Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Palliative care (PC) and palliative radiotherapy (RT) consultation are integral to the care of patients with advanced cancer. These services are not universally available in rural areas, and travel to urban centers to access them can be burdensome for patients and families. The objectives of our study were to assess the feasibility of using videoconferencing to provide specialist multidisciplinary PC and palliative RT consultation to cancer patients in rural areas and to explore symptom, cost, and satisfaction outcomes.

Methods

The Virtual Pain and Symptom Control and Palliative Radiotherapy Clinic was piloted from January 2008 to March 2011. Cancer patients in rural northern Alberta attended local telehealth facilities, accompanied by nurses trained in symptom assessment. The multidisciplinary team at the Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton was linked by videoconference. Team recommendations were sent to the patients’ family physicians. Data were collected on referral, clinical, and consultation characteristics and symptom, cost, and satisfaction outcomes.

Results

Forty-four initial consultation and 28 follow-up visits took place. Mean Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores for anxiety and appetite were statistically significantly improved at the first follow-up visit (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Average per visit savings for patients seen by telehealth versus attending the CCI were 471.13 km, 7.96 hours, and Cdn $192.71, respectively. Patients and referring physicians indicated a high degree of satisfaction with the clinic.

Conclusion

Delivery of specialist multidisciplinary PC consultation by videoconferencing is feasible, may improve symptoms, results in cost savings to patients and families, and is satisfactory to users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 30(8):880–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Oorschot V, Schuler M, Simon A, Schleicher U, Geinitz H (2011) Patterns of care and course of symptoms in palliative radiotherapy: a multicenter pilot study analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 187:461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson CA, Pesut B, Bottorff JL, Mowry A, Broughton S, Fyles G (2009) Rural palliative care: a comprehensive review. J Palliat Med 12:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pesut B, Robinson CA, Bottorff JL, Fyles G, Broughton S (2010) On the road again: patient perspectives on commuting for palliative care. Palliat Support Care 8:187–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lockie SJ, Borttorff JL, Robinson CA, Pesut B (2010) Experiences of rural family caregivers who assist with commuting for palliative care. CJNR 42:74–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lavergne ML, Johnston GM, Gao J, Dummer TJB, Rheaume DE (2010) Variation in the use of palliative radiotherapy at end of life: examining demographic, clinical, health service, and geographic factors in a population-based study. Palliat Med 25:101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D (2001) Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 165:765–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitamura C, Zurawel-Balaura L, Wong RKS (2010) How effective is video consultation in clinical oncology? A systematic review. Curr Oncol 17:17–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palkhivala A (2011) Canada develops models of teleoncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1566–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoki N, Ohta S, Yamamoto H, Kikuchi N, Dunn K (2006) Triangulation analysis of tele-palliative care implementation in a rural community area in Japan. Telemed J E Health 12:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bensink M, Armfield N, Pinkerton R, Irving H, Hallahan A, Theodoros D, Russell T, Barnett AG, Scuffham PA, Wootton R (2009) Using videotelephony to support paediatric oncology-related palliative care in the home: from abandoned RCT to acceptability study. Palliat Med 23:228–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowles K, Baugh A (2007) Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. J Cardiovasc Nurs 22:5–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyle N, Khojainova N, Francavilla J, Gonzales G (2002) Audio-visual communication and its use in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 23:171–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagnon M, Lamothe L, Hebert M, Chanliau J, Fortin J (2006) Telehomecare for vulnerable populations: the evaluation of new models of care. Telemed J E Health 12:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Field M, Grigsby J (2002) Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. JAMA 288:423–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch J, Weaver L, Hall P, Langlois S, Stunt M, Schroder C, Bouvette M (2004) Using telehealth technology to support CME in end-of-life care for community physicians in Ontario. Telemed J E Health 10:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maudlin J, Keene J, Kobb R (2006) A road map for the last journey: home telehealth for holistic end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 23:399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan G, Craig B, Grant B, Sands A, Doherty N, Casey F (2008) Home videoconferencing for patients with severe congenital heart disease following discharge. Congenit Heart Dis 3:317–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Statistics Canada: Canada at a glance 2011. Available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-581-x/2011000/pop-eng.htm#t01. Accessed 21 Feb 2012

  20. Bruera E, Michaud M, Vigano A, Neumann CM, Watanabe S, Hanson J (2001) Multidisciplinary symptom control clinic in a cancer center: a retrospective study. Support Care Cancer 9:162–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fairchild A, Pituskin E, Rose B et al (2009) The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic. Support Care Cancer 17:163–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Danielson B, Fairchild A (2012) Beyond palliative radiotherapy: a pilot multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic. Support Care Cancer 20:773–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR (1975) ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychol Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scahg CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N (1996) Palliative Performance Scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care 12:5–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL (2008) A “TNM” classification system for cancer pain: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP). Support Care Cancer 16:547–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat: Travel. Available at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/hrpubs/tbm_113/menu-travel-voyage-eng.asp. Accessed 21 Feb 2012

  29. Kidd L, Cayless S, Johnston B, Wengstrom Y (2010) Telehealth in palliative care in the UK: a review of the evidence. J Telemed Telecare 16:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pronovost A, Peng P, Kern R (2009) Telemedicine in the management of chronic pain: a cost analysis study. Can J Anesth 56:590–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of members of the Virtual Clinic Pilot Project Team, drawn from Alberta Health Services Cancer Care (Cross Cancer Institute and Community Oncology), Seniors Health (North Zone), and Telehealth. This study was funded by Alberta Health and Wellness.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors have full control of all primary data which may be reviewed by the journal if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alysa Fairchild.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, S.M., Fairchild, A., Pituskin, E. et al. Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project. Support Care Cancer 21, 1201–1207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1649-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1649-7

Keywords

Navigation