Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 1-2/2017

01.01.2017 | original article

Vaccine hesitancy in Austria

A cross-sectional survey

verfasst von: Michael J. Sandhofer, MD, Oliver Robak, Herbert Frank, Johannes Kulnig

Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 1-2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon particularly in industrialized nations. It has led to repeated epidemic outbreaks of otherwise vaccine-preventable, infectious diseases. Compared to other countries very low rates of influenza and measles vaccination rates have been reported in Austria.

Methods

We performed a single-center cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. A total of 350 adult patients attending our emergency room participated in this survey. We assessed knowledge and attitudes towards vaccination and the associated infectious diseases.

Results

Out of 350 participants 40 (11.4 %) declared that they deliberately refused vaccinations. Most common reasons for non-vaccination were fear of adverse effects (35.9 %), doubt of effectiveness of vaccines (35.9 %) and distrust towards the pharmaceutical industry (23.1 %). Of all 350 participants only 148 (42.3 %) thought themselves to be sufficiently informed about national vaccination recommendations as stated in the Austrian National Vaccination Program (ANVP). General practitioners (GP) were the primary source of healthcare-related information for 256 (73.1 %) participants. Furthermore, GPs as well as hospital-based physicians achieved the highest level of trust in this study population.

Conclusions

The results of our study underline the necessity of comprehensive informational campaigns on the merits of vaccination. A lack of knowledge about the benefits of vaccination, uncertainty and unfounded fears seem to prevent the achievement of recommended vaccination rates. Family GPs enjoyed the highest levels of trust in our study population. We believe that additional information communicated by GPs could help boost the low vaccination rates. This study underlines the important role of primary care practitioners in informing patients about vaccines and healthcare topics.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunze U, Böhm G, Groman E. Influenza vaccination in Austria from 1982 to 2011: a country resistant to influenza prevention and control. Vaccine. 2013;31:5099–103.CrossRefPubMed Kunze U, Böhm G, Groman E. Influenza vaccination in Austria from 1982 to 2011: a country resistant to influenza prevention and control. Vaccine. 2013;31:5099–103.CrossRefPubMed
6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Redlberger-Fritz M, Kundi M, Popow-Kraupp T. Detailed report on 2014/15 influenza virus characteristics, and estimates on influenza virus vaccine effectiveness from austria’s sentinel physician surveillance network. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Redlberger-Fritz M, Kundi M, Popow-Kraupp T. Detailed report on 2014/15 influenza virus characteristics, and estimates on influenza virus vaccine effectiveness from austria’s sentinel physician surveillance network. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieu TA, Ray GT, Klein NP, Chung C, Kulldorff M. Geographic clusters in underimmunization and vaccine refusal. Pediatrics. 2015;135:280–9.CrossRefPubMed Lieu TA, Ray GT, Klein NP, Chung C, Kulldorff M. Geographic clusters in underimmunization and vaccine refusal. Pediatrics. 2015;135:280–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, Halsey N. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable. Diseases. 2009;360(19):1981–8. doi:10.1056/nejmsa0806477. Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, Halsey N. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable. Diseases. 2009;360(19):1981–8. doi:10.​1056/​nejmsa0806477.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroneman M, Van Essen GA, Paget WJ. Influenza vaccination coverage and reasons to refrain among high-risk persons in four European countries. Vaccine. 2006;24:622–8.CrossRefPubMed Kroneman M, Van Essen GA, Paget WJ. Influenza vaccination coverage and reasons to refrain among high-risk persons in four European countries. Vaccine. 2006;24:622–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz JB, Bell RA. Understanding vaccination resistance: vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information. Vaccine. 2014;32:5776–80.CrossRefPubMed Ruiz JB, Bell RA. Understanding vaccination resistance: vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information. Vaccine. 2014;32:5776–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Austrian Ministry of Health. Austrian National Vaccination Policy. 2014, in German. Austrian Ministry of Health. Austrian National Vaccination Policy. 2014, in German.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Colzani E, et al. Impact of measles national vaccination coverage on burden of measles across 29 member states of the European Union and European Economic Area, 2006–2011. Vaccine. 2014;32:1814–9.CrossRefPubMed Colzani E, et al. Impact of measles national vaccination coverage on burden of measles across 29 member states of the European Union and European Economic Area, 2006–2011. Vaccine. 2014;32:1814–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Salmon DA, Dudley MZ, Glanz JM, Omer SB. Vaccine hesitancy: causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine. 2015;33:D66–D71.CrossRefPubMed Salmon DA, Dudley MZ, Glanz JM, Omer SB. Vaccine hesitancy: causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine. 2015;33:D66–D71.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunze U, Kunze M. The austrian vaccination paradox: tick-borne encephalitis vaccination versus influenza vaccination. Cent Eur J Public Heal. 2015;23:223–6.CrossRef Kunze U, Kunze M. The austrian vaccination paradox: tick-borne encephalitis vaccination versus influenza vaccination. Cent Eur J Public Heal. 2015;23:223–6.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Vaccine hesitancy in Austria
A cross-sectional survey
verfasst von
Michael J. Sandhofer, MD
Oliver Robak
Herbert Frank
Johannes Kulnig
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2017
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 1-2/2017
Print ISSN: 0043-5325
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1062-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2017

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 1-2/2017 Zur Ausgabe