Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The implementation of the laparoscopic and robotic approaches for major hepatectomy (LMH and RMH) was slower than that for minor hepatectomy, but has significantly increased over the past years. The role or advantages of RMH remains controversial, and we aimed to compare the peri-/postoperative outcomes of LMH versus RMH.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA guidelines (end-of-search date: March 16th, 2020). Only comparative studies (LMH vs. RMH) reporting on outcomes of interest were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity was encountered; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was implemented. Quality of evidence assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results

Seven retrospective cohort studies comparing LMH (n = 300) versus RMH (n = 225) were identified. No significant difference was observed between LMH and RMH regarding overall complications [odds ratio (OR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–2.23; p = 0.13], severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) [risk difference (RD) 0.01, 95% CI − 0.03 to 0.05; p = 0.72], and overall mortality (RD 0.00, 95% CI − 0.02 to 0.03; p = 0.73). The two approaches were also equivalent regarding conversion to open hepatectomy (RD 0.03, 95% CI − 0.01 to 0.08; p = 0.15), margin-positive resection (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.51–3.52; p = 0.55), and transfusion rate (RD − 0.03, 95% CI − 0.16 to 0.11; p = 0.67). No significant difference was observed for LMH versus RMH regarding blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.27, 95% CI − 0.24 to 0.77; p = 0.30), operative time (SMD − 0.08, 95% CI − 0.51 to 0.34; p = 0.70), and length of stay (SMD 0.13, 95% CI − 0.58 to 0.84; p = 0.72).

Conclusion

LMH and RMH have equivalent peri-/postoperative outcomes when performed in select patients and high-volume centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziogas IA, Tsoulfas G (2017) Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 9(12):233–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaneko H, Takagi S, Shiba T (1996) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy: technique and results of a clinical series. Surgery 120(3):468–475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Hamy A et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 17(1):23–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246(3):385–392

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Troisi R, Montalti R, Smeets P, Van Huysse J, Van Vlierberghe H, Colle I et al (2008) The value of laparoscopic liver surgery for solid benign hepatic tumors. Surg Endosc 22(1):38–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stephan F, Bensaid S et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232(6):753–762

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Soubrane O, Cherqui D, Scatton O, Stenard F, Bernard D, Branchereau S et al (2006) Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in living donors: safety and reproducibility of the technique in a single center. Ann Surg 244(5):815–820

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mala T, Edwin B, Rosseland AR, Gladhaug I, Fosse E, Mathisen O (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection: experience of 53 procedures at a single center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12(4):298–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg 25(4):305–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJW, Zeidan B, Zeidan S, Hallam MJ, Armstrong T et al (2008) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34(12):1285–1288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aldrighetti L, Pulitano C, Catena M, Arru M, Guzzetti E, Casati M et al (2008) A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(3):457–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV et al (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248(3):475–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien P-A, Gadzijev E, Garden JO, Lau W-Y et al (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2(3):333–339

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, Tranchart H, Fuks D, Soubrane O et al (2014) International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):732–736

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huscher CG, Lirici MM, Chiodini S, Recher A (1997) Current position of advanced laparoscopic surgery of the liver. J R Coll Surg Edinb 42(4):219–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Rourke N, Fielding G (2004) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg 8(2):213–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC et al (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250(5):856–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen KT, Geller DA (2010) Laparoscopic liver resection-current update. Surg Clin N Am 90(4):749–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanna T, Imber C (2018) Robotics in HPB surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100(6_sup):31–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Fong Y, Hagendoorn J (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 18(2):113–120

    Google Scholar 

  26. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586

    Google Scholar 

  28. Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai ECH, Tang CN (2016) Long-term survival analysis of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 26(2):162–166

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kingham TP, Leung U, Kuk D, Gönen M, D’Angelica MI, Allen PJ et al (2016) Robotic liver resection: a case-matched comparison. World J Surg 40(6):1422–1428

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Khan S, Beard RE, Kingham PT, Fong Y, Boerner T, Martinie JB et al (2018) Long-term oncologic outcomes following robotic liver resections for primary hepatobiliary malignancies: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 25(9):2652–2660

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin N-C, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2013) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Surg 257(2):205–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Z-Y, Chen Q-L, Sun L-L, He S-P, Luo X-F, Huang L-S et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies. BMC Cancer 19(1):1047

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Vagios S, Merath K, Pawlik TM (2018) Safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic liver resections: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 117(7):1517–1530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Machairas N, Papaconstantinou D, Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Prodromidou A, Paspala A et al (2019) Comparison between robotic and open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Updates Surg 71(1):39–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Montalti R, Berardi G, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2015) Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21(27):8441–8451

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Guan R, Chen Y, Yang K, Ma D, Gong X, Shen B et al (2019) Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis. Asian J Surg 42(1):19–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: ACM, p 38:1-38:10. (EASE ’14). http://doi.acm.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268

