Zusammenfassung
Die Therapie von Patienten mit einem CUP-Syndrom (CUP:„cancer of unknown primary“) entsprechend dem Ursprungsgewebe ist Teil der Standardbehandlung, wenn sich in der Immunhistologie oder in der Kombination mit klinischen und laborchemischen Parametern große Ähnlichkeiten mit bekannten Tumoren erweisen. Auch mittels Genexpressions- oder Methylierungsanalysen können molekulare Ähnlichkeiten mit bekannten Tumoren nachgewiesen werden. Wenige retrospektive Untersuchungen scheinen einen Vorteil für Patienten zu zeigen, die eine Behandlung passend zu dem molekular definierten Tumor erhielten. Ein Nachweis der Überlegenheit einer auf eine solche Testung basierenden Therapiestrategie steht jedoch aus. Die Suche nach molekularen Zielen führt bei einem kleinen Teil der Patienten zur Möglichkeit der zielgerichteten Behandlung mit für andere Indikationen zugelassenen Medikamenten und kasuistischen Berichten über entsprechende Therapien.
Abstract
Treatment of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome according to the tissue of origin is part of the standard care if the suspected original tumor is similar in immunohistochemistry or in combination with clinical and laboratory parameters. Gene expression analysis or methylation assays can demonstrate similarities of the CUP samples with known tumors. A few retrospective analyses seem to show an advantage for patients who received a therapy that matched with the molecularly defined tumor. Currently, the superiority of such a therapy based on the molecularly defined tissue of origin is not proven. The search for molecular targets leads in a small proportion of patients to the possibility of targeted therapy with drugs approved for other indications and published case reports on such treatment.
Literatur
Bhargava R, Dabbs DJ (2013) Cancer of unknown primary origin: using ancillary techniques with caution. J Clin Oncol 31:1478–1479. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9056
Chiang WM, Kapadia M, Laver NV, Nystrom JS (2012) Cancer of unknown primary: from immunohistochemistry to gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 30:e300–e302. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.41.1827
Fizazi K, Greco FA, Pavlidis N et al (2015) Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26:v133–v138. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv305
Hainsworth JD, Rubin MS, Spigel DR et al (2013) Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah cannon research institute. J Clin Oncol 31:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3755
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–2342. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032691
Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H et al (2015) PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med 372:2509–2520. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
Martineau G, Laplanche A, Van de Wouw AW et al (2014) GEFCAPI 04: a phase III trial comparing a treatment oriented by a molecular analysis with CancerTYPE ID test to cisplatin-gemcitabine in patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary (CUP). J Clin Oncol 32:TPS11134
Moran S, Martínez-Cardús A, Sayols S et al (2016) Epigenetic profiling to classify cancer of unknown primary: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 17(10):1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30297-2
Raghav K, Mhadgut H, McQuade JL et al (2016) Cancer of unknown primary in adolescents and young adults: clinicopathological features, prognostic factors and survival outcomes. PLOS ONE 11:e154985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154985
Ross JS, Wang K, Gay L et al (2015) Comprehensive genomic profiling of carcinoma of unknown primary site: new routes to targeted therapies. JAMA Oncol 1:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.216
Le Tourneau C, Delord J‑P, Gonçalves A et al (2015) Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(13):1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6
Varadhachary GR, Karanth S, Qiao W et al (2014) Carcinoma of unknown primary with gastrointestinal profile: immunohistochemistry and survival data for this favorable subset. Int J Clin Oncol 19:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0583-0
Varadhachary GR, Raghav KPS, Pant S et al (2017) Phase II study for the evaluation of efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with cancer of unknown primary. J Clin Oncol 35:TPS3103
Yoon HH, Foster NR, Meyers JP et al (2016) Gene expression profiling identifies responsive patients with cancer of unknown primary treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and everolimus: NCCTG N0871 (alliance). Ann Oncol 27:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv543
Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH et al (2017) Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med 23:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4333
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
G. Folprecht: Honorare für Vorträge/Advisory Boards von Merck-Serono, Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Shire/Baxalta, Amgen, BMS, MSD, Mundipharma. Studienunterstützung: Merck-Serono.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Folprecht, G. CUP – Therapie nach Molekularpathologie oder mit Immuntherapie. Onkologe 23, 1006–1010 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-017-0308-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-017-0308-5