Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sphincter-preserving approaches to treat anal fistula do not jeopardize continence; however, healing rates are suboptimal. In this context, ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) can be considered promising offering high success rates and a relatively simple procedure. This review aimed to investigate the outcomes of LIFT to treat anal fistula. We conducted a systematic review of the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, to retrieve all relevant scientific original articles and scientific abstracts (Web of Science) related to the LIFT procedure for anal fistula between January 2007 and March 2013. The search yielded 24 original articles including 1,110 patients; these included one randomized controlled study, three case control studies, and 20 case series. Most studies included patients with trans-sphincteric or complex fistula, not amenable to fistulotomy. During a pooled mean 10.3 months of follow-up, the mean success, incontinence, intraoperative, and postoperative complication rates were 76.4, 0, 0, and 5.5 %, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed that the impact on success in terms of follow-up duration, study size, and combining other procedures was limited. There was no association between pre-LIFT drainage seton and success of LIFT. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract appears to be an effective and safe treatment for trans-sphincteric or complex anal fistula. Combining other procedures and a pre-LIFT drainage seton does not seem to confer any added benefit in terms of success. However, given the lack of prospective randomized trials, interpretation of these data must be cautious. Further trials are mandatory to identify predictive factors for success, and true effectiveness of the LIFT compared to other sphincter-preserving procedures to treat anal fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL et al (2011) Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1465–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seow-Choen F, Nicholls RJ (1992) Anal fistula. Br J Surg 79:197–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams JG, MacLeod CA, Rothenberger DA et al (1991) Seton treatment of high anal fistulae. Br J Surg 78:1159–1161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg P, Song J, Bhatia A et al (2010) The efficacy of anal fistula plug in fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12:965–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleier JI, Moloo H, Goldberg SM (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 53:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C et al (2007) Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai 90:581–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallin UG, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD et al (2012) Does ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract raise the bar in fistula surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1173–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann JP, Graf W (2013) Efficacy of LIFT for recurrent anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 15:592–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jhon, Young M, Taek JJ et al (2013) LIFT technique applied to patients undergoing complex transformation of the mid-term grades—including tuberculosis complex fistula KSCP 2013 annual meeting

  13. Alfred K, Roslani A, Chittawatanarat Tsang C, Koh D (2008) Short-term outcomes of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure for treatment of fistula-in-ano: a single institution experience in Singapore. Dis Colon Rectum 51:696–697

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Onkelen RS, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR (2012) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in low transsphincteric fistula: a new technique to avoid fistulotomy. Colorectal Dis 15:587–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis CN (2012) Outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic grafts to reinforce the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (BioLIFT procedure) for the management of complex anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1361–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang I, Boushey R, Moloo H (2013) Is it time to pull the plug on the plug? Outcomes of the LIFT, BioLIFT and plug for complex anal fistulas. Dis Colon Recctum 56:e148

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Han J, Yi B, Zheng Y, Cui J, Yang X (2012) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract plus bioprosthetic anal fistula plug for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 55:e145

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aboulian A, Kaji AH, Kumar RR (2011) Early result of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 54:289–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q, Chong H, Wexner S, Hong K, Maron D, da Silva G (2013) Seton placement prior to lift: does it affect the outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 56:e146

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8:336–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wells GA SB OCD (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis. The Ottawa Health Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

  22. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, Dekker E et al (2011) Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy 43:941–949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mushaya C, Bartlett L, Schulze B et al (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract compared with advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulas requiring initial seton drainage. Am J Surg 204:283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KK, Alsuwaigh R, Tan AM et al (2012) To LIFT or to flap? Which surgery to perform following seton insertion for high anal fistula? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1273–7127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Angelucci GP et al (2011) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: early results from a prospective observational study. Tech Coloproctol 15:413–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan I, Tsang C, Tan K et al (2011) The anatomy of failures following the ligation of intersphincteric tract (lift) technique for anal fistula: a review of 93 patients over 4 years. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1368–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abcarian AM, Estrada JJ, Park J et al (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: early results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 55:778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ooi K, Skinner I, Croxford M et al (2012) Managing fistula-in-ano with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure: the Western Hospital experience. Colorectal Dis 14:599–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu WY, Aboulian A, Kaji AH et al (2013) Long-term results of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 56:343–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh N, Butler B, Barrios G, Visco J, Attuwaybi B (2013) Review of anal fistula repair with LIFT procedure: single center experience. Dis Colon Rectum 54:E69

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma A, Chinn B, Eisenstat T et al (2013) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: early experience of an institution. Dis Colon Rectum 56:e151

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khomvilai S, Rojanasakul A (2012) Three-year experience of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 55:e149

    Google Scholar 

  34. Einarsdottir H, Beck D, Bohl J et al (2011) Single-center experience of the LIFT procedure (ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract). Dis Colon Rectum 54:e73

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sangwan YP, Rosen L, Riether RD et al (1994) Is simple fistula-in-ano simple? Dis Colon Rectum 37:885–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel JW (1999) Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1419–1422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O et al (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1616–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ortiz H, Marzo J (2000) Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 87:1680–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Wexner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, K.D., Kang, S., Kalaskar, S. et al. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 18, 685–691 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1183-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1183-3

Keywords

Navigation