Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to clarify whether the short-term adverse neonatal outcomes associated with epidural analgesia are due to the epidural analgesia itself or to the instrumental delivery.

Methods

A retrospective case–control study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between epidural analgesia, labor length, and perinatal outcomes. A total of 350 pregnant women at term who delivered under epidural analgesia (cases) were compared with 1400 patients without epidural analgesia (controls).

Results

Vacuum extraction (6.5 vs. 2.9 %) and cesarean section (19.9 vs. 11.1 %) were more frequently performed in the cases than controls (p < 0.001). Using a Kaplan–Meier algorithm, it was determined that the mean lengths of the 1st and 2nd stages of labor and the overall durations of labor and delivery were significantly longer in cases compared with controls. A Cox regression analysis showed that the longer labor remained even after adjustment for parity. The neonatal variables stratified by mode of delivery were not different in cases and controls, except for a slightly lower umbilical arterial pH in spontaneous delivery for the cases group. However, the Apgar scores and umbilical arterial pH were significantly lower in the neonates delivered by vacuum extraction compared with those in the neonates delivered by spontaneous delivery or cesarean section, regardless of whether epidural analgesia was performed. A multivariable analysis showed that vacuum extraction much more consistently affected the arterial pH than the analgesia itself (the β coefficients were −0.036 for epidural analgesia vs. −0.050 for vacuum extraction).

Conclusion

Epidural analgesia was associated with slowly progressing labor, thus resulting in an increased rate of instrumental delivery. This instrumental delivery appears to adversely affect the neonatal outcomes more strongly than the analgesia itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998;280:2105–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leighton BL, Halpern SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S69–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reynolds F. The effects of maternal labour analgesia on the fetus. Best Pract Res. 2009;24:289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Westgren M, Lindahl SG, Norden NE. Maternal and fetal endocrine stress response at vaginal delivery with and without an epidural block. J Perinat Med. 1986;14:235–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shnider SM, Abboud TK, Artal R, Henriksen EH, Stefani SJ, Levinson G. Maternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147:13–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deckardt R, Fembacher PM, Schneider KT, Graeff H. Maternal arterial oxygen saturation during labor and delivery: pain-dependent alterations and effects on the newborn. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:21–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arfeen Z, Armstrong PJ, Whitfield A. The effects of Entonox and epidural analgesia on arterial oxygen saturation of women in labour. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:32–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffin RP, Reynolds F. Maternal hypoxaemia during labour and delivery: the influence of analgesia and effect on neonatal outcome. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds F. Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:38–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Nyberg P, Dykes AK. Obstetric risk indicators for labour dystocia in nulliparous women: a multi-centre cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma SK, McIntire DD, Wiley J, Leveno KJ. Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:142–8 (discussion 6A).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ. 2004;328:1410.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lieberman E, Davidson K, Lee-Parritz A, Shearer E. Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:974–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shields SG, Ratcliffe SD, Fontaine P, Leeman L. Dystocia in nulliparous women. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:1671–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leighton BL, Halpern SH, Wilson DB. Lumbar sympathetic blocks speed early and second stage induced labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1039–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, Yaghmour E, Marcus RJ, Sherwani SS, Sproviero MT, Yilmaz M, Patel R, Robles C, Grouper S. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:655–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benedetto C, Marozio L, Prandi G, Roccia A, Blefari S, Fabris C. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Wang YA, Black D, Tracy M. Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: a population-based study. Women Birth. 2007;20:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Caliskan E, Ozdamar D, Doger E, Cakiroglu Y, Kus A, Corakci A. Prospective case control comparison of fetal intrapartum oxygen saturations during epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:77–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds F, Sharma SK, Seed PT. Analgesia in labour and fetal acid–base balance: a meta-analysis comparing epidural with systemic opioid analgesia. BJOG. 2002;109:1344–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Porter J, Bonello E, Reynolds F. Effect of epidural fentanyl on neonatal respiration. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:79–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernando R, Bonello E, Gill P, Urquhart J, Reynolds F, Morgan B. Neonatal welfare and placental transfer of fentanyl and bupivacaine during ambulatory combined spinal epidural analgesia for labour. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:517–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishna BR, Zakowski MI, Grant GJ. Sufentanil transfer in the human placenta during in vitro perfusion. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Dr. Dianella Ravagli and Dr. Alberto Bartolini for their excellent support in collecting subjects.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy

    Junichi Hasegawa, Antonio Farina & Margherita Zanello

  2. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bologna University Hospital, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Via Massarenti 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Turchi, Yuko Hasegawa & Simonetta Baroncini

Authors
  1. Junichi Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Farina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giovanni Turchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuko Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margherita Zanello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simonetta Baroncini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichi Hasegawa.

About this article

Cite this article

Hasegawa, J., Farina, A., Turchi, G. et al. Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome. J Anesth 27, 43–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1480-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1480-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation