Abstract
Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for acute biliary inflammation/infection (acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis), according to severity grade, have not yet been established in the world. Therefore we formulated flowcharts for the management of acute biliary inflammation/infection in accordance with severity grade. For mild (grade I) acute cholangitis, medical treatment may be sufficient/appropriate. For moderate (grade II) acute cholangitis, early biliary drainage should be performed. For severe (grade III) acute cholangitis, appropriate organ support such as ventilatory/circulatory management is required. After hemodynamic stabilization is achieved, urgent endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage should be performed. For patients with acute cholangitis of any grade of severity, treatment for the underlying etiology, including endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical treatment should be performed after the patient’s general condition has improved. For patients with mild (grade I) cholecystitis, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment. For patients with moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is preferred. In patients with extensive local inflammation, elective cholecystectomy is recommended after initial management with percutaneous gallbladder drainage and/or cholecystostomy. For the patient with severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis, multiorgan support is a critical part of management. Biliary peritonitis due to perforation of the gallbladder is an indication for urgent cholecystectomy and/or drainage. Delayed elective cholecystectomy may be performed after initial treatment with gallbladder drainage and improvement of the patient’s general medical condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute biliary inflammation/infection is classified as either acute cholangitis or acute cholecystitis, and ranges from mild forms that improve with medical treatment to severe forms that require intensive care and urgent intervention. The medical condition of a patient with biliary inflammation/infection is likely to deteriorate rapidly and the condition can become life-threatening. Early diagnosis should be made based on clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory findings. The type and timing of treatment should be based on the grade of severity of the disease.
Although endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques have advanced recently (level 1b–2b),1,2 the treatment of severe acute biliary inflammation/infection still results in fatalities and increased hospital costs. To our knowledge, there are no definite diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for acute biliary inflammation/infection according to the grade of severity of the disease. This article describes the management strategy for biliary inflammation/infection in accordance with the severity of the biliary disease. Guidelines were developed, based on best clinical evidence and discussions at the International Consensus Meeting held in Tokyo on April 1–2, 2006.
General guidance for the management of acute biliary inflammation/infection
A flowchart showing general guidance for the management of acute biliary inflammation/infection is presented in Fig. 1.
Clinical presentation
Clinical findings associated with acute cholangitis include abdominal pain, jaundice, fever (Charcot’s triad), and rigor. The triad was already reported as an indicator of hepatic fever by Charcot in 1877,3 and has been, historically, used as the generally accepted clinical findings of acute cholangitis. About 50%–70% of patients with acute cholangitis develop all three symptoms (level 2b-4).4–7 Reynolds’ pentad (Charcot’s triad plus shock and a decreased level of consciousness) was presented in 1959, when Reynolds and Dargan8 defined acute obstructive cholangitis. The pentad is often used to indicate severe (grade III) cholangitis, but shock and a decreased level of consciousness are observed in only 30% or fewer patients with acute cholangitis (level 2b-4).4–7 A history of biliary disease, such as gallstones, previous biliary procedures, or the placement of a biliary stent are factors that are very helpful to suggest a diagnosis of acute cholangitis.
Clinical symptoms of acute cholecystitis include abdominal pain (right upper abdominal pain), nausea, vomiting, and fever (level 2b-4).9–11 The most typical symptom is right epigastric pain. Tenderness in the right upper abdomen, a palpable gallbladder, and Murphy’s sign are the characteristic findings of acute cholecystitis. A positive Murphy’s sign has a specificity of 79%–96% (level 2b–3b)9,11 for acute cholecystitis.
Blood tests
The diagnosis of acute cholangitis requires a white blood cell count; measurement of the C-reactive protein level; and liver function tests, including alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and bilirubin. Assessment of the severity of the illness requires knowledge of the platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and prothrombin time (PT). Blood cultures are also helpful for severity assessment, as well as for the selection of antimicrobial drugs. Hyperamylasemia is a useful parameter to identify complications such as choledocholithiasis causing biliary pancreatitis (level 1a).12
There is no specific blood test for acute cholecystitis; however, the white blood cell count and the measurement of C-reactive protein is very useful in confirming an inflammatory process. Bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and PT are very useful in assessing the disease severity status of the patient.
