Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of patients with chronic mesh infection following abdominal wall hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mesh infection following incisional hernia repair has been reported at around 6–10 %. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of patients following treatment for chronically infected mesh after repair of an abdominal wall hernia.

Methods

Data were gathered on all patients with chronically infected mesh following failed conservative management treated under the care of one surgeon between January 2004 and December 2010. This included patient demographics, reason for first operation, number of previous operations and the number of previous hernia repairs. In addition, the type of mesh removed was recorded as was the organism cultured from the wound. Patients were followed up in a clinic at 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after surgery.

Results

15 patients had 18 operations under general anaesthesia for infected mesh (10 partial and 8 complete mesh excisions). The interval between the last mesh implantation or abdominal operation and re-operation for infection was a median of 17 months (range 7–49 months). All patients who had complete mesh removal had complete healing of their wound at 3 months compared with four in the partial excision group (P = 0.011). At a median follow-up of 19 months, only five in the complete and three in the partial excision group had complete wound healing (P = 0.184).

Conclusion

The outcome of patients treated for chronic mesh infection is unsatisfactory with high risk of recurrent herniation and development of further chronic abdominal wall sepsis; therefore, every effort should be made to prevent this problem in the first instance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T, Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Ijzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen S, Henke G, Freitag M, Faulhaber A, Ludwig K (2001) Deep prosthesis infection in incisional hernia repair: predictive factors and clinical outcome. Eur J Surg 167:453–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobb WS, Harris JB, Lokey JS, McGill ES, Klove KL (2003) Incisional herniorrhaphy with intraperitoneal composite mesh: a report of 95 cases. Am Surg 69:784–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Kalbaugh CL, Jones Y, Lokey JS (2009) Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh. Am Surg 75:762–767 (discussion 7–8)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC (2010) Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 210:648–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meagher H, Clarke Moloney M, Grace PA (2013) Conservative management of mesh-site infection in hernia repair surgery: a case series. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1069-8

  8. Sabbagh C, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, Browet F, Garriot B, Regimbeau JM (2012) Partial removal of infected parietal meshes is a safe procedure. Hernia 16:445–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B, Gruenbeck M, Bachleitner-Hofmann B, Mittlboeck M, Bergmann M (2010) Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg 34:1702–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Vick CC, Hawn MT (2011) Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212:496–502 (discussion 502–4)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown RH, Subramanian A, Hwang CS, Chang S, Awad SS (2013) Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 205:182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah BC, Tiwari MM, Goede MR, Eichler MJ, Hollins RR, McBride CL, Thompson JS, Oleynikov D (2011) Not all biologics are equal! Hernia 15:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2010) In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes. Ann Surg 251:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harth KC, Rosen MJ, Thatiparti TR, Jacobs MR, Halaweish I, Bajaksouzian S, Furlan J, von Recum HA (2010) Antibiotic-releasing mesh coating to reduce prosthetic sepsis: an in vivo study. J Surg Res 163:337–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. O’Dwyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, L., Tse, G.H. & O’Dwyer, P.J. Outcome of patients with chronic mesh infection following abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 18, 701–704 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1277-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1277-x

Keywords

Navigation