Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

Is it superior to open surgery?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopically assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Methods

The records of 21 patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LG) for preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal gastric carcinoma between January 1996 and August 1998 were reviewed and compared with those of 31 open distal gastrectomy patients during the same period.

Results

Age, gender, and size and histologic differentiation of the lesions were matched. Those located at the body of the stomach (p=0.011) and those macroscopically depressed (p=0.049) were subjected more frequently to open surgery. Laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy required significantly longer operative time (p<0.001) with less extensive lymph node dissection (p<0.001). However, time to start of walking (p=0.032), time to flatus (p=0.002), duration of postoperative fever (p=0.027), and postoperative hospital stay (p=0.001) were significantly shorter in the LG group, and this group had a lower white blood cell count on the first postoperative day (p=0.010). Blood loss and time to oral intake were comparable between the groups. Complications included one conversion to open surgery, one leakage, and one stenosis in the LG group, and two leakages and an atelectasis in the OG group.

Conclusions

Although LG requires longer surgical time, this retrospective study suggests that it is superior to open surgery in terms of faster postoperative recoveries, shorter hospital stays, and cosmetic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akahoshi K, Chijiiwa Y, Sasaki I, Hamada S, Iwakiri Y, Nawata H, Kabemura T (1997) Preoperative TN staging of gastric cancer using a 15-MHz ultrasound miniprobe. Br J Radiol 70: 703–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anvari M, Park A (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted vagotomy and distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 1312–1315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm B, Milsom JW, Fazio VW (1995) Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg 130: 415–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JTM, van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Taat CW, van Lanschot J, Meyer S, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H, van de Velde CJH (1995) Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 345: 745–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211: 60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler DL, White SA (1996) Laparoscopic gastrectomy: five cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6: 98–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW (1991) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg 213: 651–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman RL, Hiatt JR, Korman JL, Facklis K, Cymerman J, Phillips EH (1997) Laparoscopic or open splenectomy for hematologic disease: which approach is superior? J Am Coll Surg 1985: 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. Furutomi H, Sakita T (1984) Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 14: 169–179

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glasgow RE, Yee LF, Mulvihill SJ (1997) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the emerging standard. Surg Endosc 11: 108–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goh P, Tekant Y, Isaac J, Kum CK, Ngoi SS (1992) The technique of laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 258–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasson HM (1978) Open laparoscopy vs closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates. Adv Planned Parenthood 13: 41–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hotokezaka M, Combs MJ, Schirmer BD (1996) Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs. Dig Dis Sci 41: 705–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iriyama K, Asakawa T, Koike H, Nishiwaki H, Suzuki H (1989) Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessary for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach? Arch Surg 124: 309–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1981) The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg 11: 127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitano S, Yasunori I, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscope-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 146–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitaoka H, Yoshikawa K, Hirota T, Itabashi M (1984) Surgical treatment of early gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 14: 283–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Korenaga D, Haraguchi M, Tsujitani S, Okamura T, Tamada R, Sugimachi K (1986) Clinicopathological features of mucosal carcinoma of the stomach with lymph node metastasis in eleven patients. Br J Surg 73: 431–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McIntyre RC, Zoeter MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM (1992) A comparison of outcome and cost of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagai Y, Tanimura H, Takifuji K, Kashiwagi H, Yamoto H, Nakatani Y (1995) Laparoscope-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 281–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohashi S (1995) Laparoscopic intraluminal (intragastric) surgery for early gastric cancer: a new concept in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 169–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohgami M, Kumai K, Otani Y, Wakabayashi G, Kubota T, Kitajima M (1994) Laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach for early gastric cancer using a lesion-lifting method. Dig Surg 11: 64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schippers E, Öttinger AP, Anurov M, Polivoda M, Schumpelick V (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a minor abdominal trauma? World J Surg 17: 539–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP (1993) Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 59: 549–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takekoshi T, Baba Y, Ota H, Kato Y, Yanagisawa A, Takagi K, Noguchi Y (1994) Endoscopic resection of early gastric carcinoma: results of a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. Endoscopy 26: 352–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yanai H, Matsumoto Y, Harada T, Nishiaki M, Tokiyama H, Shigemitsu T, Tada M, Okita K (1997) Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy for staging depth of invasion in early gastric cancer: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 46: 212–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimizu, S., Uchiyama, A., Mizumoto, K. et al. Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 14, 27–31 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900005

Key words

Navigation