  41. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14(1):135

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Higgins J, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. www.handbook.cochrane.org

  45. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mejia A, Cheng SS, Vivian E, Shah J, Oduor H, Archarya P (2020) Minimally invasive liver resection in the era of robotics: analysis of 214 cases. Surg Endosc 34(1):339–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Marino MV, Shabat G, Guarrasi D, Gulotta G, Komorowski AL (2019) Comparative study of the initial experience in performing robotic and laparoscopic right hepatectomy with technical description of the robotic technique. Dig Surg 36(3):241–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH, Cochran A, Khan A, Ocuin L et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB 21(7):906–911

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee SJ, Lee JH, Lee Y-J, Kim SC, Hwang DW, Song KB et al (2019) The feasibility of robotic left-side hepatectomy with comparison of laparoscopic and open approach: consecutive series of single surgeon. Int J Med Robot 15(2):e1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang Z-Z, Tang W-B, Hu M-G, Zhao Z-M, Zhao G-D, Li C-G et al (2019) Robotic vs laparoscopic hemihepatectomy: a comparative study from a single center. J Surg Oncol 120(4):646–653

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Magistri P, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Assirati G, Tarantino G, Di Benedetto F (2019) Improving outcomes defending patient safety: the learning journey in Robotic Liver Resections. Serra R, editor. Biomed Res Int 2019:1835085

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Nota CL, Borel Rinkes IH, Hagendoorn J (2017) Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6(4):239–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sugiyama Y, Ishizaki Y, Imamura H, Sugo H, Yoshimoto J, Kawasaki S (2010) Effects of intermittent Pringle’s manoeuvre on cirrhotic compared with normal liver. Br J Surg 97(7):1062–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102(7):796–804

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, Armstrong T, Takhar AS, van Dieren S et al (2016) Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg 151(10):923–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cheek SM, Geller DA (2016) The learning curve in laparoscopic major hepatectomy: what is the magic number? JAMA Surg 151(10):929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Brown KM, Geller DA (2016) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):1065–1071

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Chen C-N, Yuan R-H, Liang J-T et al (2017) Robotic major hepatectomy: is there a learning curve? Surgery 161(3):642–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S, Reddy S, Marsh JW, Geller DA et al (2012) Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(12):2233–2238

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim JK, Park JS, Han DH, Choi GH, Kim KS, Choi JS et al (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of liver. Surg Endosc 30(11):4756–4764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yu Y-D, Kim K-H, Jung D-H, Namkoong J-M, Yoon S-Y, Jung S-W et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045

    Google Scholar 

  64. Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP et al (2006) Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 20(1):119–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs–the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363(8):701–704

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Mierzwinski-Urban M, et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. (CADTH Technology Report, No. 137.) 5, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

  67. D’Annibale A, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Pozzobon M, Gianfreda V, Sovernigo G et al (2004) The da Vinci robot in right adrenalectomy: considerations on technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 14(1):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  68. Betcher RE, Chaney JP, Lacy PR, Otey SK, Wood DJ (2014) Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Robot Surg 8(1):35–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, Sun V, Lee B, Singh G et al (2018) Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7(2):77–84

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kose E, Kahramangil B, Aydin H, Donmez M, Aucejo F, Quintini C et al (2020) Minimally invasive resection of posterosuperior liver tumors in the supine position using intra-abdominal trocars. Surg Endosc 34(2):536–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nota CLMA, Molenaar IQ, van Hillegersberg R, Borel Rinkes IHM, Hagendoorn J (2016) Robotic liver resection including the posterosuperior segments: initial experience. J Surg Res 206(1):133–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30(3):1004–1013

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wabitsch S, Schöning W, Kästner A, Haber PK, Benzing C, Krenzien F et al (2020) A propensity-matched study of full laparoscopic versus hand-assisted minimal-invasive liver surgery. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07597-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fiorentini G, Swaid F, Cipriani F, Ratti F, Heres C, Tsung A, Aldrighetti L, Geller DA (2019) Propensity score matched analysis of pure laparoscopic versus hand-assisted/hybrid major hepatectomy at two western centers. World J Surg 43:2025–2037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gumbs AA, Croner R, Rodriguez A, Zuker N, Perrakis A, Gayet B (2013) 200 Consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder. Surg Endosc 27(10):3781–3791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2013) Adopting Gayet’s techniques of totally laparoscopic liver surgery in the United States. Liver Cancer 2(1):5–15

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding or type of assistance was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Geller.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Ioannis A. Ziogas, Dimitrios Giannis, Stepan M. Esagian, Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, Samer Tohme, and David A. Geller have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziogas, I.A., Giannis, D., Esagian, S.M. et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35, 524–535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08008-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08008-2

Keywords

Navigation