Diagnostic imaging
Abdominal ultrasound (US) and abdominal computerized tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast are very helpful studies in evaluating patients with acute biliary tract disease. Abdominal US should be performed in all patients suspected of having acute biliary inflammation/infection. Ultrasound examination has satisfactory diagnostic capability when it is performed not only by specialists but also by emergency physicians (level 1b).13,14
The role of diagnostic imaging in acute cholangitis is to determine the presence/absence of biliary obstruction, the level of the obstruction, and the cause of the obstruction, such as gallstones and/or biliary strictures. Assessment should include both US and CT. These studies complement each other and CT may better demonstrate dilatation of the bile duct and pneumobilia.
Some of the characteristic finding of acute cholecystitis include an enlarged gallbladder, thickened gallbladder wall, gallbladder stones and/or debris in the gallbladder, sonographic Murphy’s sign, pericholecystic fluid, and pericholecystic abscess. Sonographic Murphy’s sign is a very reliable finding of acute cholecystitis, with a specificity exceeding 90% (level 3b,4).15,16 CT scan or even plain X-ray may demonstrate free air, pneumobilia, and ileus.
Differential diagnosis
Diseases which should be differentiated from acute cholangitis are acute cholecystitis, gastric and duodenal ulcer, acute pancreatitis, acute hepatitis, and septicemia of other origins. Diseases which should be differentiated from acute cholecystitis are gastric and duodenal ulcer, hepatitis, pancreatitis, gallbladder cancer, hepatic abscess, Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome, right lower lobar pneumonia, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and urinary infection.
Flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis
A flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis is shown in Fig. 2. The treatment of acute cholangitis should be guided by the grade of severity of the disease. Biliary drainage and antibiotics are the two most important elements of treatment. When a diagnosis of acute cholangitis is suspected, medical treatment, including nil per os (NPO) and the use of intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and analgesia, together with close monitoring of blood pressure, pulse, and urinary output should be initiated. Simultaneously, a severity assessment of the cholangitis should be documented, even if it is mild. Frequent reassessment is important, and patients may need to be reclassified as having mild (grade I), moderate (grade II), or severe (grade III) disease, based on the response to medical treatment. Appropriate treatment should be performed in accordance with the severity grade. Patients with concomitant diseases such as acute pancreatitis or malignant tumor, and elderly patients are likely to progress to a severe level; therefore, such patients should be monitored frequently.
Mild (grade I) acute cholangitis
Medical treatment may be sufficient. Biliary drainage is not required in most cases. However, for nonresponders to medical treatment, the necessity of biliary drainage should be considered. Treatment options such as endoscopic, percutaneous, or operative intervention may be required, depending on the etiology. Some patients, such as those who develop postoperative cholangitis, may only require antibiotics and generally do not require intervention.
Moderate (grade II) acute cholangitis
Patients with acute cholangitis who do not respond to medical treatment have moderate (grade II) acute cholangitis. In these patients, early endoscopic or percutaneous drainage or even emergent operative drainage with a T-tube should be performed. A definitive procedure should be performed to remove the cause of the obstruction once the patient is in a stable condition.
Severe (grade III) acute cholangitis
Patients with acute cholangitis and organ failure are classified as having severe (grade III) acute cholangitis. These patients require organ support, such as ventilatory/circulatory management (e.g., endotracheal intubation, artificial respiration management, and the use of vasopressin), and treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in addition to the general medical management. Urgent biliary drainage must be anticipated. When the patient is stabilized, urgent (ASAP) endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or an emergent operation with decompression of the bile duct with a T-tube should be performed. Definitive treatment of the cause of the obstruction, including endoscopic, percutaneous, or operative intervention, should be considered once the acute illness has resolved.
Results of the Tokyo International Consensus Meeting
At the International Consensus Meeting, responses to the flowcharts for the management of the different grades of acute cholangitis were elicited and a consensus was reached (Fig. 3).
Flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis
A flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis is shown in Fig. 4. Early cholecystectomy is recommended for most patients, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the preferred method. Among high-risk patients, percutaneous gallbladder drainage is an alternative therapy for those patients who cannot safely undergo urgent/early cholecystectomy (level 4).17,18
When a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is suspected, medical treatment, including NPO, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and analgesia, together with close monitoring of blood pressure, pulse, and urinary output should be initiated. Simultaneously, the grade of severity needs to be established. Appropriate treatment should be performed in accordance with the severity grade. The assessment of operative risk should also be evaluated based on the severity grade.
After the acute inflammation has been resolved by medical treatment and gallbladder drainage, it is desirable to perform a cholecystectomy to prevent recurrence. In surgically high-risk patients with cholecystolithasis, medical support after percutaneous cholecystolithotomy should be considered (level 4).19–21 For patients with acalculous cholecystitis, cholecystectomy is not required, because recurrence of acute acalculous cholecystitis after gallbladder drainage is rare (level 4).17,22
Mild (grade I) acute cholecystitis
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment. Elective cholecystectomy may be selected (if early cholecystectomy is not performed) in order to improve other medical problems.
Moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis
Early laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is preferred. If a patient has serious local inflammation making early cholecystectomy difficult, then percutaneous or operative drainage of the gallbladder is recommended. Elective cholecystectomy can be performed after improvement of the acute inflammatory process.
Severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis
Severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis is accompanied by organ dysfunction and/or severe local inflammation. Appropriate organ support in addition to medical treatment is necessary for patients with organ dysfunction. Management of severe local inflammation by percutaneous gallbladder drainage and/or cholecystectomy is needed. Biliary peritonitis due to perforation of the gallbladder is an indication for urgent cholecystectomy and drainage. Elective cholecystectomy may be performed after improvement of the acute illness by gallbladder drainage.
Results of the Tokyo International Consensus Meeting
At the International Consensus Meeting, flowcharts for the management of mild (grade I) and severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis were agreed upon by almost all of the participants; however, the flowchart for moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis was agreed upon by fewer than 90% of the participants (Fig. 5).
References
EC Lai FP Mok ES Tan CM Lo ST Fan KT You et al. (1992) ArticleTitleEndoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis N Engl J Med 326 1582–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383mtFKktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1584258 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199206113262401
CM Lo CL Liu ST Fan EC Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 227 461–7 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9563529
M Charcot (1877) De la fievre hepatique symptomatique Comparison avec la fievre uroseptique Bourneville et Sevestre Paris
JH Boey LW Way (1980) ArticleTitleAcute cholangitis Ann Surg 191 264–70 10.1097/00000658-198003000-00002 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-198003000-00002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c7lt1eqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7362292
A Csendes JC Diaz P Burdiles F Maluenda E Morales (1992) ArticleTitleRisk factors and classification of acute suppurative cholangitis Br J Surg 79 655–8 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800790720 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38zltlOqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1643478
JP Welch GA Donaldson (1976) ArticleTitleThe urgency of diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute suppurative cholangitis Am J Surg 131 527–32 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90003-9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(76)90003-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE283gtlKnug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1275137
MJ O’Connor ML Schwartz DG McQuarrie HW Sumer (1982) ArticleTitleAcute bacterial cholangitis: an analysis of clinical manifestation Arch Surg 117 437–41 Occurrence Handle7065890
BM Reynolds EL Dargan (1959) ArticleTitleAcute obstructive cholangitis; a distinct clinical syndrome Ann Surg 150 299–303 10.1097/00000658-195908000-00013 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-195908000-00013 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaG1M7gtVensw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle13670595
M Eskelinen J Ikonen P Lipponen (1993) ArticleTitleDiagnostic approaches in acute cholecystitis; a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain Theor Surg 8 15–20
JR Staniland J Ditchburn FT De Dombal (1972) ArticleTitleClinical presentation of acute abdomen: study of 600 patients BMJ 3 393–8 10.1136/bmj.3.5823.393 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.3.5823.393 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE3s%2FgtlaitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle4506871
RL Trowbridge NK Rutkowski KG Shojania (2003) ArticleTitleDoes this patient have acute cholecystitis? JAMA 289 80–6 10.1001/jama.289.1.80 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.289.1.80 Occurrence Handle12503981
PA Abboud PF Malet JA Berlin R Staroscik MD Cabana JR Clarke et al. (1996) ArticleTitlePredictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis Gastrointest Endosc 44 450–5 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70098-6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70098-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FmtFegtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8905367
CL Rosen DF Brown Y Chang C Moore NJ Averill LJ Arkoff et al. (2001) ArticleTitleUltrasonography by emergency physicians in patients with suspected cholecystitis Am J Emerg Med 19 32–6 10.1053/ajem.2001.20028 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ajem.2001.20028 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7nsleluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11146014
JL Kendall RJ Shimp (2001) ArticleTitlePerformance and interpretation of focused right upper quadrant ultrasound by emergency physicians J Emerg Med 21 7–13 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00329-8 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00329-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjt1Snug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11399381
PW Ralls J Halls SA Lapin MF Quinn UL Morris W Boswell (1982) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of the sonographic Murphy sign in suspected acute cholecystitis J Clin Ultrasound 10 113–5 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jcu.1870100305 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL387ptVCgtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6804512
P Soyer JP Brouland M Boudiaf M Kardache JP Pelage Y Panis et al. (1998) ArticleTitleColor velocity imaging and power Doppler sonography of the gallbladder wall: a new look at sonographic diagnosis of acute cholecystitis Am J Roentgenol AJR 171 183–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhtFWiuw%3D%3D
M Sugiyama M Tokuhara Y Atomi (1998) ArticleTitleIs percutaneous cholecystostomy the optimal treatment for acute cholecystitis in the very elderly? World J Surg 22 459–63 10.1007/s002689900416 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900416 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3isFCnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9564288
S Chopra GD Dodd Suffix3rd AL Mumbower KN Chintapalli WH Schwesinger KR Sirinek et al. (2001) ArticleTitleTreatment of acute cholecystitis in non-critically ill patients at high surgical risk: comparison of clinical outcomes after gallbladder aspiration and after percutaneous cholecystostomy Am J Roentgenol AJR 176 1025–31 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7msF2guw%3D%3D
K Inui S Nakazawa Y Naito E Kimoto K Yamao (1988) ArticleTitleNonsurgical treatment of cholecystolithiasis with percutaneous transhepatic cholecystoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 83 1124–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1czjvVGlug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle3421223
GW Boland MJ Lee PR Mueller SL Dawson J Gaa DS Lu et al. (1994) ArticleTitleGallstones in critically ill patients with acute calculous cholecystitis treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy: nonsurgical therapeutic options Am J Roentgenol AJR 162 1101–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3hvFejtQ%3D%3D
AW Majeed MW Reed B Ross J Peacock AG Johnson (1997) ArticleTitleGallstone removal with a modified cholecystoscope: an alternative to cholecystectomy in the high-risk patient J Am Coll Surg 184 273–80 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3hsVGntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9060925
Y Shirai K Tsukada H Kawaguchi T Ohtani T Muto K Hatakeyama (1993) ArticleTitlePercutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis Br J Surg 80 1440–2 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800801129 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FntlKltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8252358
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our deep gratitude to the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, the Japan Biliary Association, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, who provided us with great support and guidance in the preparation of the Guidelines. This process was conducted as part of the project for the Preparation and Diffusion of Guidelines for the Management of Acute Cholangitis (H-15-Medicine-30), with a research subsidy for fiscal 2003 and 2004 (Integrated Research Project for Assessing Medical Technology), sponsored by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare.
We also truly appreciate the panelists who cooperated with and contributed significantly to the International Consensus Meeting held in Tokyo on April 1 and 2, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Miura, F., Takada, T., Kawarada, Y. et al. Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14, 27–34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1153-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1153-x