Skip to main content
Log in

Common complications of segmental bone transport with Ilizarov technique in defective tibia pseudoarthrosis: a review

Complications de la technique d’Ilizarov dans les pseudarthroses du tibia

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In tibial pseudoarthrosis, segmental bone transport with Ilizarov external fixator is being widely applicated all around the world, with encouraging successful outcomes. As the treatment with this technique requires a long period of time, the surgeon may face many problems which may negatively affect the final outcome. Pin tract infection, early or delayed consolidation, axial deviation and translation at the target area, skin inversion, rupture of the bone by the wires and joint contractures or stiffness form the main and common clinical problems. The rate of failure and complications with Ilizarov method used for diaphysial bone defects are so rare when precise technical details are carried out. With other treatment modalities, it is usually too difficult to obtain union synchronously with infection eradication. Thus, the Ilizarov technique presents successful outcomes against some complications mentioned above. Segmental bone transport is a surgical technique in which some of the problems can never be prevented. However, close patient follow up and always keeping the problems in mind make early diagnosis possible. With the early recognition of problems, successful treatment and increased overall outcome can be expected.

Résumé

Dans le traitement des pseudarthroses du tibia, le transfert osseux grâce au fixateur externe d’Ilizarov est largement utilisé dans le monde entier avec des succès encourageants. A cause de la longueur du traitement, le chirurgien doit faire face à de nombreux problèmes qui risquent d’affecter le résultat final. L’infection des broches, la consolidation trop précoce ou au contraire retardée, la déviation axiale ou la translation dans la zone cible, l’invagination cutanée, la fracture osseuse par la rétraction articulaire ou la raideur sont les problèmes les plus courants et les plus importants. Le taux de complications pour la méthode d’Ilizarov appliquée aux défects diaphysaires est en fait rare lorsque la technique est utilisée de façon précise dans ses moindres détails. Avec d’autres méthodes il est souvent difficile d’obtenir la consolidation osseuse de façon synchrone avec l’éradication de l’infection. La technique d’Ilizarov permet des succès malgré les complications citées plus haut. Le transfert osseux segmentaire est une technique chirurgicale dans laquelle il n’est jamais possible de prévenir toute complication. Mais, le suivi rapproché des patients et le fait d’avoir continuellement ces problèmes à l’esprit, permet le diagnostic précoce de ces complications. Grâce à cette reconnaissance précoce des problèmes, on est en droit d’espérer un résultat favorable malgré tout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aronson J, Johnson E, Harp JH (1989) Local bone transportation for treatment of intercalary defects by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:71–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basbozkurt M, Gür E (1999) Defekt Psödoartrozları ve Kemik Defektlerinde Tedavi. In: Çakmak M, Kocaoğlu M (eds) İlizarov Cerrahisi ve Prensipleri. İstanbul, Doruk grafik, pp 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catagni M (1991) Lengthening of the tibia. In: Maiocchi AB, Aronson J (eds) Operative principles of Ilizarov. Medi Surgical Video, Milan, pp 288–309

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cierny G, Zorn KE (1994) Segmental tibial defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:118–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cimbrelo EG, Marti-Gonzales JC (2004) Circular external fixation in tibial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 419:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Olsen B, Ruiz-Yague M, Fernandez-Baillo N, Munuera-Martinez L (1992) Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 283:116–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl MT, Gulli B, Berg T (1994) Complications of limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:10–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dendrinos GK, Kontos S, Lyritsis E (1995) Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of nonunion of the tibia associated with infection. J Bone Joint Surg 77-A(6):835–846

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green SA (1991) Postoperative management during limb lengthening. Orthop Clin North Am 22(4):723–734

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Green SA (1994) Skeletal defects: a comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental skeletal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:111–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ilizarov GA (1990) Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:8–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilizarov GA (1989) The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Clin Orthop Relat Res 238:249–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. İnan M (1999) Komplikasyonlar ve zorluklar. In: Çakmak M, Kocaoğlu M (eds) İlizarov Cerrahisi ve Prensipleri. İstanbul, Doruk grafik, pp 237–253

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jenny G, Jenny JY, Mosser JJ (1993) Ilizarov’s method in infected tibial pseudoarthrosis and for reconstruction of bone defects. Orthop Traumatol 3:55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T, Matsuda S, Shimomura Y (1988) Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 70-B:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kristiansen LP, Steen H, Terjesen T (2003) Residual challenges after healing of congenital pseudarthrosis in the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:228–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marsh DR, Shah S, Elliott J, Kurdy N (1997) The Ilizarov method in nonunion, malunion and infection of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(2):273–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayo KA, Benirschke SK (1990) Treatment of tibial malunions and nonunions with reamed intramedullary nails. Orthop Clin North Am 21(4):715–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Naggar L, Chevalley F, Blanc CH, Livio JJ (1993) Treatment of large bone defects with the Ilizarov technique. J Trauma 34(3):390–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Öztürkmen Y, Doğrul C, Karlı M (2003) Alt ekstremite psödoartrozlarında Ilizarov yöntemi ve tedavi sonuçları. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 37(1):9–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F, Villa A, Benedetti GB, Cattaneo R (1989) Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:146–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paley D, Chaudrey M, Pirone AM, Lentz P, Kautz D (1990) Treatment of malunions and mal-nonunions of the femur and tibia by detailed preoperative planning and the Ilizarov techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 21(4):667–691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Polyzois D, Papachristou G, Kotsiopoulos K, Plessas S (1997) Treatment of tibial and femoral bone loss by distraction osteogenesis. Acta Orthop Scand 68(Suppl 275):84–88

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rose R (2002) The Ilizarov technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects. West Indian Med J 51(4):263–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwartsman V, Choi SH, Schwartsman R (1990) Tibial nonunions: Treatment tactics with the Ilizarov method. Orthop Clin North Am 21:639–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sen C, Kocaoğlu M, Eralp L, Gulsen M, Cinar M (2004) Bifocal compression-distraction in the acute treatment of grade III open tibia fractures with bone and soft-tissue loss. J Orthop Trauma 18(3):150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tucker HL, Kendra JC, Kinnebrew TE (1990) Tibial defects: reconstruction using the method of Ilizarov as an alternative. Orthop Clin North Am 21:629–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. White SH, Kenwright J (1990) The timing of distraction of an osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72-B:356–361

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young NL, Davis RJ, Bell DF, Redmond DM (1993) Electromyographic and nerve conduction changes after tibial lengthening by the Ilizarov method. J Pediatr Orthop 13(4):473–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meric Cirpar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cirpar, M., Cetik, O., Uslu, M. et al. Common complications of segmental bone transport with Ilizarov technique in defective tibia pseudoarthrosis: a review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16, 380–385 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-006-0089-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-006-0089-9

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation