Abstract
Background
Despite the rapid spread of laparoscopic gastric surgery in Japan, no one has yet evaluated the costs for this new technique. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the hospital charges for laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy with those for conventional open gastrectomy.
Methods
The study included 48 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy and 43 who had a conventional open Billroth I gastrectomy for cure of early gastric cancer between May 1994 and April 2000. Hospital charges covered all costs incurred during the hospital stay; they were divided into charges for consultation, prescription, injection, nursing care, operating theater, laboratory, radiology, ward and meal, and others.
Results
The patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy were similar to those who had open gastrectomy in proximal resection margin, number of harvested lymph nodes, and stage of the disease. Hospital stay after laparoscopic gastrectomy was shorter than that after open gastrectomy (16.1 vs 20.5 days, p<0.01). Charges for nursing care, charges for ward and meal, and total hospital charges were less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (¥5800 vs ¥8010, p<0.01; ¥461×103 vs ¥512×103, p<0.05; ¥1336×103 vs ¥1411×103, p=0.072). When we compared laparoscopic gastrectomies performed during 1994–96 with those done during 1997–2000, we found a decrease in charges for ward and meal and total hospital charges (¥498×103 vs ¥421×103, p<0.01; ¥1390×103 vs ¥1277×103, p<0.01).
Conclusion
Laparoscopic-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy is less expensive then conventional open Billorth I gastrectomy because both the postoperative recovery period and the hospital stay are shorter. In patients who undergo gastrectomy, the additional costs of the disposable instruments can be fully offset by the lower charges for ward and meal and nursing care associated with laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy Arch Surg 135: 806–810
Adachi Y, Suematsu T, Shiraishi N, Katsuta T, Morimoto A, Kitano S, Akazawa K (1999) Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Ann Surg 229: 49–54
Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjis NS (1994) Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 32–34
Barber JA, Thompson SG (1998) Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies. Br Med J 317: 1195–1200
Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira R, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–44
Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing twostage vs single stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13: 952–957
Fullarton GM, Darling K, Williams J, MacMillan R, Bell G (1994) Evaluation of the cost of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 81: 124–126
Greenwald JA, McMullen HF, Coppa GF, Newman RM (2000) Standardization of surgeon-controlled variables: impact on outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 3: 339–344
Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Sorasto A, Autio R, Södervik H, Mäkelä H, Hulkko A (1999) Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup. J Am Coll Surg 188: 368–376
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyö G, Graffner H, Heilerbäck B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sörensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53
Jordan AM (1991) Hospital charges for laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy [Letter]. JAMA 266: 3425
Kakisako K, Sato K, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Miyahara M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopic colectomy for Dukes A colon cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 10: 66–70
Kitano S, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Seumatsu T, Bando T (1999) Laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinomas. Jpn J Surg 29: 389–391
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 146–148
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1992) A newly designed single dissector useful for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 6: 144–146
Kitano S, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1992) Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal surgery for common bile duct stones [Letter]. Endoscopy 24: 804
Kitano S, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1992) A simple and rapid technique for suture ligation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2: 321–322
Kitano S, Shimoda K, Miyahara M, Shiraishi N, Bandoh T, Yoshida T, Shuto K, Kobayashi M (1995) Laparoscopic approaches in the management of patients with early gastric carcinomas. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 359–362
Krämling HJ, Hüttl TP, Heberer G (1999) Development of gallstone surgery in Germany. Surg Endosc 13: 909–913
McKellar DP, Johnson RM, Dutro JA, Mellinger J, Bernie WA, Peoples JB (1995) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 158–163
Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12
Pfeifer J, Wexner SD, Reissman P, Bernstein M, Nogueras JJ Singh S, Weiss E (1995) Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery: costs and outcome. Surg Endosc 9: 1322–1326
Shimizu S, Uchiyama A, Mizumoto K, Morisaki T, Nakamura K, Shimura H, Tanaka M (2000) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it superior to open surgery? Surg Endosc 14: 27–31
Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S, Bandoh T, Katsuta T, Morimoto A (1999) Indication for and outcome of laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Br J Surg 86: 541–544
Suzuki M, Akaishi S, Rikiyama T, Naitoh T, Rahman MM, Matsuno S (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Calot’s triangle, and variations in cystic arterial supply. Surg Endosc 14: 141–144
Tanoue K, Hashizume M, Morita M, Migoh S, Tsugawa K, Yagi S, Ohta M, Sugimachi K (1999) Results of laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Surg 177: 222–226
Thompson SG, Barber JA (2000) How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? Br Med J 320: 1197–1200
Ure BM, Lefering R, Troidl H (1995) Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc 9: 401–406
Vanek VW, Bourguet CC (1995) The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. Surg Endosc 9: 314–323
Wenner J, Graffner H, Lindell G (1995) A financial analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 702–705
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 12 June 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adachi, Y., Shiraishi, N., Ikebe, K. et al. Evaluation of the cost for laparoscopic-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 932–936 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090089
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090089