Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy, specifically the bridged mesh technique, is a popular means used for ventral hernia repair. While laparoscopy has decreased the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), hernia recurrence rates remain unchanged. Some surgeons advocate laparoscopic primary fascial closure (PFC) with placement of intraperitoneal mesh to decrease recurrence rates. We hypothesize that in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), PFC compared to a bridged mesh repair decreases hernia recurrence rates.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective database of all ventral hernia repairs performed from 2010–2012 was accessed. Patients who underwent LVHR with mesh were reviewed. Patients who had PFC were compared to bridged repair. Primary outcome was hernia recurrence determined by clinical examination or CT scan. Secondary outcomes included SSI and seroma formation.

Results

A total of 1594 patients were identified. Following exclusion, a total of 196 patients were left who underwent LVHR with a mean follow-up period of 17.5 months. Ninety-seven patients underwent PFC, while 99 underwent bridged repairs. Initial comparisons between both groups was negative for any significant statistical difference in terms of recurrence, seroma formation, SSI, deep/organ space SSI, reoperation, and readmission. The same initial findings held true during subgroup analysis. Propensity score analysis was then performed for recurrence, seroma, and SSI controlling for age, gender, immune status, ASA class, BMI, smoking status, and acute repair. No statistically significant differences were identified in either group.

Conclusion

Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic hernia repairs did not result in reduced recurrence, seroma, and SSI as compared to bridge repairs in a retrospective, multi-institutional study. However, additional research is needed to further evaluate benefits to the patient in terms of pain, function, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction. Randomized, blinded, control trials should focus on these parameters in future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK, Linn J, Noria S, Zagol B, Mikami DJ (2012) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? Surg Endosc 26(5):1264–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Le Huu Nho R, Mege D, Ouaïssi M, Sielezneff I, Sastre B (2012) Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia. J Visc Surg 149(5):e3–e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72(1):70–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, Turnage RH (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24:95–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoppa RE (1989) The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg 13:545–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Temudom T, Siadai M, Sarr MG (1996) Repair of complex giant or recurrent ventral hernias by using tension-free intraparietal prosthetic mesh (Stoppa technique): lessons learned from our initial experience (fifty patients). Surgery 120:738–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heniford TB, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2000) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg 190:645–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heniford TB, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238(3):391

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin ME, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Balli JE, Gonzalez JJ (1998) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:294–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia 8:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD007781

  13. LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE, Rhynes VK (2003) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patients. Hernia 7:118–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demaria EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14:326–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lomanto D, Iyer SG, Shabbir A, Cheah WK (2006) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia mesh repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1030–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toy FK, Bailey RW, Carey S, Chappuis CW, Gagner M, Josephs LG, Mangiante EC, Park AE, Pomp A, Smoot RT Jr, Uddo JF Jr, Voeller GR (1998) Prospective, multicenter study of laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 12:955–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. GreviousMA Cohen M, Jean-Pierre F, Herrmann GE (2006) The use of prosthetics in abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 33:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. New Eng J Med 343:392–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palanivelu C, Jani KV, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Madhankumar MV, Malladi VK (2007) Laparoscopic sutured closure with mesh reinforcement of incisional hernias. Hernia 11:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshikawa K, Shimada M, Kurita N, Sato H, Iwata T, Higashijima J, Chikakiyo M, Nishi M, Kashihara H, Takasu C, Matsumoto N, Eto S (2014) Hybrid technique for laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repair combining laparoscopic primary closure and mesh repair. Asian J Endosc Surg 7:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2013) Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg 37:42–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang MK, Subramanian A, Awad SS (2012) Laparoscopic transcutaneous closure of central defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 22:e66–e70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeichen MS, Lujan HJ, Mata WN, Maciel VH, Lee D, Jorge I, Plasencia G, Gomez E, Hernandez AM (2013) Closure versus non-closure of hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh. Hernia 17:589–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38:3097–3104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Praveen Raj P, Ganesh MK, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Palanivelu C (2014) Concomitant laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with other clean contaminated procedures—study of feasibility and safety. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:33–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Christoffersen MW, Westen M, Assadzadeh S, Deigaard SL, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2014) The clinical effects of closure of the hernia gap after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Dan Med J 61:A4865

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shell DH 4th, de la Torre J, Andrades P, Vasconez LO (2008) Open repair of ventral incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 88:61–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonzalez AM, Romero RJ, Seetharamaiah R, Gallas M, Lamoureux J, Rabaza JR (2014) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1605

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, C-225 Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA

    John Emil Wennergren, Skylar Trott, Margaret Plymale & John Scott Roth

  2. Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Erik P. Askenasy

  3. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    Jacob A. Greenberg

  4. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Julie Holihan & Mike K. Liang

  5. Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Jerrod Keith

  6. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Science Center, Portland, OR, USA

    Robert G. Martindale

Authors
  1. John Emil Wennergren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erik P. Askenasy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacob A. Greenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie Holihan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jerrod Keith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mike K. Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert G. Martindale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Skylar Trott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Margaret Plymale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. John Scott Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Emil Wennergren.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. John Wennergren, Erik Askenasy, Jacob Greenberg, Julie Holihan, Jerrod Keith, Mike Liang, and Robert Martindale have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Skylar Trott and Margaret Plymale, MSN, RN, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. J. Scott Roth is a speaker for BARD. He has grants with Bard, Life Cell, and MTF. He is also a consultant for Life Cell and GORE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wennergren, J.E., Askenasy, E.P., Greenberg, J.A. et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study. Surg Endosc 30, 3231–3238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation