Abstract
Background. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration was established to provide reliable evaluation of newer methods of groin hernia repair. It involved 70 investigators in 20 countries.
Materials and methods. Twenty eligible trials (5016 participants) of open mesh vs. non-mesh groin hernia repair were identified. Meta-analysis was performed using raw individual patient data where possible.
Results. Fewer hernia recurrences were reported after mesh repair. There were no clear differences between mesh and non-mesh groups in complications. Overall, those in the mesh groups had a shorter hospital stay, quicker return to usual activities and less frequent persisting pain, but individual trial results varied.
Conclusions. The review provides strong evidence that open mesh repair is associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence of between 50% and 75%. There is also some evidence of quicker recovery and of lower rates of persisting pain following open mesh repair.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0087-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, A. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials leased on individual patient data. Hernia 6, 130–136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1