Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is a change in patient-reported dysphagia after induction chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer a predictive factor for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, only those responding to the treatment ultimately benefit from preoperative chemoradiation. We investigated whether changes in subjective dysphagia or eating restrictions after two cycles of induction chemotherapy can predict histopathological tumor response observed after chemoradiation. In addition, we examined general long-term quality of life (QoL) and, in particular, eating restrictions after esophagectomy.

Materials and methods

Patients with resectable, locally advanced squamous cell- or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery. They were asked to complete the EORTC oesophageal-specific QoL module (EORTC QLQ-OES24), and linear analogue self-assessment QoL indicators, before and during neoadjuvant therapy and quarterly until 1 year postoperatively. A median change of at least eight points was considered as clinically meaningful.

Main results

Clinically meaningful improvements in the median scores for dysphagia and eating restrictions were found during induction chemotherapy. These improvements were not associated with a histopathological response observed after chemoradiation, but enhanced treatment compliance. Postoperatively, dysphagia scores remained low at 1 year, while eating restrictions persisted more frequently in patients with extended transthoracic resection compared to those with limited transhiatal resection.

Conclusions

The improvement of dysphagia and eating restrictions after induction chemotherapy did not predict tumor response observed after chemoradiation. One year after esophagectomy, dysphagia was a minor problem, and global QoL was rather good. Eating restrictions persisted depending on the surgical technique used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Barham CP et al (2007) Quality of life during potentially curative treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 94(11):1369–1376 doi:10.1002/bjs.5888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernhard J, Hürny C, Coates AS et al (1997) Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 8(9):825–835 doi:10.1023/A:1008269715091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhard J, Lowy A, Mathys N et al (2004) Health related quality of life: a changing construct? Qual Life Res 13(7):1187–1197 doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000037485.59681.7d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhard J, Maibach R, Thurlimann B et al (2002) Patients’ estimation of overall treatment burden: why not ask the obvious? J Clin Oncol 20(1):65–72 doi:10.1200/JCO.20.1.65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernhard J, Sullivan M, Hurny C et al (2001) Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 84(9):1156–1165 doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.1785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beseth BD, Bedford R, Isacoff WH et al (2000) Endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately assess pathologic stage of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Am Surg 66(9):827–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Farndon JR (2000) Quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 155:193–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Winstone K et al (1996) Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Eur J Cancer 32A(11):1912–1917 doi:10.1016/0959-8049(96)00199-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E et al (2003) Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 39(10):1384–1394 doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00270-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blazeby JM, Kavadas V, Vickery CW et al (2005) A prospective comparison of quality of life measures for patients with esophageal cancer. Qual Life Res 14(2):387–393 doi:10.1007/s11136-004-0622-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blazeby JM, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J et al (2005) Association between quality of life scores and short-term outcome after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. Br J Surg 92(12):1502–1507 doi:10.1002/bjs.5175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blazeby JM, Sanford E, Falk SJ et al (2005) Health-related quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for localized esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 103(9):1791–1799 doi:10.1002/cncr.20980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP et al (1997) Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 337(3):161–167 doi:10.1056/NEJM199707173370304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brucher BL, Becker K, Lordick F et al (2006) The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer 106(10):2119–2127 doi:10.1002/cncr.21850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V et al (2005) Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6(9):659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, van Sandick JW et al (2004) Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 22(20):4202–4208 doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.11.102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM et al (2007) Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8(3):226–234 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham AJ, Shrive FM, Ghali WA et al (2007) Defining the optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 83(4):1257–1264 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagergren P, Avery KN, Hughes R et al (2007) Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer 110(3):686–693 doi:10.1002/cncr.22833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Le Prise E, Etienne PL, Meunier B et al (1994) A randomized study of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery versus surgery for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer 73(7):1779–1784 doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940401)73:7<1779::AID-CNCR2820730702>3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73(11):2680–2686 doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2680::AID-CNCR2820731105>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ott K, Weber WA, Lordick F et al (2006) Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 24(29):4692–4698 doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reynolds JV, McLaughlin R, Moore J et al (2006) Prospective evaluation of quality of life in patients with localized oesophageal cancer treated by multimodality therapy or surgery alone. Br J Surg 93(9):1084–1090 doi:10.1002/bjs.5373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruhstaller T, Widmer L, Balmer Majno S et al (2007) Preoperative induction chemotherapy with docetaxel-cisplatin followed by concurrent docetaxel–cisplatin and radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a prospective, multicenter phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. J Clin Oncol 25:4562 (Meeting Abstracts)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sloan JA (2005) Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions. COPD 2(1):57–62 doi:10.1081/COPD-200053374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE (1999) Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48:1507–1515 doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N et al (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317 doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Swisher SG, Maish M, Erasmus JJ et al (2004) Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 78(4):1152–1160 discussion 1152-60 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D et al (2008) Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol 26(7):1086–1092 doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A et al (2001) Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19(2):305–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. van Meerten E, van der Gaast A, Looman CW et al (2008) Quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment and after surgery for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(1):160–166 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D et al (1996) A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 335(7):462–467 doi:10.1056/NEJM199608153350702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Watt E, Whyte F (2003) The experience of dysphagia and its effect on the quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 12(2):183–193 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00376.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber WA, Ott K, Becker K et al (2001) Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol 19(12):3058–3065

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Sandra Thierstein, trial coordinator of the SAKK Berne, for her tremendous administrative support for this trial, Pierluigi Ballabeni and Christian von Briel for assistance in designing this trial, Yvonne Wechsler for the development of the QoL substudy, and Jürg Bernhard and Daniela Gerber of the SAKK and Beat Thürlimann, St. Gallen, Switzerland, for editing the manuscript.

The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) was the sponsor of the trial, and it was financially supported by the State Secretariat for Education and Research (SER) of Switzerland and Sanofi-Aventis Switzerland.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has to declare any potential conflicts of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Ribi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribi, K., Koeberle, D., Schuller, J.C. et al. Is a change in patient-reported dysphagia after induction chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer a predictive factor for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation?. Support Care Cancer 17, 1109–1116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0570-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0570-6

Keywords

Navigation