Skip to main content
Log in

Paget disease of the spine: an evaluation of 101 patients with a histomorphometric analysis of 29 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) is the second most frequent metabolic bone disease with the spine being a common site of manifestation. Still, neither the disease’s etiology nor reasons for its manifestation at preferred skeletal sites are understood. The aim of the current study was therefore to perform a histologic and histomorphometric analysis of PBD biopsies of the spine to achieve a more detailed understanding concerning PDB activity and characteristics.

Materials and methods

Out of 754 cases with histologically proven PDB, 101 cases were identified to have involvement of the spine. A total of 29 individual vertebral body biopsies were available for histologic and histomorphometric analysis and were compared to age- and sex-matched spinal bone specimens obtained from skeletal-intact individuals at autopsy. Histomorphometric results were correlated with vertebral body height, disease location and iliac crest biopsies.

Results

In the majority of patients, PDB was located in the lumbar spine (62.2%). The cervical spine was affected in 8.2% of all cases with involvement of the second vertebral body (C2) in every other case. In comparison to age-matched individuals, histomorphometric analysis of vertebral body biopsies revealed a significant increase both in trabecular bone volume as well as osteoid parameters. In comparison to histomorphometric data obtained for extra-spinal skeletal locations affected by PDB (iliac crest), no differences in bone micro-architecture or disease activity were observed.

Conclusion

Disease activity in terms of osteoblast and osteoclast number does not appear to be significantly associated with disease location when spinal and iliac bone biopsies are compared. However, a positive correlation between vertebral body height and density in skeletal-intact individuals and disease incidence was observed leading to the conclusion that vertebral body height and possibly at least the spine bone volume together with bone density might play an important role in the incidence of PDB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seitz S, Priemel M, Zustin J, Beil FT, Semler J, Minne H, Schinke T, Amling M (2009) Paget’s disease of bone: histologic analysis of 754 patients. J Bone Miner Res 24:62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman RD (1980) Musculoskeletal manifestations of Paget’s disease of bone. Arthritis Rheum 23:1121–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meunier PJ, Salson C, Mathieu L, Chapuy MC, Delmas P, Alexandre C, Charhon S (1987) Skeletal distribution and biochemical parameters of Paget’s disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 217:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hadjipavlou A, Lander P (1991) Paget disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1376–1381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirra JM, Brien EW, Tehranzadeh J (1995) Paget’s disease of bone: review with emphasis on radiologic features, Part I. Skeletal Radiol 24:163–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirra JM, Brien EW, Tehranzadeh J (1995) Paget’s disease of bone: review with emphasis on radiologic features, Part II. Skeletal Radiol 24:173–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davie M, Davies M, Francis R, Fraser W, Hosking D, Tansley R (1999) Paget’s disease of bone: a review of 889 patients. Bone 24:11S–12S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis RJ, Jacoes B, Marchisello PJ, Bullough PG (1977) Monostotic Paget’s disease of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 127:208–211

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amling M, Werner M, Posl M, Maas R, Korn U, Delling G (1995) Calcifying solitary bone cyst: morphological aspects and differential diagnosis of sclerotic bone tumours. Virchows Arch 426:235–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2:595–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meunier PJ, Coindre JM, Edouard CM, Arlot ME (1980) Bone histomorphometry in Paget’s disease. Quantitative and dynamic analysis of pagetic and nonpagetic bone tissue. Arthritis Rheum 23:1095–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Limthongkul W, Karaikovic EE, Savage JW, Markovic A (2010) Volumetric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine J 10:153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saifuddin A, Hassan A (2003) Paget’s disease of the spine: unusual features and complications. Clin Radiol 58:102–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown HP, LaRocca H, Wickstrom JK (1971) Paget’s disease of the atlas and axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:1441–1444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, Baisden JL, Aktay R, Shender BS, Paskoff G, Laud P (2006) Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae. Bone 39:336–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B (2001) Magnetic resonance appearance of uncomplicated Paget’s disease of bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 5:69–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadjipavlou AG, Gaitanis LN, Katonis PG, Lander P (2001) Paget’s disease of the spine and its management. Eur Spine J 10:370–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lander PH, Hadjipavlou AG (1986) A dynamic classification of Paget’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:431–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Barvencik.

Additional information

J. M. Pestka and S. Seitz contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pestka, J.M., Seitz, S., Zustin, J. et al. Paget disease of the spine: an evaluation of 101 patients with a histomorphometric analysis of 29 cases. Eur Spine J 21, 999–1006 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2133-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2133-7

Keywords

Navigation