Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total costs for patients who are sick-listed due to back and neck problems have not previously been determined prospectively on an individual basis. This study aimed to determine the total cost to a society, based on individually assessed costs of health services and loss of production in people who are sick-listed 28 days or more for back or neck problems. Detailed data on individuals’ health-care consumption due to back or neck problems was collected through prospectively entered diaries and questionnaires, after 4 weeks, 3 months, 1 and 2 years, in a consecutively selected cohort of 1,822 employed persons aged between 18 and 59 years. Costs for health care and production losses due to work absenteeism were determined individually and combined to render total costs to society. The costs for all medical services during the 2-year study were 6.9% of total costs for back and neck problems. The single most expensive medical service was surgery. Transferred to a national level, annual total costs for back and neck problems corresponded to 1% of GNP. In conclusion, direct health-service costs were a small fraction of the total costs, consequently indirect costs offer the greatest potential for savings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abenhaim L, Suissa S (1987) Importance and economic burden of occupational back pain: A study of 2,500 cases representative of Quebec. J Occup Med 29:670–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergendorff S, Hansson E, Hansson T et al (1997) Projektbeskrivning & undersökningsgrupp. Rikförsäkringsverket. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm

  3. Bigos S (1994) Acute low-back problems in adults. In: Clinical practice guidelines. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA

  4. Bloch F, Prins R (eds) (2000) Who returns to work and why? A six-country study on work incapacity and reintegration. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

  5. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A et al (1994) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: An inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ 308:577–580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyle D, Richardson G (1994) The cost of back pain. In: Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on back pain. HMSO, London, pp 65–71

  7. Doorn van JW (1995) Low back disability among self-employed dentists, veterinarians, physicians and physical therapists in The Netherlands. A retrospective study over a 13-year period (N=1,119) and an early intervention program with 1-year follow-up (N=134). Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 263:1–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G et al (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University, Oxford

  9. Englund L (2000) Sick-listing attitudes and doctors’ practice. Faculty of medicine. Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala

  10. Eriksson S (1979) Statistisk undersökningsmetodik. Studentlitteraturett förlag inom. Utbildningshuset, Lund, Sweden

  11. Goossens M, Evers J (1997) Economic evaluation of back pain interventions. J Occup Rehabil 7:15–32

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goossens M, Rutten-van Molken M, Vlaeyen J et al (2000) The cost diary: A method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost- effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 53:688–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo H-R, Tanaka S, Cameron L et al (1995) Back pain among workers in the United States: National estimates and workers at high risk. Am J Ind Med 28:591–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansson E, Hansson T (1999) Rygg och Nacke 3. Medicinska åtgärder för sjukskrivna med rygg- och nackbesvär. Rfv SU, Stockholm, pp 1–74

  15. Hansson T, Hansson E (2000) The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine 25:3055–3064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henriksson F (2001) Economic aspects of chronic diseases: Multiple sclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Elderly Care Research, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital. Stockholm University, Stockholm, pp 1–396

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hutubessy R, van Tulder M, Vondeling H et al (1999) Indirect costs of back pain in The Netherlands: A comparison of the human-capital method with the friction cost method. Pain 80:201–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 20:473–477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johannesson M, Karlsson G (1997) The friction cost method: A comment. J Health Econ 16:249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koopmanschap M, Rutten F, van Ineveld B et al (1995) The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 14:171–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Landstingsförbundet (1995) Kostnad per vårdtillfälle, vårddag, läkarbesök m m 1993. Landstingsförbundet, Stockholm

  22. Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: A review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16:23–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahmud M, Webster B, Courtney T et al (2000) Clinical management and the duration of disability for work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med 42:1178–1187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T et al (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain—bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 332:351–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meltzer M (2001) Introduction to health economics for physicians. Lancet 358:993–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. Lippincott, Philadelphia

  27. Nachemson A, Jonsson E (eds) (2000) Ont i ryggen, ont i nacken. SBU Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, Stockholm, p 417 (vol I), p 389 (vol II)

  28. Nachemson A, Spitzer W (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine [Suppl 1] 12(7S)

  29. Riksförsäkringsverket (1996) Sjukfrånvarons diagnoser och avslutningsanledningar. RFV Redovisar 1996:3. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riksförsäkringsverket (1997) Nybeviljade förtidspensioner/sjukbidrag 1996. RFV Informerar. Statistikinformation Is-I 1997:3. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

  31. Riksförsäkringsverket (2002) Vad kostar olika sjukdomar? Sjukpenningkostnaderna fördelade efter sjukskrivningsdiagnos RFV Redovisar 2002:2. Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm

  32. Riksförsäkringsverket (Försäkringskassan i Göteborg) Christer Gustavsson BA (1997) Sjukskrivningsdagar för ryggont i Göteborg 1987 respektive 1992–1996. Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg

  33. Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L (1988) Working disability due to occupational back pain: 3-year follow-up of 2,300 compensated workers in Quebec. J Occup Med 30:502–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Skargren E, Carlsson P, Oberg B (1998) One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain. Subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health-care utilization. Spine 23:1875–1883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Skargren E, Oberg B, Carlsson P et al (1997) Cost and effectiveness analysis of chiropractic and physiotherapy treatment for low back and neck pain. Six-month follow-up. Spine 22:2167–2177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Skovron M, Szpalski M, Nordin M et al (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults. Spine 19:129–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Socialförsäkringsregisterlag (1997) SFS, Sweden

  38. Spengler D, Bigos S, Martin N et al (1986) Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine 11:241–245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering S (2003) Sjukskrivning—orsaker, konsekvenser och praxis. Stockholm

  40. Statistiska centralbyrån S (2000) Arbetsförhållanden och sjukskrivning med ersättning. SOU 2000:121. Statistiska centralbyrån, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tulder van M, Koes B, Bouter L (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Waddell G (1987) Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment. Clin Orthop:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  43. Waddell G (1991) Low back disability. A syndrome of Western civilization. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2:719–738

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Waddell G, Aylward M, Sawney P (2002) Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. Royal Society of Medicine, London

  45. Walker B (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: A systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13:205–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weinstein M, Siegel J, Gold M et al (1996) Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276:1253–1258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from The Medical Faculty, Göteborg University and the Swedish Council for Social Research. We are greatly indebted to Professor Ed Palmer at the Evaluation Department, National Social Insurance Board for his invaluable cooperation, to Associate Professor Robert Jonsson for statistical advice and Professor Alf Nachemson for his great support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

    Elisabeth K. Hansson & Tommy H. Hansson

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna stråket 11, 413 45 , Göteborg, Sweden

    Elisabeth K. Hansson

Authors
  1. Elisabeth K. Hansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tommy H. Hansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth K. Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, E.K., Hansson, T.H. The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients. Eur Spine J 14, 337–345 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0731-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0731-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation