Abstract
Background
When restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is performed, a temporary diverting loop ileostomy is often fashioned and usually closed 2–3 months later. Pouchography is used to assess pouch integrity, although its benefits have been questioned and no definitive data support its routine use. Our aim was to assess the utility of pouchography before ileostomy closure in patients with a negative clinical examination.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our database of patients who underwent ileostomy takedown between 1987 and 2010. Two hundred and thirty-two patients were identified who underwent RPC with a W- or J-pouch for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Twenty-one patients underwent RPC without diversion. Twenty-four symptomatic patients were excluded from the study. Only asymptomatic patients with a normal clinical examination were enrolled. One patient was lost at follow-up. Hence, 186 patients were considered suitable for evaluation. Patients undergoing ileostomy closure without any radiological examination were assigned to Group A (n = 132); those operated on after a preoperative pouchography to Group B (n = 54).
Results
Pouchography was normal in 49 (90.7 %) Group B patients. None of the 5 (9.3 %) Group B patients with an abnormal radiographic examination experienced complications. Negative pouchography did not exclude future problems. Patients of both groups experienced similar early functional impairments. Failure occurred in 3 (2.3 %) Group A patients and in 2 (3.7 %) patients of the pouchography group.
Conclusions
Pouchography may be safely omitted before ileostomy takedown if there is no clinical or endoscopic evidence of pelvic sepsis or ileo–anal anastomotic complications, even in very young patients, provided clinical and endoscopic follow-up is carefully performed. All anomalies detected were already suspected clinically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parks AG, Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P (1980) Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 67:533–538
Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S (2010) Ileal pouch dysfunction. Tech Coloproctol 14:S83–S85
Breen EM, Schoetz DJ, Marcello PW et al (1998) Functional results after perineal complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:691–695
Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Limongelli P et al (2010) The effect of pelvic septic complications on function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single center experience. Am Surg 76:428–435
Kelly IMG, Bartram CL, Nicholls RJ (1994) Water-soluble contrast pouchography—technique and findings in 85 patients. Clin Radiol 49:612–616
Dolinsky D, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Rombeau JL (2007) Utility of contrast enema for detecting anastomotic strictures after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:25–29
Tsao JI, Galandiuk S, Pemberton JH (1992) Pouchogram: predictor of clinical outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 35:547–551
Thoeni RF, Fell SC, Engelstad B, Schrock TB (1990) Ileoanal pouches: comparison of CT, scintigraphy, and contrast enemas for diagnosing postsurgical complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:73–78
Crema MD, Richarme D, Azizi L, Hoeffel CC, Tubiana JM, Arrivé L (2006) Pouchography, CT and MRI features of ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W594–W603
Lawal TA, Falcone RA, von Allmen D et al (2011) The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 46:1222–1225
da Silva GM, Wexner SD, Gurland B et al (2004) Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary? Colorectal Dis 6:117–120
Kalady MF, Mantyh CR, Petrofsky J, Ludwig KA (2008) Routine contrast imaging in low pelvic anastomosis prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy: is it necessary? J Gastrointest Surg 12:1227–1231
Nicholls RJ, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ (1993) Restorative proctocolectomy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
Parks A, Nicholls RJ (1978) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 2:85–88
Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CI (1983) Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 26:365–368
Pescatori M (1988) A modified three-loop ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 31:823–824
Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M et al (1980) Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 23:459–466
Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME (1985) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72:470–474
Malcom PN, Bagat KK, Chapman MAS, Davies SG, Williams NS, Murfitt JB (1995) Complications of the ileal pouch: is the pouchogram a useful predictor? Clin Radiol 50:613–617
Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J (2003) Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 238:229–234
Akbari RP, Madoff RD, Parker SC et al (2009) Anastomotic sinuses after ileoanal pouch construction: incidence, management, and outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 52:452–455
Nyam DC, Wolff BG, Dozois RG, Pemberton JH, Mathison SM (1997) Does the presence of a pre-ileostomy closure asymptomatic pouch-anastomotic sinus tract affect the success of ileal pouch-anastomosis? J Gastroint Surg 1:274–277
Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Larson DR, Crownhart BS, Dozois RR (2004) The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 240:615–621
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selvaggi, F., Pellino, G., Canonico, S. et al. Is omitting pouchography before ileostomy takedown safe after negative clinical examination in asymptomatic patients with pelvic ileal pouch? An observational study. Tech Coloproctol 16, 415–420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0838-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0838-1