lancet Neurol 9:339–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11–23

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coutts SB, Hill MD, Hu WY (2003) Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery 53:1053–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karapanayiotides T, Meuli R, Devuyst G et al (2005) Postcarotid endarterectomy hyperperfusion or reperfusion syndrome. Stroke 36:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouri S, Thapar A, Shalhoub J et al (2011) Hypertension and the post-carotid endarterectomy cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:229–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Mook WN, Rennenberg RJ, Schurink GW et al (2005) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Lancet Neurol 4:877–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Canovas D, Estela J, Perendreu J et al (2012) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after angioplasty. In: Forbes T (ed) Angioplasty, various techniques and challenges in treatment of congenital and acquired vascular stenoses. InTech, Rijeka, pp 9–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogasawara K, Mikami C, Inoue T, Ogawa A (2004) Delayed cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome caused by prolonged impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation after carotid endarterectomy: case report. Neurosurgery 54:1258–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn SS, Marcus DR, Moore WS (1989) Post-carotid endarterectomy hypertension: association with elevated cranial norepinephrine. J Vasc Surg 9:351–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Timmers HJ, Wieling W, Karemaker JM, Lenders JW (2004) Baroreflex failure: a neglected type of secondary hypertension. Neth J Med 62:151–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cayne NS, Faries PL, Trocciola SM et al (2005) Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 41:956–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benarroch EE, Opfer-Gehrking TL, Low PA (1991) Use of the photoplethysmographic technique to analyze the Valsalva maneuver in normal man. Muscle Nerve 14:1165–1172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Denq J-C, O’Brien PC, Low PA (1998) Normative data on phases of Valsalva maneuver. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Reutern GM, Goertler MW, Bornstein NM et al (2012) Recommendations for grading carotid stenosis by means of ultrasonic methods. Stroke 43:916–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton WF, Woodbury RA, Harper HT Jr (1936) Physiologic relationships between intrathoracic, intraspinal and arterial pressures. JAMA 107:853–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LeWinter MM (2001) Normal physiology of the cardiovascular system. In: Fuster V, Alexander W, Wellens GJJ (eds) Hurst’s the heart, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill, Maidenheach, pp 63–94

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kjeldsen S, Feldman RD, Lisheng L et al (2014) Updated national and international hypertension guidelines: a review of current recommendations. Drugs 74:2033–2051

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Low PA, Tomalia VA, Park KJ (2013) Autonomic function: some clinical applications. J Clin Neurol 9:1–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrezenmaier C, Singer W, Muenter Swift N, Sletten D, Tanabe J, Low PA (2007) Adrenergic and vagal baroreflex sensitivity in autonomic failure. Arch Neurol 64:381–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogel ER, Sandroni P, Low PA (2005) Blood pressure recovery from Valsalva maneuver in patients with autonomic failure. Neurology 65:1533–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson PB, DiRienzo M, Castiglioni P et al (2001) Time versus frequency domain techniques for assessing baroreflex sensitivity. J Hypertens 19:1699–1705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Novak P (2011) Assessment of sympathetic index from Valsalva maneuver. Neurology 76:2010–2016

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weston PJ, James MA, Panerai R et al (1996) Abnormal baroreceptor-cardiac reflex sensitivity is not detected by conventional tests of autonomic function in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci (London) 91:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pitzalis MV, Mastropasqua F, Passantino A et al (1998) Comparison between noninvasive indices of baroreceptor sensitivity and the phenylephrine method in postmyocardial infarction patients. Circulation 97:1362–1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pickering TG, Gribbin B, Sleight P (1972) Comparison of the reflex heart rate response to rising and falling arterial pressure in man. Cardiovasc Res 6:277–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Milic M, Sun P, Liu F et al (2009) A comparison of pharmacologic and spontaneous baroreflex methods in aging and hypertension. J Hypertens 27:1243–1251

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yakhou L, Constant I, Merle JC, Laude D, Becquemin JP, Duvaldestin P (2006) Noninvasive investigation of autonomic activity after carotid stenting or carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 44:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang C-C, Wu Y-S, Chen T et al (2010) Long-term effects of baroreflex function after stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Auton Neurosci 158:100–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bishop VS, Haywood JR, Shade RE, Siegel M, Hamm C (1986) Aortic baroreceptor deafferentation in the baboon. J Appl Physiol 60:798–801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shade RE, Bishop VS, Haywood JR, Hamm CK (1990) Cardiovascular and neuroendocrine responses to baroreceptor denervation in baboons. Am J Physiol 258:R930–R938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Timmers HJ, Karemaker JM, Wieling W, Buskens FG, Lenders JW (2001) Arterial barroreflex function after unilateral carotid endarterectomy. Clin Auton Res 11:188–189

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mangin L, Medigue C, Merle JC et al (2003) Cardiac autonomic control during balloon carotid angioplasty and stenting. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 81:944–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gianaros PH, Jennings JR, Olafsson GB et al (2002) Greater intima-media thickness in the carotid bulb is associated with reduced baroreflex sensitivity. Am J Hypertens 15:486–491

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lábrová R, Honzíková N, Maděrová E et al (2005) Age-dependent relationship between the carotid intima-media thickness, baroreflex sensitivity, and the inter-beat interval in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Physiol Res 54:593–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fisher JP, Kim A, Young CN et al (2009) Influence of ageing on carotid baroreflex peak response latency in humans. J Physiol 587(22):5427–5439

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Slovenian Research Agency under Grant P2-0095.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Švigelj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Švigelj, V., Šinkovec, M., Avbelj, V. et al. Simple cardiovagal and adrenergic function tests in carotid artery stenosis patients as a potential tool for determining a transient autonomic dysfunction. Clin Auton Res 25, 383–390 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-015-0316-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-015-0316-8

Keywords

Navigation