Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life following surgery for recurrent fistula-in-ano

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The management of fistula-in-ano remains a major surgical challenge and carries a significant morbidity affecting the quality of life (QOL) due to the disease and repeated operations. The aim of the study was to assess the QOL before and after successful surgical treatment of recurrent fistula-in-ano using the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) which is a validated instrument consisting of 36 questions for measuring quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal disorders including fistula-in-ano.

Methods

All patients who underwent successful surgical treatment for recurrent fistula-in-ano over a period of 12 months were prospectively analysed using the GIQLI preoperatively and after a minimum of 18 months (mean, 24; range, 18–30) after complete cure following surgery. The difference in the QOL scores were analysed using Wilcoxon rank test.

Results

In the 21 patients recruited for the study there was a significant (P < 0.01) difference between the average preoperative (97.02) and postoperative (116.14) GIQLI scores. Of all the areas assessed by the GIQLI questionnaire, greater statistical significance was seen in areas of emotions (P < 0.01), social integration (P < 0.01) and effects of treatment (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Recurrent fistula-in-ano significantly affects the patients’ QOL, and also, successful surgery results in significantly improved long-term QOL. This improvement shows the need for those patients with fistula-in-ano to be subjected to further surgery despite the possible risk of anal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Toyonaga T, Tanaka Y, Song JF et al (2008) Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 12:217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinübing H Jr, Jannini JF, Campos AC, Pinho M, Ferreira LC (2007) The role of transperineal ultrasonography in the assessment of the internal opening of cryptogenic anal fistula. Tech Coloproctol 11:327–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG (2006) Long-term outcome following fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:784–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong S, Solomon M, Crowe P, Ooi K (2008) Cure, continence and quality of life after treatment for fistula-in-ano. ANZ J Surg 78:675–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Damon H, Guye O, Seigneurin A, Long F, Sonko A, Faucheron JL (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Aguilar J, Davey CS, Le CT, Lowry AC, Rothenberger DA (2000) Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1206–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, Fuchs KH, Thiede A (1998) Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 85:1716–1719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1985) Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 28:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Kiriu T, Sogawa N, Kanyama H, Matsumura N (2007) Factors affecting continence after fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula-in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang D, Yamana T, Iwadare J (2002) Long-term results and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with trans-sphincteric fistulas after muscle-filling procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1011–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Kynsey Road, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka

    Sanjeewa A. Seneviratne, Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera & Wajantha Kotalawala

Authors
  1. Sanjeewa A. Seneviratne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wajantha Kotalawala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seneviratne, S.A., Samarasekera, D.N. & Kotalawala, W. Quality of life following surgery for recurrent fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 13, 215–217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0517-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0517-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation