Skip to main content
Log in

Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcome after laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy (LIVH) for fascial defect larger or equal than 15 cm in width with the outcome after LIVH in patients with hernia defect smaller than 15 cm.

Methods

From 2003 through 2010, 350 patients were submitted to LIVH. In 70 cases, hernia defect was ≥15 cm in width and in 280 was <15 cm. Incisional hernias were often recurrent, double or multiorificial. In the group of larger hernias, the rate of obesity, recurrent hernia and multiorificial hernia was 27.1, 24.2 and 12.8 %, respectively, and in the group of smaller hernias 27.3, 16.1 and 2.8 %, respectively. Patients were interviewed using McGill pain score test to measure postoperative quality of life (QoL) in the mid-term.

Results

LIVH for hernia ≥15 cm required longer surgical time (p = 0.034) and postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Besides, there were higher rate of postoperative prolonged ileus (p = 0.035) and polmonitis (p = 0.001). Overall recurrence rate was 2.6, 8.6 % for larger and 1.1 % for smaller incisional hernias, p = 0.045. Mc Gill pain test revealed no significant difference in the two groups of patients in postoperative QoL within 36 months.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic approach seems safe and effective even to repair large incisional hernia, the rate of recurrence was higher, but acceptable, if compared to smaller hernias. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of incisional hernias ≥15 cm managed by laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Melzack R (1975) The MCGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1(3):277–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ujiki MB, Weinberger J, Varghese TK et al (2004) One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg 188:593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS et al (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ammaturo C, Bassi G (2005) The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias. Hernia 9(4):316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ammaturo C, Bassi UA, Bassi G (2010) Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases. Updates Surg 62:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:534–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernard C, Polliand C, Mutelica L et al (2007) Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia 11:315–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong WMY, Hope W, Overby DW et al (2011) Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation. Ann Plast Surg 66:551–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrari GC, Miranda A, Sansonna F et al (2008) Laparoscopic management of incisional hernias ≥15 cm in diameter. Hernia 12:571–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LeBlanc KA (2007) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: Are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature. Surg Endosc 21:508–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudmik LR, Schieman C, Dixon E et al (2006) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia 10:110–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baccari P, Nifosi J, Ghirardelli L et al (2009) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair without sutures: a single-center experience with 200 cases. JLAST 19(2):175–179

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D et al (2011) Long-term follow-up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. World J Surg 35:297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreno-Egea A, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Aguayo-Albasini JL (2012) Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study. Am J Surg 203(1):87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Baccari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baccari, P., Nifosi, J., Ghirardelli, L. et al. Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia. Hernia 17, 567–572 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1026-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1026-y

Keywords

Navigation